Information

OathKeepers

Patriots who pledge to defend the Constitution Against All Enemies Foreign and Domestic

Members: 71
Latest Activity: Jul 21, 2017

Discussion Forum

3ozt6gobts7m9

Capital Building is a Mosque

Started by 3ozt6gobts7m9. Last reply by 3ozt6gobts7m9 Nov 14, 2010. 1 Reply

Your infidel taxpayer dollars at work! The dome on Capitol Hill will be gilded in no short order. Where is the separation of mosque and state? Head slap! There s no separation. Mosque is state. (hat…Continue

Victory in November

Started by craig yeargin Oct 25, 2010. 0 Replies

I feel We The People will step up to the plate in November.I have spoken with people from all walks,of life and hear the same thing, that they have had enough !I KNOW I HAVE !!!!!  I have been an…Continue

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of OathKeepers to add comments!

Comment by Heather Rorke on November 27, 2016 at 9:32pm

They are going to try to steal it from us...They want to stop President Trump from his inauguration.... Stop Hillary and the Demoncrats.... Sad to think at one time I was a some what liberal Demoncrat! Then I grew up and started paying taxes.... LOL

Comment by Andrew Skahl on July 17, 2016 at 2:05pm
Thank you for confirming my request to join .. 15 year Army Vet . Cause service never ends
Comment by InfoWarsTV1 on January 1, 2014 at 7:46pm

And so where we are talking about different jurisdictions who's representatives may stand on differing sides of the issues, OathKeepers plays an important role as an adhesive on a national level holding to constitutional enforcement and connecting like-minded individuals.

Comment by Mustang 6 on January 1, 2014 at 5:33pm

That is just 'One' Governor ! In Kansas, WE have the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution and Article 8 of the Kansas Constitution, approved by the US Congress at Statehood !

Comment by Doug Sowle on January 1, 2014 at 12:27am

Info Wars is 100% correct. While it is true the Sheriff is the top LEO, here in the state where the first American Revolution began, our Gov. Duval Patrick, has stated any militia activity is illegal. Say what you will, I have been with Oathkeepers since inception, and while there have been efforts to form militia units in the state, all have resulted in failure.  So whatever you want to use as a title is basically semantics at this point.

Comment by Mustang 6 on December 31, 2013 at 7:56pm

If you believe in the 10 Orders of 'Oath Keepers', and you do not have a County Sheriff who will stand up, THEN you have to be part of a MILITIA !!

Comment by InfoWarsTV1 on December 31, 2013 at 2:52pm

Eric - Sheriffs have come across the country stating that they will NOT enforce gun confiscation. They are elected so they have more control over their situation. They also have the power to deputize as many as they deem necessary. The only requirement presently the join the Oathkeepers is to pay the fee and uphold the Constitution. If it ever came down to it, I am sure they would wave the fee. These are all people who are sworn to uphold the Constitution. This is our main objective here, is it not?

What happened in Nazi Germany was more akin to Obama's pre-election speech where he said we need a domestic force just as strong, just as well funded as our regular military. Everyone clapped and no one knew what the hell he was talking about. He was talking about the brown shirts of the German Socialist Party. This is the "select" militia that you have to be concerned about. As long as the OathKeepers are sworn to uphold the Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights and the Constitution of the United States of America, I will stand with them and be happy to do so because the way our political representatives are systematically dismantling the Constitution, I don't know what we would do without an organization that took their pledge to our Constitutional Republic seriously. This is what ALL American soldiers fought and died for and I for one am glad that there is an organization sworn to assure that they didn't fight and die in vain.

Comment by InfoWarsTV1 on December 31, 2013 at 8:25am

Thank you for being a member. It is a simple concept really. The elite are trying to undermine our political system to implement world government. It's okay to say it, they do:

"... but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault. The hopeful aspect of the present situation is that even as nations resist appeals for "world government" and "the surrender of sovereignty," technological, economic and political interests are forcing them ..." ~ Council on Foreign Relations, Foreign Affairs, April 1974

http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/24506/richard-n-gardner/the-...

I don't know how it could be any more clear. We have domestic enemies involved in policy making. Period. And for the people who keep blaming it on Obama as if once Obama goes away, everything will be fine - it won't Obama is their puppet, the problem is systemic - it will not go away with Obama.

OathKeepers acknowledges the problem is to destroy our political system from within and that they are sworn by Oath to Defend the Constitution.

Comment by Jack Lamberson on December 31, 2013 at 8:00am

Thank you I agree with you.  They are one of the better organizations out there.  I am a member and a Patriot and a active member in my community.  This guy Eric is the first person I have heard go after them that is not, so he claims, part of this illegal regime.

Comment by InfoWarsTV1 on December 31, 2013 at 7:56am

Actually, I THANK GOD FOR THE OATH KEEPERS. It is the one chance we have of holding this country together. God Bless The Oath Keepers, God Bless America.

 

Members (70)

 
 
 

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service