Information

Patriot Boots

Members: 94
Latest Activity: Jun 24, 2016

These boots are made for walking...

We hear boots on the ground and now we need them.  Time for these Patriot Boots to start walking all over the government for a change.  C'mon Patriot Boots, let's do some walking...


 

 

 

 

We will be watching this page daily to see what is being proposed.

FEDERAL REGISTER DAILY

 

Discussion Forum

Dual Sovereignty

Started by cm miller. Last reply by Russ Hinds Feb 8, 2013. 3 Replies

Second Amendment Related

Started by Terri. Last reply by M-AR-15-5.56X45! Feb 26, 2014. 5 Replies

Health Care Related

Started by Terri. Last reply by Ralph Fucetola Feb 5, 2013. 3 Replies

Immigration Related

Started by Terri. Last reply by Clay Thomas Jul 12, 2015. 1 Reply

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Patriot Boots to add comments!

Comment by Megan Howard on November 27, 2013 at 1:22pm

I think one of the best ways to ensure a proper education is home-schooling.  My mom home-schooled both me and my sister, and after hearing all the things my public-schooled teammates have said about their school and experiencing a boy high on drugs at a high-school field, I'm glad my parents chose this path for my sister and I.

Comment by Ralph Baker on October 20, 2013 at 4:26pm

To J Horne:

I agree that a proper education is the key.  I just don't know how we're going to do it.

Somehow we have to stop rewarding the progressives that are teaching our children while we get them properly educated.

If you haven't seen these links before, they are from an Russian agent that defected to the U.S.  He talks specificity about what needs to be done with the up coming generation.


Former Russian Agent: Public Schools Targeted!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDDBZuheQxs

Yuri Bezmenov (former kgb) Psychological Warfare Subversion & Control of Western Society - Complete

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZnkULuWFDg

Soviet Subversion of the Free World Press, 1984 - Complete

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cnf0I2dQ0i0

Comment by J Horne on October 20, 2013 at 8:42am

Ralph, I believe you are correct - the left wing student robots like the SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) always try to interrupt a conservative speaker.  It is standard practice for the left, because they don't want the truth to get out.  

But I meant that we "The Tea Party" need to "adopt a school, college, or university" [preferably one that has a student conservative group] and get them to bring more conservative speakers to the campuses.  They can't be everywhere at once.  

And if the student conservative body speaks to the school administrators ahead of time before any conservative speakers arrive, we can hold the school accountable for keeping the lefty students under control and not allowing them to interrupt.

They don't want our message to get out, because they are afraid of what will happen if the truth gets out.  We need to push hard!  

That is something that we all can engage in.  They did the same thing to us back in the 1960's... Let's give them a taste of their own medicine!!!

Comment by Ralph Baker on October 20, 2013 at 5:44am

The only problem has been that the left gets their progressive student robots to stop those speakers from speaking or interferes with their talks.

It may be time to stop donating to these institutions and stop them from getting tax dollars and tax exemptions.

Comment by J Horne on October 19, 2013 at 9:08pm

Here is my strategy:

Recruit College Students!!! There are colleges that have Conservative Groups!  Get them to start requesting conservative speakers to there campuses which will push our values on the administrators. Then they will realize that we aren't allowing our kids to be brainwashed by people like Bill Ayers!

Children are the future, but the left has been into them for a lot longer than us.  We need to get our kids back from the left!!!

Comment by Ralph Baker on July 25, 2013 at 2:09pm

The real beginning to the solution is in the two following video clips.

I will warn you.  It involves the nuts and bolts of American politics, so they're boring, but, short and absolutely right.

The last link is to the host site, which if we all go together and used in our political tool box, would make a world of difference.


The "True Business of the Precincts" Part 1

http://www.unitedprecinctsofamerica.org/content/true-business-precincts-part-1

The "True Business of the Precincts" Part 2

http://www.unitedprecinctsofamerica.org/content/true-business-precincts-part-2

Welcome to United Precincts of America!

Are you ready to accept the challenge and be American?

The U.S. Constitution is irrelevant without the means of enforcement. The means of enforcement is the Precinct Strategy... the True Business of the Precincts. The Enforcer..? We the People! ― Phil Glass

http://www.unitedprecinctsofamerica.org/

Comment by MORTON STEVENSON on July 24, 2013 at 11:13pm

I have been to every act, Tea Party and JBS. So far none have any strategy other than complaining except the JBS. We are having a strategy meeting this Friday. We need action plans that has teeth. The church I go to is the same way. I have talked to some of the Tea Party leadership and they say no ones wants to take action.  Just a very small amount. These communist are not playing games. If they have they way we will all be in camps soon. What amazes me the Mormons and Jehovah witnesses will go door to door. But no one at the Tea Party will. Or ACT. Or Christians. None for there country.

What will you do for your country and familys future?

We are not doing enough. We should be attacking this problem. Attacking them the enemy. The Marxist. 

Comment by Michael Wolf Heart. on July 24, 2013 at 4:28pm

I'll be more active here once i get moved into my new place . Have a place here in Austin,TX & Will be returning to New Mexico to rebuild my place there. Moving back and fourth is a real pain !

