Rebecca Snider
  • Female
  • Byron, GA
  • United States
Share on Facebook

Rebecca Snider's Friends

  • John Preston Hentz
  • christopher
  • Joseph Nicholas Hite III
  • Rebecca M.
  • Terri
  • Wayne Cowles

Gifts Received


Rebecca Snider has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift


Rebecca Snider's Page

Profile Information

Please answer this question: What year was the Declaration of Independence signed?
Do you agree to disagree without being disagreeable?
How did you hear about
I don't remember where I heard about it, but my mind was thinking we needed another Tea Party several months before I saw this org. THANK YOU !
Is President Trump keeping his campaign promises?
If you are willing to help what would you be willing to do?
Anything I can do to help

Rebecca Snider's Blog

Passive Aggressive Language

Posted on June 13, 2013 at 5:00am 0 Comments

A new word from the "weather" media.. Derecho, have you heard it? Know what it is?  Here ya go. derecho (də-reh-choh, from Spanish: derecho "straight") is a widespread, long-lived, straight-line wind storm that is associated with a fast-moving band of severe thunderstorms. 

Now stop and think about this. Is this unusual ?   Nope... we get them all the time... but SUDDENLY the new word comes up making a line of thunderstorms into something different than…


What a bully

Posted on May 17, 2012 at 2:18pm 0 Comments

Is there any way to get this to STOP before November ???    He is bullying everyone who stands in his way !!!  



President Barack Obama has again threatened the Supreme Court over ObamaCare - this time indicating that if the Court does not rule his way, he will take his revenge on senior…


Comment Wall (3 comments)

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

At 6:21am on June 1, 2013, Phil said…


At 6:20am on June 1, 2013, Phil said…

In response to your post on IRS IGNORES SNIDER

Rebecca.....We aren't going anywhere!!

I signed on to this one a few days ago. I have been on T.P.N. for a long time but I think I like it here more.

You people are a lot more aggressive about sticking up for our constitution.

I'll tell you what.

Keep your eye on the membership numbers and watch them grow.

They've ignited a fire WAY WORSE than the first round.

How dare they make US the enemy in OUR country.

At 2:51pm on March 3, 2012, james seigfreid said…

Hi Rebecca---I do get replies from Chamblis-none ever from Isakson.  And that only occurs when it is a matter of legislation I agree or disagree with...and I think it depends on the mood Chamblis may be in.  I have met him numerous times, spoken with him personally as vice-chairman of the Tea Party of Gilmer County, we have hosted his & Isakson's appearances numerous times as well, but they refuse to do the work that needs to be done.  Not all of what they do is bad or negligent, but the most important issues are ignored.  Panetta, for example.  I raised hell with Saxby about NOT voting for Panetta, pointing out the man's history, and what I got back was a personal note about how long Saxby had worked around him and had known him for a long time blahblahblah and he voted for his confirmation, irregardless of what anyone else thought.  Thank you for the kind reply.---Jim




Political Cartoons by Gary VarvelPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel


Gohmert: Dems Will Drag Out Impeachment — Try To Get ‘Best Socialist’ Nominated For President

During an appearance on Huntsville, AL radio’s WVNN on Thursday, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) offered his best assessment of what House Democrats were trying to accomplish with their impeachment efforts.

Gohmert told WVNN’s “The Jeff Poor Show” impeachment could tie up the Democratic Party’s presidential campaign efforts but predicted Democrats would use the occasion to nominate “the best socialist” they can.

“They would lose in the Senate,” Gohmert said on impeachment. “And besides that, the entire time it was on trial in the Senate, the Democrats who are running for president wouldn’t be allowed to campaign. That’s in the Constitution. They wouldn’t be able to campaign. I just can’t imagine them wanting to do that because if they send it to the Senate, they have now perfectly set up the scenario of 1996, where they will reassure Donald Trump is reelected as president. They don’t want to do that. They’re probably going to drag this thing out as long as they possibly can … through Iowa, through primaries — try to get the best socialist they can to be nominated.”

“Then just end up and say, ‘Now we’re close enough to the general election. We’ve thrown mud at the president through the House,’” he continued. “What they’re really doing — they’re using taxpayer funds to campaign against Trump. That’s all this is — a campaign fund that taxpayers are paying for in order to try to throw mud at the president. I’ll be surprised if they have that vote, but I can’t imagine they want to set up this president for reelection by having a trial in the Senate where they lose.”

Veteran's Day Tribute

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service