william uthe
  • Male
  • Cohoes, NY
  • United States
Share on Facebook
Share

William uthe's Friends

  • Joseph Wonderless
  • Scott Brown
  • Lee Mulcahy
  • Rev. Paul P Waldmiller
  • Jody West
  • Forrest
  • Lisa Schultz
  • Molly Blank
  • Holly Den.
  • Robert Buckles
  • Maureen McNally
  • mitchell j rickey
  • Diane Jakopovic
  • James Harold Norton
  • Ralph Crossen

william uthe's Discussions

WILL CONGRESS BE ABLE TO RESTRUCTURE THE IRS TO A NON POLITICAL AGENCY ?

Started Aug 3, 2014 0 Replies

"The House Committee On Oversight and Reform Proposes Replacing IRS Commissioner with a Bi-Partisan Commission" according to a top contributor to linkedin discussion group TAX PROFFESSIONALS.The…Continue

Tags: obamacare, partisan, corruption, IRS

INCOME TAX REFUNDS WILL BE DELAYED

Started Oct 24, 2013 0 Replies

I R S Newswire IR-2013-82: 2014 dated Tues, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:28PM is a notification that the I R S has delayed the date that they will accept 2013 income tax filings to Feb. 4, 2013, The acceptance…Continue

WILL EXCERSISING OUR 5TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS WORK WITH THE IRS

Started May 23, 2013 0 Replies

If high ranking IRS officials can ue the 5th amendent to avoid answering questions posed by a congressional comitee, should we use take the 5th when that same official demands answers about our…Continue

FISCAL CLIFF SOLUTIONS

Started Nov 22, 2012 0 Replies

I have made the followng uggestions in letters to representatives Paul Tonko (D) and Chris Gibson(R) whom I hve had several dscussions with over the past 2 years.Both of these congressman have…Continue

Gifts Received (6)

Red Ribbon From 0zuy8a4dfxxpf Red Ribbon From ConservativeAmerican Red Ribbon From 27cf227cllxrd Red Ribbon From Tom McDermott
 

william uthe's Page

Profile Information

William uthe's Blog

PRESUMTIVE JUDGEMENT

Posted on August 16, 2017 at 7:58am 0 Comments

"JUDGE YE NOT LEST YE  BE JUDGED" THERE IS AN AWFUL LOT OF JUDGEMENTS BOUT CERTAIN PEOPLE, EITHOUT AN DOECUMENTION OR OTHER PROOF THAT THEY HAVE ANY BASIS.. SL

SOME PEOPLE LIKE TO MAKE JUDGERMENTS ABOUT SOMEONE ELLSE BASED ON THEIR OWN SPECULATION. SUCH  JUDMENTS CAN DAMAGE  SOMEONE ELSE WITHOUT ANY BASIS..

THE ALT LEFT SEEM TO BE EXPERTS WITH THIS AS THEY BLIEVE THEIR OWN SPECULATION JUSTIFIES THIS KIND OF CHARACTER ASSINATETION. PRES TRUMP AND MEMBERS OF HIS STAFF APEAR TO BE…

Continue

HATRED

Posted on August 15, 2017 at 8:29am 0 Comments

THERE APPEARS TO BE AN ABUNDANCE OF HATRED PERVADING OUR COUNTRY, THERE IS NO PLACE IN THE BILE WHER HATRED IS ENCOURAGED. YEARS AGO WHEN I RECONCILED WITH GOD, JESUS TAYGHT ME HOW TO REJECT HATRED.THE AMOUN OF AND VOLUME OF HATRED THAT PREVAILS AMONG THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY APPEARS TO BE ACCELARATING AT AN ALARMING RATE. THE LORDS PRAYER HAS RHIS PHRASE  " FORGIVE US OUR TREPASES AS WE FORGIVE THOSE WHO TRESPASS AGAINST US". MOST OF THE HATRED WEEMS TO BE CENTERED AND PRONMULGATED BY THE…

Continue

LAZY CONGRESS

Posted on August 12, 2017 at 10:02am 0 Comments

THE U.S.CONGRESS HAS DETERIATED INTO A GOVERNMENT PAID FOR SOCIAL CLUB FO ITS ELECTE4D MEMBERS.

