Rating:
  • Currently 0/5 stars.

Views: 2911

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Terri Applen on January 19, 2014 at 12:30pm

Apparently the Marine Admiral did send Recon to help them in spite of Obama's negative orders and the Marines were only TWENTY MINUTES OUT when Obama discovered the Admiral's actions. Believe it or not, under threat of death he was ordered to stand down and the Marines were recalled from the mission. Subsequently the Admiral is no longer in his command position, just as so many others have been disposed of by Obama when they refuse to obey this traitor. What will it take for our Military to take a stand as a whole for our Constitution and our Nation?

Comment by M61A1 on December 22, 2013 at 8:54pm

Both obama and hillery are to blame, and to hide it, or as hillery would say "what difference do it make"

I hope no onelet's her forgets her statement.

Comment by camron j fitzsimmons on November 11, 2013 at 8:57pm

This is what we need to be concerned about. It seems on almost every level we have already forgotten about this. We need to remember

Comment by Tom Hansen on October 30, 2013 at 1:37pm

Sounds like high crimes against our countrymen. How can Hilary look at herself.

Comment by Robert Robinson on October 5, 2013 at 7:50pm

Marines should have been at the embassy. I was a Infantry Marine from 2005-2012 never heard of marines being ordered off an embassy. This is a embarrassment to our country letting these men die. 7hours of fighting feels like a eternity I could not imagine no support. Someone will have to answer for their wrong doings. 

Comment by Chaplain Michael Donohoe on August 19, 2013 at 7:55pm

When I look at these two guys I see what real Americans at heart look like.

Comment by Louis Russell Gerald Coleman on August 19, 2013 at 7:29pm

 WHEN THE ABLE DO NOTHING THE ENEMY WILL WIN!

Comment by Donna Rammer, mod on July 20, 2013 at 3:22pm

Im Upset!

Comment by Dixie Lee Smith on May 11, 2013 at 2:43pm

I as a christian voted for Mitt Romney and I still have a feeling he should have won the election. I heard one woman say on TV that she voted 9 times. I believe many more did the same and stole the election. And of course we heard no more about her or her statement. Pray for our Country.                                

2Ch 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.

Comment by Chaplain Michael Donohoe on February 27, 2013 at 11:24am

Obama's only excuse; "The devil made me do it." I just wish I knew why in hell the Christians allowed a communist to get reelected. This is what I think; They could note vote for a Mormon so they did not vote at all. Amazing! What do you think Bush would have done? I can only dream. But I do know these two American heroes would still be alive and a lot more of Obama's friends would be dead.

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service