TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
It’s Time to Listen to Law Enforcement
 About the Border, Not Politicians
by John Dempsey  
.
DOD IG Reveals The Pentagon Let $27.7 Billion ‘Expire’ As
Trump Seeks $5.7 Billion In Border Wall Funding  
by Andrew Kerr
{dailycaller.com} ~ The Defense Department has relinquished over $27 billion to the U.S. Treasury since 2013 simply because it couldn’t spend the money quick enough... according to a DOD Inspector General report released Tuesday. The DOD was required to fork over the “expired funds” because the Pentagon failed to spend it “within the legal time frames,” according to the report. The revelation comes as President Donald Trump is considering  declaring a state of emergency that would allow him to bypass Congress and leverage unobligated military funds to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. The partial shutdown of the federal government entered its 19th day on Wednesday as Trump remains steadfast in his demand for $5.7 billion in border wall funding from Congress. Democrats, in turn, say they won’t negotiate with the president on the wall until the government reopens...
.
Frustration with the Fed Beckons Bipartisan Solution
by William Paul  
{freedomworks.org} ~ President Trump is upset with the…let’s call them, 'happenings' at the Fed. While his opinions on interest rates have changed over the past two years... his opinion of their infamous lack of oversight has remained constant since he endorsed the idea on his 2016 campaign. The Fed’s continued attempts to wrestle the market into the “perfect place” has caused the desire for accountability and transparency to reach an all-time high. Congress is now asking the right question: If this 'agency' is going to exist, should it be permitted to operate under such scarce oversight that they consider themselves an independent entity? Thankfully for President Trump, a growing bipartisan body of concerned Congress members led by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) have reintroduced a common-sense legislative solution to the Fed problem. The Federal Reserve Transparency Act, H.R. 24, would finally shine a light on the rogue agency. “We need to audit the Fed. It’s a creature of the swamp,” Rep. Massie said in an exclusive interview with Breitbart News. “It’s controlling the economy, and it’s still behind the veil, and people are demanding more transparency in their government in the Internet age—and we should know what our government is doing.”...
.
Why Wasn’t Fence Stipulated 
In Secure Fence Act Of 2006 Built?

by Jeff Dunetz
{lidblog.com} ~   Fence Act was introduced on Sept. 13, 2006, by Rep Peter King (R-NY) and passed Congress on a bi-partisan basis... In the House of Representatives, the Fence Act passed 283 -138 on September 14, 2006. On September 29, 2006, the Fence Act passed in the Senate 80 -19. Out of the eighty senators in total who voted in favor of the secure fence act, twenty-six out of the forty-four Democrats voted in favor of the bill one, Ted Kennedy did not vote. A dozen years later some of those Democratic Senators are still serving in the upper body Sherrod Brown was in the house, but is now in the Senate they include; Other notable Democrats who supported the bill in the Senate were Senator loose lips-Joe Biden, Senator scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton, Senator Harry dinky-Reid, and Senator Barack scumbag/liar-nObama. Of course, that was then, the Democratic Party strategy today is to oppose everything President Trump opposes.The fence should have built before Trump became President. But former Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison “opened the door” for Barack scumbag/liar-nObama to stop the fence from being built...  https://lidblog.com/secure-fence-act/ 
Former ICE Director WRECKS 
commie-Ocasio-Cortez And It’s AWEsome
by Tori McNabb
{redrightvideos.com} ~ Former ICE director Thomas Homan just gave socialist commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez a beautiful smackdown... Calling the 29-year-old an “embarrassment” and ripped her to shreds for saying ICE has committed human rights violations. “Every time she opens her mouth she’s wrong. Supposedly she went to college in Boston. She must be an embarrassment to that institution. She needs to do her homework. First of all, no child died in ICE custody. That was a different agency. That was the border patrol. They did everything they could do to save that child’s life. Alright? That child was in bad shape. You want to blame somebody for deaths in custody, then blame the Democrats who refused to close the loopholes that caused these families to come in the first place. When you talk about human rights violations does she realize ICE has arrested and removed hundreds of human rights violators in this country including Nazis and people that commit war crimes in part of Europe? We actually arrest a lot of human rights violators. And she ought to be saying thank you. She’s from New York. ICE agents have arrested and removed thousands of criminals from the streets of New York, that were released from sanctuary jails that she supports. So a thank you would be nice rather than misinformation that she always puts out.”...
Trump White House Preps Legal Justification
for Declaring National Emergency of Border Wall
by Jim E
{thepoliticalinsider.com} ~ The White House is reportedly seriously considering legal options and rationale should President Trump declare a national emergency to construct a border wall... Earlier today, President Trump told a scrum of reporters that he’s increasingly inclined to bypass Congress, including open-borders loving Democrats, and declare a national emergency to construct a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. “I’ll probably will do it, maybe definitely,” he informed the press, using three adverbs that, while partially jumbling the meaning, clearly show he’s more than likely to use the option should Democrats continue to oppose his plan.So far on Capitol Hill, Republicans have failed to negotiate with Democrats and work out a feasible deal the President would support. Trump isn’t just using bluster to goad Democrats to come to his side. The White House is, according to one CNN reporter, actually prepping a legal defense for Trump to declare a national emergency to build the wall. Jim Sciutto reports...
.
.
It’s Time to Listen to Law Enforcement
 About the Border, Not Politicians

by John Dempsey

{/townhall.com} ~ Political parties do not matter when it comes to the practicality and functionality of border walls. Democrats say that walls do not work and even some Republicans echo that sentiment. I do not care if a Republican - most likely like former Ohio Governor John Kasich – says that a physical barrier is not necessary. They are politicians worried about public opinion for the next election. Talk to a Border Patrol agent, sheriff deputy or police officer in a border county and you will get the truth about the need for a wall.

