"If one truly wants to know about US Constitutional law, Dr Herb Titus is the Constitutional lawyer to see . Dr Herb Titus has been a constitutional lawyer for more then 40 years . Dr Herb Titus was one to the first constitutional lawyer that said…"
"Reberto , it was NEVER LAW because bureaucrats and liberal/socialist judges ignored US Constitutional law and said in their opinion it was law ? As a wise man once said everyone has an opinion but it does not make the opinion LAW ! Since when…"
"Unfortunately Col. Ronald A. Nelson USA Retired you are speaking to the choir ! People who have read and understand the US Constitution know the Fourteenth Amendment was meet so that newly freed slaves could become US Citizens as they were brought…"
Please answer this question: What year was the Declaration of Independence signed?
Do you agree to disagree without being disagreeable?
How did you hear about TeaParty.org?
on the web
Is President Trump keeping his campaign promises?
Barack Hussein Obama is not US Constitutionally qualified to hold office under Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the US Constitution . The election of 2008 was not a legal one and the American people must not rely on the presidential election of 2012 to remove this fraud and usurper .
If you are willing to help what would you be willing to do?
Comment Wall (3 comments)
You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!
OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.
The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.
Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.
The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”
The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.
Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.
Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.
Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.
Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’
Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.