Information

Net Warriors

The battleground is the internet. You are the warriors. The mission is conservative dominance on FaceBook and Twitter.

Members: 65
Latest Activity: Mar 19, 2015

Are you on FaceBook? Do you Twitter? WE NEED YOU!

The battleground is the internet. You are the warriors. The mission is conservative dominance on FaceBook and Twitter.

In 2008 the Democrats ruled the web and took the White House.  2014 is the year of the Conservatives.  We've learned a lot since that fateful 2008 election and now it is our time to harness the full force of the internet to get the Conservative message out and understood.

 

We need people on FaceBook sharing our messages.  If you are on Twitter, we need you twittering the message!  Let's make sure we are heard LOUD AND CLEAR! 

 

If you can help, please sign up and start sharing the discussions we have on site, the blogs, your comments, just keep Conservatism in front of the masses. If you are feeling really inspired, hit up a few liberal sites and have some fun!!

 

Are you willing to step out on the web and show the left that we can network too?  Then, let's get to it! 

 

 

Discussion Forum

Homeland Security Takeover - We are now a Communist country!

Started by Mary. Last reply by AL Knabenbauer Jul 19, 2013. 1 Reply

Once again, President Obama has signed an unconstitutionally-expanded Executive Order giving himself kingship (See the Order: …Continue

The Revolution has begun! Divided we fall!

Started by Mary Nov 12, 2012. 0 Replies

Many states have petitioned to leave the union under Obama.  The revolution has been provoked.  But, divided we fall.  Without the U.S. military to defend them, how many states will come under fire…Continue

Richard D Gregory Sr

Started by RICHARD D GREGORY Sr. Last reply by RICHARD D GREGORY Sr Aug 12, 2012. 7 Replies

I am a very opinoinated man.I will start with something I posted on "JOINTHETEAPARTY.NET"This will bother many Christians; but I cannot help that.                        I believe that America was…Continue

# (hashtags) and @'s for Twitter - groups to twitter to

Started by Melony B. DeFord. Last reply by Debra Rae steinman May 19, 2012. 1 Reply

Here is a list of hashtag groups to Twitter to, about anything...Post your subject/title then your # (hashtag)#tcot     <---TopConservativesOnTwitter#teaparty#wethepeople#conservative#hcr     …Continue

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Net Warriors to add comments!

Comment by Gary Wayne Justice on January 8, 2015 at 12:41pm

Debra,

The greatest invention by mankind is the internet, never before has humans have an efficient way to communicate throughout the whole planet, When I joined your group a couple of years ago , I was in high hope that Tea Party members would come to this group to express their ideas, convictions, & morals here at this platform. As a members only group with no outside interference, to sway our discussions.   Never before, have we as citizens been reduced to 2nd , or even 3rd class status. 2012,, 2013, & 2014 have seen our most basic liberties been shredded by local, county, state, & Federal governments!!!!! I will tell you if this mess had happened 30 years ago, there would have definitely been a serious rebellion. I am not talking, social, lifestyle, or talking rebellion, I mean armed insurrection , but I guess, the literal dumbing-down  of America  has succeeded!  I will try to keep posting here as long as I am physically able to. If no one listens, I will, as written in the Bible,,"Preach To The Trees., Birds,Animals, & Air"      Gary

Comment by Gary Wayne Justice on January 7, 2015 at 12:40pm

Debra,

Sorry been a while since I posted on this group, do not really like posting, or expressing my ideas on twitter, or Facebook, you have a lot of useful idiots , that are not Tea Party members, and have no useful knowledge on how the role of city, county, state, & national gov't works!!!!!!!!!!!!   Hope in the future tea party members come back to this forum to discuss current issues!!!

Gary 

Comment by Debra Rae steinman on January 7, 2015 at 11:32am

Gary, I always wait for the alerts.  But I've been active in twitter, facebook etc......

Comment by Gary Wayne Justice on January 7, 2015 at 11:04am

Does anyone ever post here any more???????

I cannot Imagine that with the problems with our state gov. here in Ga., that this group is so silent????

Gary

Comment by InfoWarsTV1 on February 26, 2014 at 12:51pm

Some new lady left this at my site. Obviously she has acquired a taste for the Kool-Aid and believes strongly in parroting everything she's told by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Anyone want help intervene? Be nice; she's looking for a fight - she's in desperate need of logic.

https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/113504931417760953233/strea...


ADMIN
Comment by Dee on February 10, 2014 at 7:23am
18 days after conception a baby has a heartbeat. Day 42, the baby has brain activity. By the 11th week the child is breathing.  Democrats say it is okay for the mother to kill this child.  Is abortion really premeditated murder?
 
Answer:
Yes, abortion is premeditated murder
No, it is a fetus not a baby 
I don't know  
Picture:

ADMIN
Comment by Dee on January 29, 2014 at 7:52am
Vote and Share! Obama intends to use his pen to 'dictate' to the American people for the rest of his term. You vote and we will get the results to the news people and Congress!

http://teapartyinfo.org/polling/10023_Is_Obama_an_Imperial_Presiden...