Comment by Ralph Baker on April 23, 2013 at 2:49pm

To Mr. Stevenson,

I understand your frustration, but, there are many people doing stuff.  The gun bill is shoved aside for now, it didn't do that because people did nothing.

They haven't signed the UN Small Arms treaty, that Obama is salivating over. because people are doing nothing.

In Florida, "True the Vote" is still working it's way through the Florida courts, trying to hold the vote cheaters accountable for the vote fraud that stole the election from Allen West.  Not to long ago they needed a lot of donations to proceed and they got what they needed because people donated.

They are still trying the remove Sheriff Joe Arpaio and they haven't yet, because, when he needed funds to defend himself people donated.

People are doing what they can, the question is, what are you doing.

President Obama owns the White house and The Senate.  We have some wimps in the Republican Party.

In 2014, we can take the Senate and keep the house, but, probably throwing out some of the RINOs may be as important, it will give the others the feeling that there is no place to hide.

Petitions are a pain in the butt, because it takes so many of them to get the bad guys to even hesitate.  But, so far petitions, have been effective in slowing them down.

How many have you signed?

Representatives need to be called, how many have you called?

True the Vote, Judicial Watch, Campaign for liberty, FreedomWorks and many other organizations could use some donations, as little as ten dollars.  How many have you donated to?

Wild Bill for America has suggested that, five or ten people in their local area, get together and do some protesting. 

Lined up any people in your area yet?

Do complain about complaining, find something to do!

Comment by Shirley Williams on April 23, 2013 at 12:12pm

We must be doing something. Gun control got stopped. If we loose seats in 2014 and do not take the senate that may change. Now on to amnesty. 

 

Members (94)

 
 
 

LIGHTER SIDE

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Lisa Benson

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

ALERT ALERT

FBI Text Should Alarm Every American

Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, the reported FBI lovebirds, are the poster children for the next “Don’t Text and Investigate” public service ads airing soon at an FBI office near you.

Their extraordinary texting affair on their government phones has given the FBI a black eye, laying bare a raw political bias brought into the workplace that agents are supposed to check at the door when they strap on their guns and badges.

It is no longer in dispute that they held animus for Donald Trump, who was a subject of their Russia probe, or that they openly discussed using the powers of their office to “stop” Trumpfrom becoming president. The only question is whether any official acts they took in the Russia collusion probe were driven by those sentiments.

The Justice Department’s inspector general is endeavoring to answer that question.

For any American who wants an answer sooner, there are just five words, among the thousands of suggestive texts Page and Strzok exchanged, that you should read.

That passage was transmitted on May 19, 2017. “There’s no big there there,” Strzok texted.

The date of the text long has intrigued investigators: It is two days after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein named special counsel Robert Mueller to oversee an investigation into alleged collusion between Trump and the Russia campaign.

Since the text was turned over to Congress, investigators wondered whether it referred to the evidence against the Trump campaign.

This month, they finally got the chance to ask. Strzok declined to say — but Page, during a closed-door interview with lawmakers, confirmed in the most pained and contorted way that the message in fact referred to the quality of the Russia case, according to multiple eyewitnesses.

The admission is deeply consequential. It means Rosenstein unleashed the most awesome powers of a special counsel to investigate an allegation that the key FBI officials, driving the investigation for 10 months beforehand, did not think was “there.”

By the time of the text and Mueller’s appointment, the FBI’s best counterintelligence agents had had plenty of time to dig. They knowingly used a dossier funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign — which contained uncorroborated allegations — to persuade the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court to issue a warrant to monitor Trump campaign adviser Carter Page (no relation to Lisa Page).

They sat on Carter Page’s phones and emails for nearly six months without getting evidence that would warrant prosecuting him. The evidence they had gathered was deemed so weak that their boss, then-FBI Director James Comey, was forced to admit to Congress after being fired by Trump that the core allegation remained substantially uncorroborated.

In other words, they had a big nothing burger. And, based on that empty-calorie dish, Rosenstein authorized the buffet menu of a special prosecutor that has cost America millions of dollars and months of political strife.

The work product Strzok created to justify the collusion probe now has been shown to be inferior: A Clinton-hired contractor produced multiple documents accusing Trump of wrongdoing during the election; each was routed to the FBI through a different source or was used to seed news articles with similar allegations that further built an uncorroborated public narrative of Trump-Russia collusion. Most troubling, the FBI relied on at least one of those news stories to justify the FISA warrant against Carter Page.

That sort of multifaceted allegation machine, which can be traced back to a single source, is known in spy craft as “circular intelligence reporting,” and it’s the sort of bad product that professional spooks are trained to spot and reject.

But Team Strzok kept pushing it through the system, causing a major escalation of a probe for which, by his own words, he knew had “no big there there.”

The answer as to why a pro such as Strzok would take such action has become clearer, at least to congressional investigators. That clarity comes from the context of the other emails and text messages that surrounded the May 19, 2017, declaration.

