I often wonder as I go on my little tangents about Saul Alinsky and the radical left if I am saying anything new or informative. With the discovery of Alinsky, Marxism and the left in general all came into view for me during the first term of president Obama. His first term coincided with my second year of college, and his admission of seeking out the Marxists and Structural Feminists was pretty intriguing to me. I guess you could say I owe him a little gratitude because if he had never said that I would have never been interested.

I felt compelled to say this because while I thought all of this was new information I realized during a particular tea party meeting that many people have known about the radical organizer for a long time. That’s when I also realized his radical ways were nothing new and in fact may be material worth nothing more than a yawn to some people. However, sometimes I feel that I can bring an interesting twist by highlighting how some of his “rules” are being employed in daily events and this is what I enjoy sharing with you

Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/05/alinsky-rules-communist-goals-and...

Views: 135

Replies to This Discussion

Ralph, anytime you can post knowledge and one person be enlightened, it is good because ignorance is what allowed communism to get a foot hold in America.

Keep it up.

You're absolutely right.  And while it has been known for a long time, I am encouraged to find out that more and more people are finding out about Communism in America.  Because I know that you are one less person that they can corrupt and brainwash.

"An informed citizenry is the only true repository of the public will." Thomas Jefferson

Towards the end on the "Communization Process", many will begin to see the light. But as has happened in the past with other nations....it's been too late... We need ideas and an action plan...


What I think is amazing is how much they have infiltrated the Christian and Catholic faith. Priests learn Social Justice and Philosophy in seminary instead of the Bible..

Perhaps we should begin to group the 45 goals and bring them up to date !1

Thats an excellent idea...




Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco


OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.


© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service