THE ORIGINAL WORKED EVERY DAY THEY WERE IN SESSION.  

THE CURRENT CONGRESS WORKS PART TIME FOR A FULL DAYS PAY AND WHATEVER MONEY CAN GET FROM SUPORTERS, I

I CHECK C-SPAN EVERY DAY TO MONITOR THERE WORK, THE SENATE HAS AN E PTY CHAMBER EVERY DAY WTH NO SENATORS PRESENT, THEY COM AND GO AS THEY PLEASE OR WHEN THEY HAVE SOME POLITICAL RHETERIC TO SPOUT BUT VERY SELDOME TO…

Continue

obamacide

Posted on August 11, 2017 at 9:09am 0 Comments

I JUST READ AN ARTICL ON WHAT OBOMA DIE IN THE FINAL YEAR OF HI PRES. IT SEEMS HE HE ISSUED A PRES ORDER THAT WOULD MAKE SURE THAT ANYONE OVER 57 WOULD DIE EARLY BY REFUSING TO HAVE THEM UNINFORMED ABOUT CURES FOR VAEIOUS DISEASES WHIC COULOD EXTEND THIER LIF. PART OF THE DIE EARLY ASPECT OF OBOMACARE WHAT A GREAT PRES HE TURNED OUT TO BE

Comment Wall (14 comments)

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

At 8:21am on June 2, 2013, Karin Marie Fichtner said…

I am sorry it took me a year to answer this.  I don't actually log in too often, and I never imagined anyone would "friend" me in this group.  I hope the offer still stands. 

At 10:54am on January 1, 2012, Albert R Fromberger said…

Hello William,

Welcome to our group. Go to the Groups page. Not the listing by state. Fined

my group. Clack on to join. I will OK you as a member . Will talk to you more

after you are in . Thanks,

Al Fromberger

At 4:49pm on December 23, 2011, Roland C. Cartier Jr said…

  William Welcome to the fray of real patriots that care for our Nation as it is "One Nation Under God" We are the protectors that know our "oath" and we are the ones that can change the course that we are on for the good of all.

At 4:02pm on November 17, 2011, Molly Blank said…

Yes Bill that's what I was saying, I feel like Christians are losing their freedom of speech but every other religion is given more freedom of speech. I feel that should be one thing that needs to be brought up in some kind of form of a declaration of independence but i think we should give it a different name. That's what I wanted to say and that we just need to get back to the basics.

At 5:28pm on October 20, 2011, mitchell j rickey said…

I wrote this song for the Tea Party

 

"This is America" is an original song/video on You Tube.
Please click link to watch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejtBlD-QsoQ

At 2:58pm on September 13, 2011, Junior Sampson said…

Thanks William,

I do not get to post very often or even get on this page but I do believe in AMERICA and will state that till they put me under the ground. Have a great one friend and keep up the good fight....

 

At 3:21pm on September 11, 2011, James Harold Norton said…
Thanks william.  JHN
At 9:38pm on September 4, 2011, Zoraida Clark said…

Thank you William for adding me to your friends list.

 

Zoraida †

At 1:14pm on August 30, 2011, Tom McDermott gave william uthe a gift
At 5:20pm on August 26, 2011, Liberty Belle said…
Thank you William for the invite. I am looking forward to knowing you and sharing thoughts and ideas.
 
 
 

LIGHTER SIDE

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Lisa Benson

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

ALERT ALERT

FBI Text Should Alarm Every American

Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, the reported FBI lovebirds, are the poster children for the next “Don’t Text and Investigate” public service ads airing soon at an FBI office near you.

Their extraordinary texting affair on their government phones has given the FBI a black eye, laying bare a raw political bias brought into the workplace that agents are supposed to check at the door when they strap on their guns and badges.

