Our Fathers' Legacy

Information

Our Fathers' Legacy

A Legacy is a gift, truly our Fathers' legacy to us is in our Founding Documents. Come, learn with us as we explore in depth each of the documents that led to the Legacy left for us.

Location: Proudly USA
Members: 109
Latest Activity: Mar 27

Discussion Forum

Pledge of Allegiance

Started by girard senesac. Last reply by Bruce Everett Jan 22, 2015. 2 Replies

The new pledge :I pledge allegiance to King Obama of the new  U.S.of America and to the Socialists for which it stands, one United Nation, invisible, with no liberty or justice for all.Continue

Can we return to Reagan's "Shining City on the top o the Hll?"

Started by Joseph Volpendesta. Last reply by BarbaraFrame-Love Dec 25, 2013. 1 Reply

I would submit that the Founding Fathers were men completely unique in history   I would furthersubmit that hostility displayed by other nations is little more than envy at our place in history. …Continue

First Amendment 101

Started by Terri. Last reply by Georgia Ann Sellers Oct 5, 2013. 2 Replies

FIRST AMENDMENT 101Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the…Continue

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Our Fathers' Legacy to add comments!

Comment by Joseph Wonderless on April 2, 2017 at 5:53pm

Raphael  A Brown

Has anyone actually done his or her homework? Obama’s father was born a British subject, and the British Subject act of 1948 states that anyone born of a British Subject is themselves a British Subject! His mother being an American citizen gives him dual citizenship, which makes him ineligible to hold office period. What more does anyone need to

I believe most of us know this, and only the democrats could get away with it.  But what can we do my friend? Unless the people unite and demand justice , nothing will be done.

Comment by RIP on February 22, 2015 at 3:57pm

We need leaders! Patriotic Leaders with Courage to Stand up. Leaders who use words as our Founding Fathers did as well. Leaders who will not fear those that will kill them. Leaders who will not only speak online or the web, but speak out in cities and States. That is the problem. What kind of Leaders will be our Heroes and lead us? Lead us to take our country back and see the enemy just who they are? Leaders who are not Bought out or are pawns. I know they are out there, although it is a matter of time whether or not they choose to come out and speak out with Courage and Bravery and call the enemy just who the enemy is. Where are those Patriotic Leaders?

Comment by Jack Lamberson on April 15, 2014 at 8:13am

I agree that we have less that a 50-50 chance of haveing another presidential exlection.  I f we do not step up and at least try to take our country back we will become muslim subjects and be put to death if we do not become one if them,   Please people pay attention to what is happening in our contry and stand up and be heard and make damn sure all your friends understand as well.

Comment by Rex Gaylord Davis on April 2, 2014 at 6:01am

     I would like to thank you for allowing me into this group and hope that I am able to contribute to your satisfaction. I believe that our nation needs a rebirth of the revolutionary spirit which brought it into being. We need to return to the original foundations which were established in 1776 . We cannot keep our heads buried in propaganda, saying nothing while expecting change. America make a stand.

Comment by Georgia Ann Sellers on October 5, 2013 at 5:57am

why can't we form a March on Washington protesting the actions of obama and the senate's closing down of the government for political purposes? we see the demonstrations going on egypt, & like we saw when hussien was outsted from his government office. these people stood up for their principles and won! we shout that we do not like what is going on in Washington, but that is all we do! We have representatives in congress voted into office by the people to do the bidding of the people; however, once in office, these clowns think that they have Carte Blanche to do whatever they want, to pass bills or laws that clearly go against the Constitution! we should march on Washington and demand that washington listen and Do what the People Demand, otherwise face recall or impeachment, whichever fits the bill to get them out of office!

Comment by Raphael A Brown on March 7, 2013 at 7:26pm

I did some homework this what I came up with.

It Matters Not Where Obama Was Born!

Has anyone actually done his or her homework? Obama’s father was born a British subject, and the British Subject act of 1948 states that anyone born of a British Subject is themselves a British Subject! His mother being an American citizen gives him dual citizenship, which makes him ineligible to hold office period. What more does anyone need to know? Of course, we can say he gave up citizenship when he attended a Madrasa for at least five years hence he is an Indonesian citizen. He does not get the privilege of Impeachment he should be arrested and removed from the people’s house ASAP!
This makes Obama-care illegal and should stop the monies going to the Muslim Brotherhood. (Supreme Court not needed.

Comment by Ron Foreman on December 29, 2012 at 6:45pm

Roger, no govt. has been changed without spilling blood, for the good or the bad.

Comment by Terri on December 29, 2012 at 12:11pm

Will the propoganda never end?

http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/us-v-usa.htm

Comment by Roger Davies on December 29, 2012 at 11:13am

Ron:

You are making a HUGE assumption here. You are assuming that the GOVERNMENT is operating under our Constitution. It is NOT! It looks like it. And the so called elected senators and congressmen put on a good show pretending to be following it. Ever wonder why you are continually saying, “That didn’t sound right.”? IT AIN’T RIGHT! Because, they AIN’T following the Constitution!

They haven’t been following the Constitution for many decades.

What’s the answer? When enough people get fed up enough, WE THE PEOPLE will take back our Country. PEACEFULLY!  http://www.nebraskarepublic.org/ Pick on “WATCH VIDEO”. WE need you more than ever. Let me know what you think; rd6475@hotmail.com

Comment by Ron Foreman on December 29, 2012 at 10:09am

We seem to discuss all matters pertaining to Government. Our forefathers were genius at understanding human nature. They were also the elite of that time period. How do we use what they have taught us to change the complete derogation of the system? The tea party, in order to be a power force, must have a leadership that can unite all states. The constitution being the base. It is been amended so many times that is seems to not exist. We have over a 100,000 laws which in itself useless. Most designed to create an enlarged government work force. But, how do we win, how do we exert power on the legislative branch? Do we follow the Art of War or Bill Ayers plan? How do we vet candidates that will stand strong and not fall under the magic and romance of power and wealth? Will each of us pledge our life and wealth for the sake of Liberty? Or will we talk it to death? When Tea Party started in our area  we had demonstrations and gatherings every couple of weeks. Had the convention in Nashville which was full. Why is it that the Democrats can organize and protest and we can not, at least not continually? They pay people to work every precinct  and they never shut down, while we go home and lick out wounds. Just some thoughts. Yes we can return, but we must organize and never, never, never quit.

 
 
 

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service