Information

Wyoming Tea Party

Marked by the State Seal, this page is for organizing events and outreach for all of the Wyoming Regions. This state group is intended for Wyoming Patriots with focused discussion, events and attendance possibilities.

Members: 25
Latest Activity: Jun 10, 2014

Discussion Forum

This group does not have any discussions yet.

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Wyoming Tea Party to add comments!

Comment by Remelle E. Burton on April 16, 2014 at 8:54pm

hey I need new Tea Party bumper stickers and clothes etc.  where can I get them?

Comment by Nancy on November 23, 2013 at 6:27pm

Attention All Wyoming Patriots--please consider joining the conversation about Wyoming's upcoming 2014 elections @ 

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/group/election-2014/forum/topics/wyomin...

Please post any/all info regarding federal/state candidates for everyone's consideration--thanks for your help and participation :)

Comment by John Wind Bell on March 27, 2010 at 3:25pm
http://hubpages.com/hub/Obama-ness
No wonder Castro likes Obama ......DUH !
They are great 'bed-fellows.'
Comment by Anthony Bowler on February 5, 2010 at 7:49am
I would like to see a couple of things happen locally.

1. Stop the changing of plates every time the design is changed. Vehicles just don't last that long (eventually the older plates will be phased out just by vehicle phasing out).. It is an uneeded expense to change out these plates like just happened. In my particular case the plates were a couple of years old, and now are not any good. This is an uneeded expense to the people of WY. Just let us keep the plates we have. Any new vehicles can get the newly designed plates. When simply re-registering, the just change out the tags. This will save us a lot of money, because no matter how you look at it we the people are paying for these plates.
2. Stop making and requiring two plates. This is silly. Most cars do not have a way to mount the front plate. It is an uneeded expense. I don't know of any other state that hasn't seen the light in regards to this. Most people I have talked to are annoyed by it, but since it is the law, they just except it. We should (in my opinion) be asking ourselves if laws are reasonable, and if not we should be changing them.
Comment by Bob J Criswell on January 25, 2010 at 3:38pm
Check out how bias the News Media has been http://www.mrc.org/specialreports/uploads/obamaomit.pdf
Comment by Rick A. Sylvester on January 24, 2010 at 6:17pm
Wish we could put that clip on public tv and see what kind of response would occur....
Comment by Bob J Criswell on January 24, 2010 at 3:19pm
Comment by Rick A. Sylvester on January 24, 2010 at 1:02pm
I grew up in WY and I am ashamed of the way special interest groups have been able to take over and dictate what happens to the resources and ultimately the people living here. They seem to have the loudest voices no matter what the majority of people believe.
Comment by Bob J Criswell on January 21, 2010 at 8:55pm
Comment by Bob J Criswell on January 20, 2010 at 4:45pm
Sign the petition to have Scott seated at once. http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/seatscottbrown/
 

Members (25)

 
 
 

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

judicialwatch.org
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service