Information

Young Conservatives

(<21yr) This group is to encourage young Americans to learn our founding principles and organize to Restore America.

Members: 52
Latest Activity: Mar 27

Discussion Forum

Do teenagers or young adults care about our Country?

Started by Alec Reid Wilson. Last reply by Rachel Oct 29, 2013. 16 Replies

LETS MORE THEN JUST TALK

Started by Liz R. Last reply by Liz R Aug 18, 2011. 3 Replies

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Young Conservatives to add comments!

Comment by Robert J. Lynch on January 3, 2014 at 2:11am

Hi everyone, just found this group.  I hope you consider 33 young!!  Read some comments sounds like there are some great people in here!  Great to meet you all.

"Blood is freedom's stain"   -Iron Maiden

Comment by John Lepera on December 20, 2011 at 8:01pm

I wanted to announce my new book:

Christian TEA Party – Tough Evangelical Activist

There are free chapter samples at www.SpiritImpact.org.

Hopefully you will find it very interesting and helpful.

Thank you,

Pastor John

Comment by Cameron Williams on September 9, 2011 at 4:27pm
just joined. this group is great!
Comment by brad on August 8, 2011 at 4:26pm
like i said in my last comment 55% is to much to cut. cause theres people out there who really need it. so i think it should be 35%
Comment by brad on August 7, 2011 at 5:32pm
Obama is a damn idiot, honestly instead of lowering our downgrade he should cut welfare by 55% . so people like us don't pay taxes for people to sit on there ass all day with these brand new 2011 escalade. im 15 and i know what to do. too much to say for the President
Comment by Robert F. Stewart on June 26, 2011 at 12:48pm
DEFEND TEXAS NOW!! PROTEST JULY 9th 2011 Downtown Austin Texas

PROTEST INFORMATION!!! PLEASE PASS ALONG TO OTHER PATRIOTS, BOTH IN TEXAS AND AROUND THE COUNTRY!! LETS SHOW UP AT EVERY SINGLE CAPITAL IN THE NATION!!



Defend Texas NOW!!

7/9/11 SATURDAY 8:00 AM

South East Corner of W 11th Street and Congress Ave.

Mexican Military Incursion Protest - Community Awareness
Downtown Austin SIDEWALKS in front of State Captial Building.
THIS IS A THREAT TO OUR NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY!!

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2010/mar/mexican-military-incursi...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11226144/ns/us_news-security/t/mexican-...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rk4QGHj1bqM

Here are notes concerning the law and behaviour during protest-PLEASE READ
http://www.ci.austin.tx.us/pace/prodemopick.htm

The Use of a Sidewalk for: Protest, Demonstration or Picketing
Protesting, demonstrations or picketing activities that uses the public sidewalk do not require a permit from the City.

There are rules that you must follow so as not to violate several laws:

You can not block the sidewalk where it prevents the use by other citizens
You can not block ingress or egress to the doors of the building
You can not block driveways from the street to the property
You can not set up tables or other obstructions on the sidewalk
You can not get into the street for any reason
You can not get on “private property” without the permission of the property owner
Careful consideration to the wording and/ or graphics that are placed on posters or signs should be considered. Threatening, vulgar or pornographic; words or images could prompt other citizens to complain causing police action.
Banners or signs may not be hung off of or attached to bridges over roadways; signs may be carried while walking on sidewalks over bridges.
To request the use of a public street to hold "March", a Parade Permit is required 10 days prior to the date of the event. Parade Permits are approved by APD – Special Events. The permit is at web site: http://www.ci.austin.tx.us/police/parade.htm.

PLEASE RESPECT THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES - THOSE WHO DO NOT WILL BE ASKED TO LEAVE.

NO WEAPONS
NO RACIST, THREATENING SIGNAGE - please stay on issue.
NO FIGHTING OR FIGHTING WORDS WITH PASSERSBY. - Keep You Head.

ALSO: BRING WATER - STAY HYDRATED

WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE A LOT OF:

The TEXAS FLAG

The ALAMO FLAG (Come and Take It)

People Dressed Like the Alamo Defenders.

Drummers

Veterans of US Military IN UNIFORM

INVITE your Conservative Latino-American friends!!

Signs like these:

DEFEND TEXAS NOW!

MEXICAN MILITARY ON US SOIL IS AN ACT OF WAR

MEXICAN MILITARY OR DRUG SMUGGLER? WHO KNOWS??

