Information

Washington Tea Party

Marked by the State Seal, this page is for organizing events and outreach for all of the Washington Regions. This state group is intended for Washington Patriots with focused discussion, events and attendance possibilities. If you are not a resident of the State of Washington, please remove yourself from this group by clicking on the link that says, 'Leave Group.'

Mindy Robinson, State Director

Members: 121
Latest Activity: Jul 7, 2015

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Washington Tea Party to add comments!

Comment by Priscilla Blais on February 15, 2013 at 5:42pm

Is Thurston County Sheriffs going to support the Second Amendment? I called but did not get an answer, yet? What is the difference between Sheriff Association and Police chief and Constitutional Sheriffs (does it apply in this State). If all hell breaks lose, where do we go for a safe haven.

Comment by Oleg Gielman on January 27, 2013 at 7:31pm

Constitutional Sheriffs needs our help in making then publishing a list of Constitutional Sheriffs (the current list is in the attached file):

Current%20List%20of%20Constitutional%20Sheriffs.rtf

From: Constitutional Sheriffs

Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 12:57 PM

Subject: Here is a working draft of Constitutional sheriffs around the country

Attention all members here is a working draft of Constitutional sheriffs around the country. I would like to ask each of you to assist me in adding more sheriffs to the list

that have told you or have announced their intentions to honor their oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In order to honor their oath they must refuse to enforce unconstitutional legislation and executive orders.

If each of you would send me the names of the county sheriffs in your county that

should be listed as defenders of the Constitution. Please send them to me at: wibcom@aol.com  Thx Col: Ronald Adler

USCDA HQ

 

Visit Constitutional Sheriffs at: http://constitutionalsheriffs.ning.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

Comment by John Taylor on June 28, 2012 at 4:56pm

Today we got betrayed!
Not just by the weasel Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, but by Republican Governor Candidate Rob McKenna.   Rob gave an interview later in the afternoon in which he stated he is against the repeal of Obamacare and the mandate (Tax) that you must buy medical insurance.  I sent McKenna an email to remove me from his mailing list.  The Tea Party should all send McKenna a message that agreeing with Nancy Pelosi is not the kind of person we want as Governor of Washington. I'm voting Libertarian in the fall for Governor.  We can put Weasel in front of McKenna's name as well. 

Comment by Linda Ward on April 1, 2012 at 8:10am

Hello and I am glad to have joined. 

Comment by americanmobi on March 7, 2012 at 3:42am

WE NEED TO GET THE MESSAGE OUT IF MORE AMERICANS DONT HELP PAY FOR WHAT THEY GET FREE FROM AMERICA, HOW DO YOU THINK AMERICA CAN SURVIVE ? WE MUST GO MOBILE NOW !  americanmobi

Comment by Frank K. Ani, Jr. on March 3, 2012 at 10:41pm

Good Day Fellow Patriots:

I received an email from Greg Woodworth of the Tacoma 912 group this morning advising me of the back stabbing, underhanded end run that our politicians in Olympia just pulled..

The Wood Stove ban that we thought was dead and buried came back to life today and was voted into law.  SB 6102 was killed, but it's counterpart, HB 2326 was still lurking out there.

While the immediate impact is on a small part of the state in Pierce County, it's implications are statewide.

According to State Senator Mike Carrell (Republican) he described what he/they were faced with in Olympia today:  In Pierce County, we found ourselves in a catch 22. Either the EPA (federal government) takes Draconian measures or we do something locally to mitigate the problems.

Even though he voted against it, a majority of senators voted for it, believing that they were acting in our best interest, it seems that selling out the American People according to our politicians is always in their best interest (oops I mean our best interest)

Fellow Patriots if this is happening in Washington State it has to be happening in many other states as well. If you have contacts in other states alert them NOW!

If you have any thoughts email me or please feel free to email or call me.

Comment by Glenn Byron Jones on January 31, 2012 at 3:13pm

I do not beleave that Congress has the lowest rateings in the USA. I think that the SENATE does. All this rateings are a Democratic means to control the vote.

Comment by Glenn Byron Jones on January 31, 2012 at 3:04pm

Are we so strapped that we can only send up Deno Rossi and Paty Murry? Thay have no difference in Washington and only support the same people and have never done nothing agienst illigals ever.

Comment by Glenn Byron Jones on January 31, 2012 at 2:53pm

Well it seems that we need a multapul guoup meetings thruout the state. Places like Seattle,,Tricities ,, Vancover ,, and Walla Walla and have every one come out at the same time. Travel ,,, Meet People,,, Become involved The last place we need to gather is Olimpia.

Comment by Glenn Byron Jones on January 31, 2012 at 12:33am

Washington State ,, Expecialy hear in Walla Walla seem to be holding town meetings the trot out the local town machine and have a kind of socialest agenda. There was a man talking about budget and in it he was talking about (GRANTS) every time someone tryed to expose theise GRANTs as ear marks. Thay were told to hold their comments until the speaker was finished. Of course when the speaker was finished he promply said he had to be else where and left leaveing those in the room with word smithing. Iwould like some one to check the background of these so called leaders.

 
 
 

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

judicialwatch.org
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service