Net Commandos: Obama Executive Orders

Information

Net Commandos: Obama Executive Orders

This group will be for researching and listing Obama's Executive Orders

Members: 37
Latest Activity: Dec 27, 2013

Executive Orders - Bypassing Congress

An executive order is an order or directive issued by the head of the executive branch at some level of government. The term executive order is most commonly applied to orders issued by the President.

US presidents have issued executive orders since 1789. Although there is no Constitutional provision or statute that explicitly permits executive orders, there is a vague grant of "executive power" given in Article II, Section 1, Clause 1 of the Constitution, and furthered by the declaration "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed" made in Article II, Section 3, Clause 4. Most Executive Orders use these Constitutional reasonings as the authorization allowing for their issuance to be justified as part of the President's sworn duties,[2] the intent being to help direct officers of the US Executive carry out their delegated duties as well as the normal operations of the federal government: the consequence of failing to comply possibly being the removal from office.[3]

 

 

Critics have accused presidents of abusing executive orders, of using them to make laws without Congressional approval, and of moving existing laws away from their original mandates.[6] Large policy changes with wide-ranging effects have been effected through executive order, including the integration of the armed forces under Harry Truman and the desegregation of public schools under Dwight D. Eisenhower.

One extreme example of an executive order is Executive Order 9066, where Franklin D. Roosevelt delegated military authority to remove any or all people (used to target specifically Japanese Americans and German Americans) in a military zone. The authority delegated to General John L. DeWitt subsequently paved the way for all Japanese-Americans on the West Coast to be sent to internment camps for the duration of World War II.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_order_%28United_States%29

 

 

 

The following is a Disposition Table with Executive Orders from ALL Presidents. Barack Obama is the very first listing.

 

http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/disposition.html

Discussion Forum

Obama's qualifications

Started by Matt Burns. Last reply by 18162v1ex3gck Oct 30, 2012. 1 Reply

I am amazed that we have allowed someone with such a background to become elected as president. Wrong SS numbers, no legal birth certificate, schooling paid for with foreign student funds,…Continue

President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order

Started by Melony B. DeFord. Last reply by Adolfo O. Perez Sep 4, 2012. 13 Replies

Posted on September 3, 2012 at 1:05pm by Becket Adams…Continue

Tags: Change, Climate, Department, of, Agriculture

Obama says:

Started by Raymond Jorgensen Sep 4, 2012. 0 Replies

Obama says:Back in 07 and 08 Obama talked about Hope and Change, but he did not explain what Hope and Change was. He talked about his administration becoming the most transparent, no lobbyists and…Continue

Tags: Obama

Current List of President Obama's Executive Orders

Started by Grace Polaris. Last reply by 2zcmmdp33h4ta Aug 16, 2012. 4 Replies

Has obama violated his Executive Order privilege? If yes, how can we stop him before election time?Current List of President Obama's Executive Orders…Continue

Tags: Orders, Executive

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Net Commandos: Obama Executive Orders to add comments!

Comment by Raymond Jorgensen on September 4, 2012 at 9:21am

Congress can only over-ride an EO by a super majority vote (60%) of each house due to the Presidents veto power. 

Comment by Andrew on September 4, 2012 at 7:24am

Our Congress must act to recind these UNCONSITUTIONAL EXECUTIVE ORDERS !

the president is NOT a dictator. 

Comment by James Higginbotham on August 16, 2012 at 9:31pm

Howdy Ralph.

well he is GOING BY ANY MEANS POSSIBLE.

Semper Fi.

Jim.

Comment by Ralph E WallSr on August 16, 2012 at 9:16pm

Have to agree with you James he doesn't know how to operate any other way. I think the first time Congress went against him he decided then that he would have to operate by EO. When we get rid of him whether it be Romney or some one else hope they turn his baloney around.

Comment by James Higginbotham on August 16, 2012 at 5:11pm

Howdy.

all those EO'S are AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS HELL.

that's hoe the executive branch as USURPED THE CONSTITUTION.

Semper Fi.

Jim.

 

Members (34)

 
 
 

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

judicialwatch.org
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service