Stacey Abrams Nows Claims Race Plays Part As O'Rourke Gets More Airtime

I believe someone hit the switch and told the networks to start bringing Stacey Abrams on a lot more and have the public learn who she is.

Why would a losing candidate from Georgia begin to have so much advice for what's happening in the world? Abrams lost her 2018 fight for the Gubernatorial seat in Georgia, and she hasn't completely conceded the loss. A couple of weeks ago she claimed 2020 is still on the table for her if she planned on running for the White House.

I can't believe she's thinking about that but to each his own.

Recommended: Stacey Abrams Doesn’t Accept AG Barr’s Summation Of Mueller Investi...

MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell took on the profile of the network by using race warfare when speaking about the differences between Beto O'Rourke, Stacey Abrams and Andrew Gillum. If you have read my articles, you would know by now Democrats love creating history wherever they can. They have done it with John F. Kennedy (youngest elected president), Jimmy Carter (1st Southerner elected to White House since the Civil War), Bill Clinton and Al Gore (First presidential ticket where the youth was served and won) and then you had Barack Obama (first mixed-race president).

“Why Beto O’Rourke and not Andrew Gillum, and not Stacey Abrams, as the darling of the media?” Mitchell asked.

Abrams, instead of punting on the issue, took the bait and here is why her answer was idiotic. O'Rourke was running for Senate while Gillum and Abrams ran for Governor. A Senate race always gets national coverage over a state race; it's always been like that.

Let me also remind Abrams how she and Gillum held the national spotlight the last couple of weeks before and after the election as the first possible black Governors elected if they had won, and their fight to not concede after the election was over. For Abrams to claim there was racism is idiotic.

“I don’t think that success is zero sum, so I don’t want to disparage or take away from the reaction and the legitimate response people had to his campaign, but I do want to call the question. There is no difference — there is no distinction with a difference between what he accomplished and what Andrew and I accomplished.

I would challenge people to consider why we were not lifted up in the same way.”

“I think race plays a part. I think region plays a part. I also think phenotype plays a part. My responsibility is to investigate running for president because I want people to understand I may not look like the typical candidate, but that does not diminish my responsibility to run for the job. That would be true for Andrew if he was interested.”

Abrams didn't have to go there, but she did, and now she looks like a race-baiting candidate. Let me also add that O'Rourke has also jumped into the 2020 race for president. Why should anyone care what Abrams or Gillum has to say if they aren't jumping in also?

MSNBC played the race game and Abrams fell for it.

Original story appeared - https://www.waynedupree.com/abrams-says-orourke-gets-more-press-rac...

Views: 7

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Mrs.Tif Morgan on March 30, 2019 at 3:53am

 The media made it into a issue between people, they stack the deck, rig the minds of people for hate, to keep people from being friends.

 We do not the the bloody Government to get along and respect the life and rights of others. But when them rights infringe on others, that they create, for hate wars, then this happens: http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/mayoral-campaign-meeting-i...

 I have a video, hate between blacks and whites, I was so sad to see so many people hurt.

 They the media elite do their hate media very good.....

Comment by Bonnie Somer on March 28, 2019 at 5:11am

OK NOW I HAVE TO SAY IT

I AM SO DAMN F&&&&&& SICK AND TIRED OF BEING LECTURED B/C I AM WHITE AND HAVE PRIVILEGE I DO NOT KNOW I HAVE.    I WILL NO APOLOGIZE OR GIVE UP ANYTHING I AM NOT GOD I DID NOT CREATE MAN OR WOMAN OR ANYONE RACE .  OH AND BTW THERE ARE ONLY 2 GENDERS THANX.   THE DAY SOME MAN WOULD COME INTO THE LADIES ROOM  I WOULD KILL THAT PERSON.   MY GOD.   

THE LIB LEFT WINGNUTS HAVE GONE MAD AND THEY WANT US TO BE JUST AS UPSET AND ARE DETERMINED TO END THIS COUNTRY  I SAY NOT ON MY WATCH.

STOP LECTURING ME ON RACE AND GENDER SHUT UP ALREADY

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by Lisa BensonPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel

ALERT ALERT

CONFUSION:   Pelosi Says Constitution Spells Out ‘Two Co-Equal Branches’ Of Government

No Nancy. No.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi must be taking night classes at the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez School of Government.

Pelosi, the 79-year-old third-highest ranking official in the U.S. government, was speaking to the Center for American Progress today when she mistakenly said there are “two co-equal branches” of government, before correcting herself to say there are three.

Watch:

“First of all, let me just say, we take an oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” Pelosi said.

“Democrats take that oath seriously, and we are committed to honoring our oath of office. I’m not sure that our Republican colleagues share that commitment, and I’m not sure that the president of the United States does, too,” she claimed.

“So, in light of the fact that the beauty of the Constitution is a system of checks and balances— two co-equal branches— three co-equal branches of government,” she corrected with a laugh.

“A check and balance on each other,” she continued. “Con— Constitution spells out the pri— pa, uh, the duties of Congress and one of them is oversight of the president of the United States, another one of them is to impeach the president of the United States,” Pelosi said.

In November, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rallied supporters on Facebook to pitch in and help Democrats take back “all three chambers of Congress.”

“…the Progressive movement works and it wins in all districts…If we work our butts off to make sure that we take back all three chambers of Congress– three chambers of government…,” she said during the virtual appearance.

She clarified that she meant the “presidency, the Senate and the House.”

According to the Constitution, the three branches of government are the legislative, executive and judicial.

Below: Nancy Pelosi is continuing to promote the false narrative that President Trump is involved in a cover-up and therefore may be guilty of an impeachable offense. Millie Weaver joins Alex to break down the propaganda being used to overturn the democratic election of 2016 

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service