I'm copying it as it was stated:(We document when we delete in case there is question)
White man has been overly generous to an unappreciative population of coloreds . Where would the progress of the world be if it it hadn't been for the white races leadership yet they they hate and envy the white man . Well all you others you're goingto get your wishes . White man is disappearing from the planet . He probably won't make it beyond a few more generations . It'll be VERY INTERESTING watching from the other side what you colored folks will turn the planet into without the white man to lead . Africa anyone ? How bout the Caribbean or SE Asia ? what will the new cultures be without white man ? Think about it ! Kinda Scary aint it ? Sharia Laws and muslim cultures . What happened to equal rights for women ? And that's just the beginning ! Whiteman is being WIMPIFIED so others can takeover . It's Gods WILL that whiteman will not survive the end times of the world . God is doing us a favor by preventing us from having to live through what's coming . Let the blacks and Asians have it and be thankful for God saving us from having to witness it .
It may seem that it is "unvarnished truth" to some, but to others it might seem that "whiteman" truly held other races back. At any rate, we need all of the conservative patriots we can muster, no matter their race, creed or?? so we need to keep our discourse civil. I have a problem with political correctness, too, but in this case it is important not to look as if we are arogant because of race. I hope you see my point.
I removed a comment that you made earlier this morning that had severe racial implacations. Please realize that there are many good patriots on this site of all races. We do not allow disparaging comments of this nature ever.
If you have any questions, please contact Ralph or Admin Terri.
I agree with your comments, I myself Retired as an E7 from the Airforce. Veterans need to pull together and start our own party like the SEALs. Without saying to much, I believe we are all being treated like cattle on this site. Most of the stories are cut & paste from other sites. As soon as you put a contriversial topic on the site, the mods are ready with 10 new stories that bury yours. Try it sometime, I only state this because of your statement about this being a chat site with no solutions.
Hello joel, Yes I am one of those conservative's that you are talking about! Great to have you for a friend! Sorry I have not been on here much lately. Had a family member in the hospital. I stay pretty busy online passing along information and signing petitions and sending them to other conservatives fighting for our great Nation! :-)
Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment
House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.
Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.
Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.
Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.
In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.
Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,
Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.
Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.
Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.
The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.
In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.