Michael Dennis Smith
  • Male
  • Petaluma, CA
  • United States
Share on Facebook

Michael Dennis Smith's Friends

  • Mrs.Tif Morgan
  • Marilyn Calkins
  • Frankmusic
  • Johnny Christensen(GI Joe angel)
  • Rebecca M.
  • Steve Handley
  • Joe Sanchez

Michael Dennis Smith's Groups

Michael Dennis Smith's Discussions

Eminent Disaster

Started this discussion. Last reply by Frankmusic Dec 2, 2017. 6 Replies

In the event of an eminent natural disaster such as a hurricane, we try to to evacuate as many people as possible. I am aware that what I am about to suggest is going to sound ridiculous to some, but…Continue

Gifts Received


Michael Dennis Smith has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift


Michael Dennis Smith's Page

Latest Activity

Michael Dennis Smith replied to Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)'s discussion Treason Now Walks In the Halls of Congress... and Justice is void of conscience and honorable men
"I don't think we have to wonder anymore, why these once great civilizations of the past, no longer exist."
Oct 13
Michael Dennis Smith replied to Mrs.Tif Morgan's discussion There Is a God After All: Jeffrey Epstein Dies a day after Release of Court Documents
"He wasn't convicted yet only accused, and he could have been instrumental in bringing the Clintons to justice.  Another example of "DEAD MEN TELL NO TALES" !"
Aug 11
Michael Dennis Smith replied to Mrs.Tif Morgan's discussion There Is a God After All: Jeffrey Epstein Dies a day after Release of Court Documents
""SHIT HAPPENS" ?     I think you meant  "Clintons Happens" !  "Dead men tell no tales"."
Aug 11

Profile Information

Do you agree to disagree without being disagreeable?
How did you hear about TeaParty.org?
Email forward from Friend
Is President Trump keeping his campaign promises?

Michael Dennis Smith's Blog

loss of communications

Posted on February 19, 2013 at 11:00pm 1 Comment

I have a simple queastion I'm just a simple unarticulate 69 yr.old male American and at the risk of being labled a simpleton my question is : What happens if the Feds find a way if they havn't already to cut off our ability to communicate with one another? There seems to me to be variety of consiquences. What do we do ? or more importantly how do we stop it ?

Comment Wall (2 comments)

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

At 8:11am on June 14, 2013, xps420 said…

i agree they should .!

At 9:56pm on January 10, 2013, Ralph E WallSr said…

Hi Michael,

patriotic welcome


Please check out the following links to help you navigate the site, use the features available for posting and to adjust your settings:





It is always a good idea to join your State Group. You can locate the link to your state:


If you have any problems or questions, feel free to ask any of the staff to help you!




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service