PERRY SEAL THE BORDER NOW!
TROOPS!! TO THE BORDER NOW!!

(For other signs, PLEASE use you imagination WISELY! See rules above from City - lets not get the Cops all worked up.)
Comment by Thomas W e r n e r Nufer on May 3, 2011 at 12:47pm

1776 Nuoffer-Nufer  Gerlingen-Weilimdorf

head :India sugar -USA salt

Stuttgart - Hohenzollern1

Baden11

 

Comment by Johnny R. Roulett on March 27, 2011 at 5:23pm

Stand tall and strong until the last breath from my body, inwhich I will then enter into the Kingdom of our Lord.

 

Comment by Johnny R. Roulett on March 11, 2011 at 4:46pm

Christ~Is~King

America is a Christian Country

Comment by josh little on October 26, 2010 at 9:23am
AMEN BUDDY THERE IS NOT ENOUGH O US WE NEED TO STND UP AND STAND TALL
 

Members (52)

 
 
 

LIGHTER SIDE

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

Political Cartoons by Mike Lester

ALERT ALERT

Newt Says What The Rest Of Us Are Thinking:
It’s Time To Throw Peter Strzok In Jail

Disgraced FBI special agent Peter Strzok, a senior member of the bureau who gained notoriety in recent months over his anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, was grilled for nearly 10 hours during a joint congressional committee hearing on Thursday.

At issue was Strzok’s anti-Trump texts to former FBI lawyer and lover Lisa Page that coincided with his leading of the investigations into both former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server scandal and the alleged Trump/Russia 2016 election collusion, as well as his involvement in the subsequent Robert Mueller special counsel probe.

The hearing proved to be a heated battle, as Strzok displayed an arrogant smugness in defiance of pointed questions from Republicans that he largely danced around, while Democrats sought to upend and undermine the entire hearing with a plethora of interruptions, parliamentary maneuvers and outright praise for the man who helped let Clinton off the hook while ferociously targeting Trump.

Former House speaker and presidential candidate Newt Gingrich was less than impressed with Strzok’s performance and cooperation in the hearing and suggested during an appearance on Fox Business that the FBI agent should be held in contempt of Congress.

“I think they have to move to hold him in contempt and throw him in jail,” Gingrich said of Congress and Strzok.

“This is a person who is willfully standing up and refusing to appear as a congressional witness and he was a government employee at the time,” he continued.

“He has every obligation to inform the legislative branch, and I don’t think they have any choice except to move a motion of contempt because he is fundamentally — and so is his girlfriend (Page) — they’re both fundamentally in violation of the entire constitutional process,” he added.

Page had been subpoenaed to appear before Congress on Wednesday but refused to appear, saying she’d been unable to review relevant documents prior to the scheduled hearing, a closed-door hearing that has since been rescheduled for Friday.

Gingrich was not the only one who thought Strzok deserved to be held in contempt of Congress, as House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte informed Strzok that he remained at risk of such during the hearing, according to The Daily Caller.

That warning from Goodlatte came after Strzok had refused to answer a straightforward question posed by House Oversight Committee chairman Trey Gowdy, regarding how many people Strzok had personally interviewed between a specific set of dates in relation to the Clinton email investigation.

“Mr. Strzok, please be advised that you can either comply with the committee’s direction to answer the question or refuse to do so,” Goodlatte stated. “The latter of which will place you in risk of a contempt citation and potential criminal liability. Do you understand that? The question is directed to the witness.”

Strzok still refused to answer, citing instructions received from his counsel and the FBI to not answer certain questions on certain topics.

Goodlatte replied, “Mr. Strzok, in a moment we will continue with the hearing, but based on your refusal to answer the question, at the conclusion of the day we will be recessing the hearing and you will be subject to recall to allow the committee to consider proceeding with a contempt citation.”

It is unclear if Goodlatte and the committee ultimately did consider a contempt citation for Strzok following the contentious hearing, nor is it clear if Page will be held in contempt for blowing off her subpoenaed appearance on Wednesday.

Hopefully Congress will follow through on the threats of contempt followed by actual jail time against Strzok and Page in response to their uncooperative behavior and failure to appear when subpoenaed, if only to ensure that future witnesses called before Congress for sensitive or contentious hearings don’t think they can get away with the same sort of behavior.

