Lets start working people, this is communist territory and every day is a day we need..

Lots up for stake this year.

Cantwell must GO.

Lots of communists n congress here.

If we can carry king county for the gop we can carry the STATE.

 

Views: 186

Replies to This Discussion

Hi Neil…I'm a proud Tea Party member, but not actually 'active' as far as going to meetings go.  Do you know of anything going on in the Everett area?

There will be, can I get you to add me on FB?

 

 

Always remember the first rule of power tactics (pps.127-134):
1. "Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have."
2. "Never go outside the expertise of your people. When an action or tactic is outside the experience of the people, the result is confusion, fear and retreat.... [and] the collapse of communication.
3. "Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy. Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
4. "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity."
5. "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counteract ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage."
6. "A good tactic is one your people enjoy."
7. "A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. Man can sustain militant interest in any issue for only a limited time...."
8. "Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose."
9. "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself."
10. "The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign."
11. "If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside... every positive has its negative."
12. "The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative."
13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.  In conflict tactics there are certain rules that [should be regarded] as universalities. One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and 'frozen.'...

 

I am just posting this here for future reference.

 

1740$ to put a candidate on the ticket, minus 1 dollar for every signature gathered. 10 seats in congress up for grabs with only one good candidate so far.(Dick Muri)..

Looking for 9 patriots...

 

Can you help me gather signatures and find candidates for congress in november?

1700 signatures to get someone on the ballot for free and it doesnt matter what district you live in.. I could email you the form.

Filing deadline is 2nd week in may, 13th IIRC.
 
Diane Thomas said:

Hi Neil…I'm a proud Tea Party member, but not actually 'active' as far as going to meetings go.  Do you know of anything going on in the Everett area?

Who are you trying to get on the ballot?

Neil Murphy said:

Can you help me gather signatures and find candidates for congress in november?

1700 signatures to get someone on the ballot for free and it doesnt matter what district you live in.. I could email you the form.

Filing deadline is 2nd week in may, 13th IIRC.
 
Diane Thomas said:

Hi Neil…I'm a proud Tea Party member, but not actually 'active' as far as going to meetings go.  Do you know of anything going on in the Everett area?

As of now, anyone I can.

10 real people who believe in the bill of rights and small government...

I just hate to let the deadline go by in May without qualifying a full slate of guys.

The GOP here is just a bunch of chumps, we should have real conservatives on the ballot. Real people in every district.

 

Is the petition like the petitions for Referendums?   I have signed a bunch of those.

And do you canvass neighborhoods seeking signatures, or set up in front of stores (like they do for petitions to get a referendum on the ballot)?

Like everyone else my time is short 'cause I am self employed and (thank you Jesus) work lots of hours.  That's what I am doing up so late tonight, finishing a project.

There is a 1740$ filing fee, but for every signature we get it is 1$ less. The form is on wa.gov, I am collecting signatures for myself but I want to be gathering for 10 guys at once and get it all. 

If you will run for congress I ill get signatures for you.

At the very least it will give us a good chance to badmout obama/cantwell/all things democrat until the election.

 


 
Diane Thomas said:

Is the petition like the petitions for Referendums?   I have signed a bunch of those.

And do you canvass neighborhoods seeking signatures, or set up in front of stores (like they do for petitions to get a referendum on the ballot)?

Like everyone else my time is short 'cause I am self employed and (thank you Jesus) work lots of hours.  That's what I am doing up so late tonight, finishing a project.

Oh Lordy, my husband would have a fit!  This may sound like a cop out, but he will tell you we don't have enough time together as it is.  Actually I am a far better conduit for the dissemination of factual information.

I didn't get really interested in politics until ObamaCare was in the works.  It's like God laid this burden on my heart to study the bill, learn the truth and send it out.  I went to a couple of town hall meetings.  The one here in Everett with Rick Larsen was interesting because he and I went round and round about the section that states the Feds will have access to our financial records to "determine if we are financially responsible to pay our portion of the bill 'at the time of service'".  I didn't get the opportunity to go a round with Inslee, the self-righteous, 'how great I am' typical Democrat at his town hall meeting.  And now he has abandoned his constituents to run for Governor.

My best role is behind the scene.  Working with a campaign, donating my graphic design abilities…and I could even spend some time gathering signatures on a petition.  I am not shy when it comes to talking with people.

I would be grateful any signatures you can get for me...

How can you carry King county? even the dead democrats vote there.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service