This week President Trump appeared with National Border Patrol Council President Brandon Judd at the White House press briefing room. Judd spoke about the effectiveness of a wall and the need for it and has experience on the border making him a valid voice of reason. Judd spoke with the men and women who patrol the southern border. He has been told how a wall would help prevent thousands of illegal crossings annually. Illegal aliens would not have free reign to cross as easily, preventing and deterring unlawful entry.

Leon Wilmont is sheriff in Yuma County, Arizona. He said that he cannot speak for others, but in his experience walls work in curbing illegal immigration. Wlimont said from 2005-2009 there was a 91percent drop in service calls and arrests related to illegals.

As recently as 2005, the Democratic Party was in favor of a border wall. Now, they have completely switched to an anti-wall stance. They have taken national security and safety and turned it into a political fight.

The government shutdown rests directly on the shoulders of House Speaker Nancy Pulosi (D-CA) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck scumbag/clown-Schumer (D-NY). The White House has sent invitations and offered a compromise but they refuse to make any concessions.

When dealing with the Left, one must understand their mentality. They are wanting to completely change the voting demographics of the United States. Their fight is not about compassion for others who come to America. If this was the case, they would be against illegal immigration and would not encourage amnesty. The Democratic Party is trying to get as many people who will vote for them as possible into the country and make them legal citizens.

As soon as Democrats make an issue political, be aware. The same thing applies to global warming or climate change or whatever they are calling environmental issues this week.

All that matters to Democrats is power and complete control. That is it. Nothing else. After the election of Trump, they see the Rust Belt disappearing. The black approval rate has been as high as 36 percent. They need new potential voters.

On the other hand, law enforcement and Border Patrol officials took an oath to uphold the laws of the country. They see firsthand what works and what does not. Seriously, how can Democrats claim to know about border security from Washington D.C in their buildings that have armed guards? Who takes them seriously on this topic? The left really does not know what they are talking about. Their fight is new voters, and that is why the wall is “immoral.”

If you want to know the truth, talk to a CBP agent. Forget what the “pundits” who are full of talking points and political motivation have to say on news networks. It should be a clue when certain news channels will not have anyone Border Patrol or border county officials on to speak. On the rare occasion that they do, the interviews are tense and short.

That is because the mainstream media has an agenda. Yes, Border Patrol has an agenda, a lawful one. They have sworn to uphold the laws of the country, not change them to advance their political desires.

Do not let politicians tell you what the southern border needs. Truly, unless they have spoken to the LEO’s on the border, they are clueless. If the politician agrees with Border Patrol, you can assume they are well-informed and educated on the subject. Otherwise, the squawking opposition is for political gain.

Views: 10

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Rudy Tirre on January 14, 2019 at 8:16am

Bonnie

Pretty much. But they also want power over others.

Comment by Bonnie Somer on January 14, 2019 at 5:00am

the dems do not want to listen

they do not care who dies how many Americans it is meaningless

to them

as for the money IT IS THERE IT IS 3 TENTHS OF 1 % OF THE BUDGET BUDGET IS 4 TRILLION YEP TRILLION IT IS A MEAGER AMT

WE KNOW IT IS ABT VOTES AND EVER HAVING A REPUBLICAN ELECTED FOR THE NEXT 100 YRS.

BRING IN VOTES THAT IS THE DEM PLAN EVEN THOUGH IT IS ILLEGAL AND THEY CANNOT VOTE.  LK AT CA AND NY AND IL.    ENOUGH ALREADY 

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by Lisa BensonPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel

ALERT ALERT

CONFUSION:   Pelosi Says Constitution Spells Out ‘Two Co-Equal Branches’ Of Government

No Nancy. No.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi must be taking night classes at the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez School of Government.

Pelosi, the 79-year-old third-highest ranking official in the U.S. government, was speaking to the Center for American Progress today when she mistakenly said there are “two co-equal branches” of government, before correcting herself to say there are three.

Watch:

“First of all, let me just say, we take an oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” Pelosi said.

“Democrats take that oath seriously, and we are committed to honoring our oath of office. I’m not sure that our Republican colleagues share that commitment, and I’m not sure that the president of the United States does, too,” she claimed.

“So, in light of the fact that the beauty of the Constitution is a system of checks and balances— two co-equal branches— three co-equal branches of government,” she corrected with a laugh.

“A check and balance on each other,” she continued. “Con— Constitution spells out the pri— pa, uh, the duties of Congress and one of them is oversight of the president of the United States, another one of them is to impeach the president of the United States,” Pelosi said.

In November, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rallied supporters on Facebook to pitch in and help Democrats take back “all three chambers of Congress.”

“…the Progressive movement works and it wins in all districts…If we work our butts off to make sure that we take back all three chambers of Congress– three chambers of government…,” she said during the virtual appearance.

She clarified that she meant the “presidency, the Senate and the House.”

According to the Constitution, the three branches of government are the legislative, executive and judicial.

Below: Nancy Pelosi is continuing to promote the false narrative that President Trump is involved in a cover-up and therefore may be guilty of an impeachable offense. Millie Weaver joins Alex to break down the propaganda being used to overturn the democratic election of 2016 

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service