TEA PARTY TARGET

Cops Sent To Seize Veteran’s Guns Without A Warrant, He Refused To Turn Them Over

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” says Leonard Cottrell, after successfully staving off law enforcement and the courts from confiscating his firearms. Cottrell, an Iraq War veteran, was at work when he received a phone call from his wife. The cops were there, busting in to take his guns away. It all started after a casual conversation his son had at school.

Ammoland reports:

Police said their visit was sparked by a conversation that Leonard Cottrell Jr.’s 13-year-old son had had with another student at the school. Cottrell said he was told his son and the other student were discussing security being lax and what they would have to do to escape a school shooting at Millstone Middle School.

The conversation was overheard by another student, who went home and told his parents, and his mother panicked. The mom then contacted the school, which contacted the State Police, according to Cottrell.

The visit from the troopers came around 10 p.m. on June 14, 2018, Cottrell said, a day after Gov. Phil Murphy signed several gun enforcement bills into law.

After several hours, Cottrell said police agreed not to take the guns but to allow him to move them to another location while the investigation continued.

“They had admitted several times that my son made no threat to himself or other students or the school or anything like that,” he said.

Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was “not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing.”

The troopers searched his son’s room and found nothing, Cottrell said.

“To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” he said. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

“In the Garden State, the usual approach is to confiscate first and ask questions later, and victims of this approach often don’t know their rights. ‎In this case, the victim pushed back and confiscation was avoided — but the circumstances surrounding the incident are outrageous. A student expressing concern over lack of security is not a reason to send police to the student’s home — but it might be a reason to send police to the school to keep students and teachers safe” said Scott L. Bach, executive director of the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs and a member of the NRA board of directors.

NJ.com adds:

Cottrell, a disabled U.S. Army veteran who served three tours during “Operation Iraqi Freedom,” owns a shotgun and a pistol. He has all the correct permits to own the firearms, he said, and predominately uses the shotgun to hunt.

He said his wife allowed the officers to enter the home, and with her permission, they searched his son’s room — but they did not find any weapons, he said. The officers, he said, didn’t have a warrant but still wanted to take his guns. Cottrell wouldn’t let them.

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” he said Thursday.

He said the attempted seizure resulted because of a new law Gov. Phil Murphy signed into law that makes it easier for police to confiscate guns when someone in the state poses a threat to themselves or others. The law is part of a broader statewide effort to make New Jersey’s gun laws even tougher amid the national outcry for more gun control in the wake of the school shooting in Parkland, Florida.

Cottrell said the officers “danced around the issue” when he confronted them about the new law.

A New Jersey State Police spokesman declined to answer questions about whether this incident had anything to do with the new gun laws.

In an email, Sgt. First Class Jeff Flynn said, “Troopers responded to Mr. Cottrell’s residence in reference to the report of a possible school threat. Based on their investigation, it was determined that Mr. Cottrell’s weapons did not need to be seized.”

David Codrea, writing for Ammoland, further added:

To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” New Jersey gun owner and Army veteran Leonard Cottrell Jr. told New Jersey 101.5 after a June 14 visit from State Police,. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

Cottrell was recalling state troopers showing up at his door to confiscate firearms after his 13-year-old son was overheard discussing lax school safety with a friend.

Indoctrinated by a pervasive snitch culture — one that never seems to deter the blatantly obvious demonic nutjobs — the eavesdropping student told his parents, who told school administrators, who in turn called the cops. (Note “If you see something, say something” carries risks of its own – if you report the wrong person, you could end up smeared as a “hater.”)

“Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was ‘not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing,’” the report continued. Despite that, his home is now a “gun free zone” and that has been publicized by the media. He has, in fact, willingly ceded those rights, and by his own words in order to make authorities “happy.”

Before judging him for that, consider the environment that is New Jersey. Then consider the overwhelming force the state can bring to bear, and its predisposition to using it, especially if it’s to enforce citizen disarmament. It’s easy to anonymously declare “Molon Labe” on the internet. In meatspace, resistance is more effective when the aggressor doesn’t get to dictate the time and place, especially if that place is your home and you have family inside.

Appeasing gun-grabbers, generally couched as “compromise,” is impossible. It’s like throwing a scrap of flesh to a circling pack of jackals and expecting them to be sated and leave you alone — instead of sensing opportunity and fear, and moving in closer.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service