Our Fathers' Legacy


Our Fathers' Legacy

A Legacy is a gift, truly our Fathers' legacy to us is in our Founding Documents. Come, learn with us as we explore in depth each of the documents that led to the Legacy left for us.

Location: Proudly USA
Members: 109
Latest Activity: Mar 27

Discussion Forum

Pledge of Allegiance

Started by girard senesac. Last reply by Bruce Everett Jan 22, 2015. 2 Replies

The new pledge :I pledge allegiance to King Obama of the new  U.S.of America and to the Socialists for which it stands, one United Nation, invisible, with no liberty or justice for all.Continue

Can we return to Reagan's "Shining City on the top o the Hll?"

Started by Joseph Volpendesta. Last reply by BarbaraFrame-Love Dec 25, 2013. 1 Reply

I would submit that the Founding Fathers were men completely unique in history   I would furthersubmit that hostility displayed by other nations is little more than envy at our place in history. …Continue

First Amendment 101

Started by Terri. Last reply by Georgia Ann Sellers Oct 5, 2013. 2 Replies

FIRST AMENDMENT 101Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the…Continue

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Our Fathers' Legacy to add comments!

Comment by Jea9 on November 15, 2012 at 5:22pm

I suggest going to publiushuldah.wordpress.com, link by Wordwaryor.

Print out the whole thing, and each of us mail it to our Governors and local sheriffs. She knows original intent. and it's time our jackas so-called leaders know it too. No one says it clearer, more accurately, than Publius. I am sending to Gov. Kasich of Ohio.

Comment by Dee on November 15, 2012 at 4:27am

Hi all,

I added a small update.  You can now discuss each of the founding documents on their own pages!  If you are on a particular page, please confine your conversations to the document at hand! Let's use the discussions and main page for more general areas.

Thanks for all you do!


Comment by jerry michael moses on November 14, 2012 at 10:50pm

       I sincerely hope this group is a roaring success. I don't think there is anything more important than our Constitution and Bill of Roghts. GOOD LUCK DEE !!!!!!


Comment by Babci Cathy on November 14, 2012 at 9:59pm

Wordwaryor...good choice.  Reading Publius Huldah is like taking a graduate course on the Constitution.  Have you seen her piece on :"What do we do with Obamacare--Nullify It!"  Brilliant...

Comment by Wordwaryor on November 14, 2012 at 9:02pm

Want to read exactly what the term "natural born citizen" REALLY means, where it came from ..... and why it was included in the Constitution as the primary qualification for President of the USA ?

Then go to the weblink....... and drill down for the lengthy discussion about "Natural Born Citizen and Vatel" on Publius Huldah's blog.

Then .... you will know what I have said is true.


Comment by Wordwaryor on November 14, 2012 at 8:55pm

We have let the Liberal press redefine "natural born citizen" to mean anyone born in the USA. In so doing they have REWRITTEN the Constitution's primary qualification for being eligible to be President. And NO ONE is stopping them. What a SHAME on all of us.

The evidence for a different definition is there, it is quite different, and it is powerful. It holds the key to REVERSING the result of this last election !! Yet no one takes up it cause, the cause and wisdom of our Founders written into the Constitution itself.

All that should happen is for Congress to do its duty, and finally examine the qualifications of Barack Obama against the Constitution's true definition of natural born citizen. HE would NOT pass.

NO .... I am not a birther. In FACT I would propose that Barack Obama's birth certificate from Hawaii be accepted as is .... AND USED AGAINST him as evidence that he DOES NOT meet the qualification to be President.

A natural born citizen is a person born in the USA to parents who are citizens of the USA. This was the written definition of NBC that our founders knew and wrote into the Constitution.

The Constitution makes a distinction between a "citizen" and a "Natural born citizen". A "Citizen" can be a Representative or a Senator, but ONLY a Natural Born Citizen can be President.

Our founders believed in "Natural Law" . A "natural born citizen" becomes a citizen "naturally" acquiring the citizenship of his/ her parents. A Natural born Citizen becomes a citizen without means of ANY written law of man.

Thus the 14th Amendment, and 8USC1401 a) through h) define only the combinations by which a person becomes a "citizen" of the USA by written Law....... and NONE of these can or do confer "Natural Born Citizenship" ( only citizenship).

THE TOTAL ANSWER to throwing Barack Obama out of office and reversing this sham of an election .... Lies right under out very noses in the Constitution.

The Constitution requires Congress to verify a president elects qualification BEFORE certifying the electors in December. And it provides for what happens IF an elected president is found to be NOT qualified.

IN this case, the VP acts as President until the House of Reps selects an interim President. The interim President serves as President UNTIL a new Presidential election can be held.

IF ONLY ........ WE the PEOPLE DEMAND that CONGRESS DO ITS JOB !! BEFORE CERTIFYING THE electors from this election.

Barack Obama's Hawaiian BC clearly SHOWS that his FATHER was NOT a U.S. citizen ...... and therefore it is EVIDENCE that he is clearly NOT a Natural Born Citizen. !!

The Birthers have been pursuing the WRONG path all along. And have only Muddied the water.

THE ANSWER to our prayers, and our current predicament LIES RIGHT THERE in the Constitution !

And NO ONE is even talking about it, considering it , or pursuing it.

I am disheartened.

Comment by Larry D. Baker on November 14, 2012 at 8:33pm

Obama and his "TRAITOR BUDDIES" Have opened up a big can of worms, and as the Japanese in World War II found out; they've awakened a sleeping giant.  We may not be the "GREATEST GENERATION", but we're very close to it; and our people are cut, from the same mold.   When our country is in trouble, and needs our help; we can still do it.   There are still a lot of the "grey brigade" out here, and we've all got one more good fight; left in us.   "GOD BLESS AMERICA"!!

Comment by tbPatriot on November 14, 2012 at 8:18pm

The founding fathers of the nation created a solid republic based on government by the people.  Recently we have witnessed the demise of our republic structure through dictatorial policy that circumvnets the intent of the Constitution.  We must return to the principles installed by the Constitution for the nation.  This means we must educate many who believe that the dictatorial style of government is permitted under our constitutional republic.

Comment by Tom Gerhardt on November 14, 2012 at 7:05pm

Thank you for the invitation Dee

Comment by Terri on November 14, 2012 at 6:25pm

I agree, I recently started taking the Hillsdale College, I'm doing the introductory courses now.  They are great!




Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.


Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service