Charles S Imwold
  • Male
  • Rosedale, MD
  • United States
Share on Facebook
Share
  • Blog Posts
  • Discussions (1329)
  • Groups
  • Photos
  • Photo Albums
  • Videos

Charles S Imwold's Friends

  • Thomas Schuckman
  • Diane Logan
  • Steven G. Elliott  1SG USA (RET)
  • Tamsy Freeman
  • Jim Griffin

Gifts Received

Gift

Charles S Imwold has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift

 

Charles S Imwold's Page

Latest Activity

Charles S Imwold replied to Jim Delaney's discussion "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law
"If one truly wants to know about US Constitutional law, Dr Herb Titus is the Constitutional lawyer to see . Dr Herb Titus has been a constitutional lawyer for more then 40 years . Dr Herb Titus was one to the first constitutional lawyer that said…"
Nov 4, 2018
Charles S Imwold replied to Jim Delaney's discussion "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law
"People who enter this country ILLEGALLY have no rights ! They broke the law by crossing our borders ILLEGALLY and it should be a felony instead of a misdemeanor ! "
Nov 3, 2018
Charles S Imwold replied to Jim Delaney's discussion "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law
"Reberto , it was NEVER LAW because bureaucrats and liberal/socialist judges ignored US Constitutional law and said in their opinion it was law ? As a wise man once said everyone has an opinion but it does not make the opinion LAW !  Since when…"
Nov 3, 2018
Charles S Imwold replied to Jim Delaney's discussion "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law
"Unfortunately Col. Ronald A. Nelson USA Retired you are speaking to the choir ! People who have read and understand the US Constitution know the Fourteenth Amendment was meet so that newly freed slaves could become US Citizens as they were brought…"
Nov 2, 2018

Profile Information

Please answer this question: What year was the Declaration of Independence signed?
People
Do you agree to disagree without being disagreeable?
Yes
How did you hear about TeaParty.org?
on the web
Is President Trump keeping his campaign promises?
Barack Hussein Obama is not US Constitutionally qualified to hold office under Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the US Constitution . The election of 2008 was not a legal one and the American people must not rely on the presidential election of 2012 to remove this fraud and usurper .
If you are willing to help what would you be willing to do?
Start discussions

Comment Wall (3 comments)

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

At 4:34pm on January 28, 2013, Diane Logan said…

Thank you, Charles. I try.

At 3:32pm on January 26, 2013, Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) said…

Thank you for your kind words and service Charles... and like all veterans, we must not forget our oath to defend the Constitution against enemies foreign and DOMESTIC. 

Duty, Honor, Country these words resound in the ears of the true patriot... they are the resolve which tempers the mettle of our character... never give up the fight... never give up the Ship.

God bless and stay the course.

At 5:03pm on September 5, 2012, Patriot said…



Hi Charles,

patriotic welcome

WE ARE GLAD YOU HAVE

JOINED US IN OUR FIGHT TO TAKE BACK

AMERICA

Please check out the

following links to help you navigate the site, use the features

available for posting and to adjust your

settings:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/page/member-tips

;;

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/page/website-navigati

on-tips

&;...;

target="_blank">http://teapartyorg.ning.com/group/help-desk/page/

e-mail-settings<;...;

It is always a good idea to join your State Group. You

can locate the link to your state:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/page/state-patriot-gro

ups

<;...;


If you

have any problems or questions, feel free to ask any of the staff to

help you!

 
 
 

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service