It turns out that what Strzok and Lisa Page were really doing that day was debating whether they should stay with the FBI and try to rise through the ranks to the level of an assistant director (AD) or join Mueller’s special counsel team.

“Who gives a f*ck, one more AD like [redacted] or whoever?” Strzok wrote, weighing the merits of promotion, before apparently suggesting what would be a more attractive role: “An investigation leading to impeachment?”

Lisa Page apparently realized the conversation had gone too far and tried to reel it in. “We should stop having this conversation here,” she texted back, adding later it was important to examine “the different realistic outcomes of this case.”

A few minutes later Strzok texted his own handicap of the Russia evidence: “You and I both know the odds are nothing. If I thought it was likely, I’d be there no question. I hesitate in part because of my gut sense and concern there’s no big there there.”

So the FBI agents who helped drive the Russia collusion narrative — as well as Rosenstein’s decision to appoint Mueller — apparently knew all along that the evidence was going to lead to “nothing” and, yet, they proceeded because they thought there was still a possibility of impeachment.

Impeachment is a political outcome. The only logical conclusion, then, that congressional investigators can make is that political bias led these agents to press an investigation forward to achieve the political outcome of impeachment, even though their professional training told them it had “no big there there.”

And that, by definition, is political bias in action.

How concerned you are by this conduct is almost certainly affected by your love or hatred for Trump. But put yourself for a second in the hot seat of an investigation by the same FBI cast of characters: You are under investigation for a crime the agents don’t think occurred, but the investigation still advances because the desired outcome is to get you fired from your job.

TEA PARTY TARGET

 Trump Poised To Take
 Control Of The Federal Reserve 

  • The Fed doesn’t stabilize markets and money — it does the opposite
  • President Trump sharply criticized the Federal Reserve this week, saying interest rate increases are hurting the economy.
  • Trump will have the opportunity to fashion the central bank in the image he would like as he has four vacancies to fill on the board of governors.
  • The result could be a more politicized Fed.

President Donald Trump has multiple reasons as to why he should take control of the Federal Reserve. He will do so both because he can and because his broader policies argue that he should do so. The president is anti-overregulating American industry. The Fed is a leader in pushing stringent regulation on the nation. By raising interest rates and stopping the growth in the money supply it stands in the way of further growth in the American economy.

First, He Can

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve is required to have seven members. It has three. Two of the current governors were put into their position by President Trump. Two more have been nominated by the president and are awaiting confirmation by the Senate. After these two are put on the Fed’s board, the president will then nominate two more to follow them. In essence, it is possible that six of the seven Board members will be put in place by Trump.

The Federal Open Market Committee has 12 members and sets the nation’s monetary policy. Seven of the 12 are the members of the Board of Governors. Five additional are Federal Reserve district bank presidents. Other than the head of the Fed bank in New York, who was nominated by the president, the other four can only take their positions as district bank presidents if the board in Washington agrees to their hiring. One of these, the Fed Bank president in Minneapolis, Neel Kashkari, is already arguing for no further rate increases.

Second, Regulation

Following the passage of the Dodd Frank Act in July 2010, the Fed was given enormous power to regulate the banking industry. It moved quickly to implement a number of new rules. The Fed set up a system that would penalize banks that failed to obey its new rules. These rules included setting limits as to how big an individual bank could be; how much money the banks had to invest in fed funds and Treasurys as a percent of their assets; which loans were desirable and which were not; where the banks had to obtain their funding and many, many, more up to and including how much a bank could pay its investors in dividends.

These rules have meaningfully slowed bank investments in the economy (the Volcker Rule) and they have had a crippling effect on bank lending in the housing markets (other agencies have had an impact here also).

Thus, of all of the government agencies the Fed has been possibly the most restrictive. The president has already moved to correct these excesses by putting in place a new Fed Governor (Randal Quarles) to regulate the banking industry.

Three, Killing Economic Growth

In the second quarter of 2018, the growth in non-seasonally adjusted money supply (M2) has been zero. That’s right, the money supply did not grow at all. This is because the Fed is shrinking its balance sheet ultimately by $50 billion per month. In addition, the Fed has raised interest rates seven times since Q4 2015. Supposedly there are five more rate increases coming.

This is the tightest monetary policy since Paul Volcker headed the institution in the mid-1980s. It will be recalled his policies led to back-to-back recessions. Current Fed monetary policy is directly in conflict with the president’s economic goals.

Moreover, the Treasury is estimating it will pay $415 billion in interest on the federal debt in this fiscal year. A better estimate might be $450 billion if rates keep going up. There are a lot of bridges and tunnels and jobs that could be created with this money.

Then there is inflation. It is likely to rise if the Fed eases its policies. If that happens paying down the federal debt becomes easier. On a less desirable note, higher interest rates lower real estate values. Lower rates that stimulate inflation increase real estate values.

Bottom Line

The president can and will take control of the Fed. It may be recalled when the law was written creating the Federal Reserve the secretary of the Treasury was designated as the head of the Federal Reserve. We are going to return to that era. Like it or not the Fed is about to be politicized.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service