Ruth Webster
  • San Antonio, TX
  • United States
Share on Facebook
  • Blog Posts
  • Discussions (881)
  • Groups
  • Photos
  • Photo Albums
  • Videos

Ruth Webster's Friends

  • Brian Carlson
  • Hank Jordan
  • Kristi Ann Mod
  • Mangus Colorado

Ruth Webster's Discussions

Anti-Trump Protesters Amp Up Their So-Called "Agenda;" WITH NO PROOF, LIES, & HYSTERIA!!

Started this discussion. Last reply by Alice Hallock Feb 3, 2017. 41 Replies

The Anti-Trumper's have done it again.  President Trump did his job as President, and picked a Supreme Court Associate Nominee who was damned by the Uber-Left BEFORE his name was even released.  Of…Continue


Started Jan 31, 2017 0 Replies

This is a letter I wrote to the Editor of my local paper.  I don't know if they will publish it, but I seriously doubt it.  I am sick of liberal outrage, sick of the game playing, and sick of the…Continue


Started Jan 31, 2017 0 Replies

From Brietbart News, by Joel B. PollackSen. Tim Kaine (D-VA), who was Hillary Clinton’s running mate in the 2016 presidential election, told NBC News’ Meet the Press on Sunday morning that President…Continue

ASHLEY JUDD - Proud of being a "Nasty Woman?"

Started this discussion. Last reply by Kristi Ann Mod Jan 24, 2017. 1 Reply

Yes, Ashley Judd, YOU are a NASTY WOMAN!!!  Your mother is a woman of grace and dignity.  I cannot imagine how she must be feeling about you right now.  I would be loathe to claim you as my own were…Continue

Gifts Received


Ruth Webster has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift


Ruth Webster's Page

Profile Information

Please answer this question: What year was the Declaration of Independence signed?
Do you agree to disagree without being disagreeable?
How did you hear about
I have been a supporter of the Tea Party for many years, since its inception.

However, I am totally disabled and am rarely on Facebook because I loathe social media.
Are you on FaceBook or Twitter?
Is President Trump keeping his campaign promises?
Yes, and he will be OUT of office in ELEVEN MORE MONTHS!

Here is my problem with impeachment:

1. When Bill Clinton was impeached in 1998, he still had to have a trial in the Senate. There would not have been enough votes in the Senate, and House Republians KNEW THAT BEFORE THEY IMPEACHED HIM IN THE HOUSE!!

2. All it did was to create a lot of anger. And THE PEOPLE responded by putting the Democrats in office in 1998!

3. Even if Obama IS impeached, he STILL has to have a trial, and those idiots in the House and Senate have been drinking their purple Kool-Aid (Republicans drink Lemonade!!!)!


There would NOT be enough votes to convict him.
If you are willing to help what would you be willing to do?
I can't help
Will you help the Tea Party by sharing our Polls on Social Sites?

Comment Wall

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

  • No comments yet!



Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service