It is no longer in dispute that they held animus for Donald Trump, who was a subject of their Russia probe, or that they openly discussed using the powers of their office to “stop” Trumpfrom becoming president. The only question is whether any official acts they took in the Russia collusion probe were driven by those sentiments.

The Justice Department’s inspector general is endeavoring to answer that question.

For any American who wants an answer sooner, there are just five words, among the thousands of suggestive texts Page and Strzok exchanged, that you should read.

That passage was transmitted on May 19, 2017. “There’s no big there there,” Strzok texted.

The date of the text long has intrigued investigators: It is two days after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein named special counsel Robert Mueller to oversee an investigation into alleged collusion between Trump and the Russia campaign.

Since the text was turned over to Congress, investigators wondered whether it referred to the evidence against the Trump campaign.

This month, they finally got the chance to ask. Strzok declined to say — but Page, during a closed-door interview with lawmakers, confirmed in the most pained and contorted way that the message in fact referred to the quality of the Russia case, according to multiple eyewitnesses.

The admission is deeply consequential. It means Rosenstein unleashed the most awesome powers of a special counsel to investigate an allegation that the key FBI officials, driving the investigation for 10 months beforehand, did not think was “there.”

By the time of the text and Mueller’s appointment, the FBI’s best counterintelligence agents had had plenty of time to dig. They knowingly used a dossier funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign — which contained uncorroborated allegations — to persuade the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court to issue a warrant to monitor Trump campaign adviser Carter Page (no relation to Lisa Page).

They sat on Carter Page’s phones and emails for nearly six months without getting evidence that would warrant prosecuting him. The evidence they had gathered was deemed so weak that their boss, then-FBI Director James Comey, was forced to admit to Congress after being fired by Trump that the core allegation remained substantially uncorroborated.

In other words, they had a big nothing burger. And, based on that empty-calorie dish, Rosenstein authorized the buffet menu of a special prosecutor that has cost America millions of dollars and months of political strife.

The work product Strzok created to justify the collusion probe now has been shown to be inferior: A Clinton-hired contractor produced multiple documents accusing Trump of wrongdoing during the election; each was routed to the FBI through a different source or was used to seed news articles with similar allegations that further built an uncorroborated public narrative of Trump-Russia collusion. Most troubling, the FBI relied on at least one of those news stories to justify the FISA warrant against Carter Page.

That sort of multifaceted allegation machine, which can be traced back to a single source, is known in spy craft as “circular intelligence reporting,” and it’s the sort of bad product that professional spooks are trained to spot and reject.

But Team Strzok kept pushing it through the system, causing a major escalation of a probe for which, by his own words, he knew had “no big there there.”

The answer as to why a pro such as Strzok would take such action has become clearer, at least to congressional investigators. That clarity comes from the context of the other emails and text messages that surrounded the May 19, 2017, declaration.

It turns out that what Strzok and Lisa Page were really doing that day was debating whether they should stay with the FBI and try to rise through the ranks to the level of an assistant director (AD) or join Mueller’s special counsel team.

“Who gives a f*ck, one more AD like [redacted] or whoever?” Strzok wrote, weighing the merits of promotion, before apparently suggesting what would be a more attractive role: “An investigation leading to impeachment?”

Lisa Page apparently realized the conversation had gone too far and tried to reel it in. “We should stop having this conversation here,” she texted back, adding later it was important to examine “the different realistic outcomes of this case.”

A few minutes later Strzok texted his own handicap of the Russia evidence: “You and I both know the odds are nothing. If I thought it was likely, I’d be there no question. I hesitate in part because of my gut sense and concern there’s no big there there.”

So the FBI agents who helped drive the Russia collusion narrative — as well as Rosenstein’s decision to appoint Mueller — apparently knew all along that the evidence was going to lead to “nothing” and, yet, they proceeded because they thought there was still a possibility of impeachment.

