Do you agree to disagree without being disagreeable?
How did you hear about TeaParty.org?
Email forward from Friend
Is President Trump keeping his campaign promises?
I DO Agree --For MANY Reasons, and BEFORE 11/6/12!
More POWER to Sheriff JOE!! -- He's now best Hope (perhaps the ONLY one, since the RNC has NO BACKBONE) -no hope for a felony conviction/Obama, pre-November. BUT if Obama IS ON BALLOT -- Heaven Help Us! -The ACORN & New Black Panther (Via Sosos' money) are certain to Steal Election... Buggered Ballot Counts, etc.,
PLEASE ENCOURAGE Sheriff Joe ... To HURRY!
--Earl Bage (r/w `page'), Lehigh Acres, FL (WWII Army Artillery Vet)
-- In God We Trust --
All “gun ban” “disqualified” that has been passed in 1968 to 1996 violates the rule of the law in the restriction clause: One Constitutional mandate is in ''Article One, Section Nine, Paragraph, 3., which states, ”No bill of attainder, or ex post facto law shall be passed.'' Several cases involving bills of attainder have been adjudicated. Two distinct meanings of the phrase 'bill of attainder' have been established, one being a bill of attainder proper, which is a law permitting the death of a person, without a trial.
The other aspect of a bill of attainder is related to the aspect of the ''doctrine of pains and penalties.'' This type of mandate virtually strips or “disqualified” a citizen of rights, outlawing him, confiscating his property, and denying 'due process' under the law. In the words of Frederic Bastia, bills of attainder are, ''laws that plunder, life, liberty and property.'' (See; ''The Law, Bastiat, Foundation for Economic Education, 1996.) Too many laws today violate the premise of liberal democracy, and fall into the destructive category of being acts of ‘legalism.’ The destructive force of legalism was recognized hundreds of years before America became a Republic. Gun ban and the 1968-1996 gun “ban” falls within this destructive force acts of “legalism” on the Bill of Rights.
In Cummings v. Missouri (1867), states "A bill of attainder, is a legislative act which inflicts punishment without judicial trial and includes any legislative act which takes away the life, liberty or property of a particular named or easily ascertainable person or group of persons because the legislature thinks them guilty of conduct which deserves punishment." (Cited in the USC, as defining cases.) This includes the despicable Lautenberg gun ban 1996. The growing corruption in the legislature, and judiciary reflect a trend to base all American law upon the tyranny of 'Legalism.' The right of private property for the people to retain property above the right of the government to take it without permission has been systematically stripped from American rights.
Democrat Disaster! 53% Of Black Voters, 60% Of Other Minorities Say Liberal Media Trying To Help Democrats Impeach Trump
Thanks to President Donald Trump ALL Americans now know the mainstream fake-news media is an extension of the Democrat Party.
In a recent poll a majority of black voters and minority voters say the media is trying to help Democrats impeach President Trump.
And half of FOX News too, by the way.
CNS News reported:
Both black voters and other minority voters are more convinced than white voters that most reporters are trying to help impeach President Donald Trump, rather than report the news fairly – with a majority of each of the three groups holding that view – a new Rasmussen Reports survey reveals.
In the national voter survey, conducted November 12-13, 53% of all voters said most reporters are trying to help impeach Trump:
“When they write or talk about the impeachment effort, are most reporters trying to help impeach President Trump or block his impeachment? Or are most reporters simply interested in reporting the news in an unbiased manner?”:
“Help impeach President Trump”: 53%
“Block his impeachment”: 8%
Report “news in an unbiased an unbiased manner”: 32%
But, 53% of black voters and 60% of other minorities, compared to 51% of whites, said reporters are trying to get Trump rather than report the news fairly.
Tucker: 'Star' witnesses couldn't point to any high-crimes