Impeachment is a political outcome. The only logical conclusion, then, that congressional investigators can make is that political bias led these agents to press an investigation forward to achieve the political outcome of impeachment, even though their professional training told them it had “no big there there.”

And that, by definition, is political bias in action.

How concerned you are by this conduct is almost certainly affected by your love or hatred for Trump. But put yourself for a second in the hot seat of an investigation by the same FBI cast of characters: You are under investigation for a crime the agents don’t think occurred, but the investigation still advances because the desired outcome is to get you fired from your job.

TEA PARTY TARGET

 Trump Poised To Take
 Control Of The Federal Reserve 

  • The Fed doesn’t stabilize markets and money — it does the opposite
  • President Trump sharply criticized the Federal Reserve this week, saying interest rate increases are hurting the economy.
  • Trump will have the opportunity to fashion the central bank in the image he would like as he has four vacancies to fill on the board of governors.
  • The result could be a more politicized Fed.

President Donald Trump has multiple reasons as to why he should take control of the Federal Reserve. He will do so both because he can and because his broader policies argue that he should do so. The president is anti-overregulating American industry. The Fed is a leader in pushing stringent regulation on the nation. By raising interest rates and stopping the growth in the money supply it stands in the way of further growth in the American economy.

First, He Can

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve is required to have seven members. It has three. Two of the current governors were put into their position by President Trump. Two more have been nominated by the president and are awaiting confirmation by the Senate. After these two are put on the Fed’s board, the president will then nominate two more to follow them. In essence, it is possible that six of the seven Board members will be put in place by Trump.

The Federal Open Market Committee has 12 members and sets the nation’s monetary policy. Seven of the 12 are the members of the Board of Governors. Five additional are Federal Reserve district bank presidents. Other than the head of the Fed bank in New York, who was nominated by the president, the other four can only take their positions as district bank presidents if the board in Washington agrees to their hiring. One of these, the Fed Bank president in Minneapolis, Neel Kashkari, is already arguing for no further rate increases.

Second, Regulation

Following the passage of the Dodd Frank Act in July 2010, the Fed was given enormous power to regulate the banking industry. It moved quickly to implement a number of new rules. The Fed set up a system that would penalize banks that failed to obey its new rules. These rules included setting limits as to how big an individual bank could be; how much money the banks had to invest in fed funds and Treasurys as a percent of their assets; which loans were desirable and which were not; where the banks had to obtain their funding and many, many, more up to and including how much a bank could pay its investors in dividends.

These rules have meaningfully slowed bank investments in the economy (the Volcker Rule) and they have had a crippling effect on bank lending in the housing markets (other agencies have had an impact here also).

Thus, of all of the government agencies the Fed has been possibly the most restrictive. The president has already moved to correct these excesses by putting in place a new Fed Governor (Randal Quarles) to regulate the banking industry.

Three, Killing Economic Growth

In the second quarter of 2018, the growth in non-seasonally adjusted money supply (M2) has been zero. That’s right, the money supply did not grow at all. This is because the Fed is shrinking its balance sheet ultimately by $50 billion per month. In addition, the Fed has raised interest rates seven times since Q4 2015. Supposedly there are five more rate increases coming.

This is the tightest monetary policy since Paul Volcker headed the institution in the mid-1980s. It will be recalled his policies led to back-to-back recessions. Current Fed monetary policy is directly in conflict with the president’s economic goals.

Moreover, the Treasury is estimating it will pay $415 billion in interest on the federal debt in this fiscal year. A better estimate might be $450 billion if rates keep going up. There are a lot of bridges and tunnels and jobs that could be created with this money.

Then there is inflation. It is likely to rise if the Fed eases its policies. If that happens paying down the federal debt becomes easier. On a less desirable note, higher interest rates lower real estate values. Lower rates that stimulate inflation increase real estate values.

Bottom Line

The president can and will take control of the Fed. It may be recalled when the law was written creating the Federal Reserve the secretary of the Treasury was designated as the head of the Federal Reserve. We are going to return to that era. Like it or not the Fed is about to be politicized.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service