ADMIN
Comment by Dee on January 19, 2014 at 8:54am


ADMIN
Comment by Dee on January 19, 2014 at 8:54am


ADMIN
Comment by Dee on January 19, 2014 at 8:54am

 

Members (63)

 
 
 

LIGHTER SIDE

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Lisa Benson

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

ALERT ALERT

FBI Text Should Alarm Every American

Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, the reported FBI lovebirds, are the poster children for the next “Don’t Text and Investigate” public service ads airing soon at an FBI office near you.

Their extraordinary texting affair on their government phones has given the FBI a black eye, laying bare a raw political bias brought into the workplace that agents are supposed to check at the door when they strap on their guns and badges.

It is no longer in dispute that they held animus for Donald Trump, who was a subject of their Russia probe, or that they openly discussed using the powers of their office to “stop” Trumpfrom becoming president. The only question is whether any official acts they took in the Russia collusion probe were driven by those sentiments.

The Justice Department’s inspector general is endeavoring to answer that question.

For any American who wants an answer sooner, there are just five words, among the thousands of suggestive texts Page and Strzok exchanged, that you should read.

That passage was transmitted on May 19, 2017. “There’s no big there there,” Strzok texted.

The date of the text long has intrigued investigators: It is two days after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein named special counsel Robert Mueller to oversee an investigation into alleged collusion between Trump and the Russia campaign.

Since the text was turned over to Congress, investigators wondered whether it referred to the evidence against the Trump campaign.

This month, they finally got the chance to ask. Strzok declined to say — but Page, during a closed-door interview with lawmakers, confirmed in the most pained and contorted way that the message in fact referred to the quality of the Russia case, according to multiple eyewitnesses.

The admission is deeply consequential. It means Rosenstein unleashed the most awesome powers of a special counsel to investigate an allegation that the key FBI officials, driving the investigation for 10 months beforehand, did not think was “there.”

By the time of the text and Mueller’s appointment, the FBI’s best counterintelligence agents had had plenty of time to dig. They knowingly used a dossier funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign — which contained uncorroborated allegations — to persuade the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court to issue a warrant to monitor Trump campaign adviser Carter Page (no relation to Lisa Page).

They sat on Carter Page’s phones and emails for nearly six months without getting evidence that would warrant prosecuting him. The evidence they had gathered was deemed so weak that their boss, then-FBI Director James Comey, was forced to admit to Congress after being fired by Trump that the core allegation remained substantially uncorroborated.

In other words, they had a big nothing burger. And, based on that empty-calorie dish, Rosenstein authorized the buffet menu of a special prosecutor that has cost America millions of dollars and months of political strife.

The work product Strzok created to justify the collusion probe now has been shown to be inferior: A Clinton-hired contractor produced multiple documents accusing Trump of wrongdoing during the election; each was routed to the FBI through a different source or was used to seed news articles with similar allegations that further built an uncorroborated public narrative of Trump-Russia collusion. Most troubling, the FBI relied on at least one of those news stories to justify the FISA warrant against Carter Page.

That sort of multifaceted allegation machine, which can be traced back to a single source, is known in spy craft as “circular intelligence reporting,” and it’s the sort of bad product that professional spooks are trained to spot and reject.

But Team Strzok kept pushing it through the system, causing a major escalation of a probe for which, by his own words, he knew had “no big there there.”

The answer as to why a pro such as Strzok would take such action has become clearer, at least to congressional investigators. That clarity comes from the context of the other emails and text messages that surrounded the May 19, 2017, declaration.

It turns out that what Strzok and Lisa Page were really doing that day was debating whether they should stay with the FBI and try to rise through the ranks to the level of an assistant director (AD) or join Mueller’s special counsel team.

“Who gives a f*ck, one more AD like [redacted] or whoever?” Strzok wrote, weighing the merits of promotion, before apparently suggesting what would be a more attractive role: “An investigation leading to impeachment?”

Lisa Page apparently realized the conversation had gone too far and tried to reel it in. “We should stop having this conversation here,” she texted back, adding later it was important to examine “the different realistic outcomes of this case.”

A few minutes later Strzok texted his own handicap of the Russia evidence: “You and I both know the odds are nothing. If I thought it was likely, I’d be there no question. I hesitate in part because of my gut sense and concern there’s no big there there.”

So the FBI agents who helped drive the Russia collusion narrative — as well as Rosenstein’s decision to appoint Mueller — apparently knew all along that the evidence was going to lead to “nothing” and, yet, they proceeded because they thought there was still a possibility of impeachment.

Impeachment is a political outcome. The only logical conclusion, then, that congressional investigators can make is that political bias led these agents to press an investigation forward to achieve the political outcome of impeachment, even though their professional training told them it had “no big there there.”

And that, by definition, is political bias in action.

How concerned you are by this conduct is almost certainly affected by your love or hatred for Trump. But put yourself for a second in the hot seat of an investigation by the same FBI cast of characters: You are under investigation for a crime the agents don’t think occurred, but the investigation still advances because the desired outcome is to get you fired from your job.

TEA PARTY TARGET

 Trump Poised To Take
 Control Of The Federal Reserve 

  • The Fed doesn’t stabilize markets and money — it does the opposite
  • President Trump sharply criticized the Federal Reserve this week, saying interest rate increases are hurting the economy.
  • Trump will have the opportunity to fashion the central bank in the image he would like as he has four vacancies to fill on the board of governors.
  • The result could be a more politicized Fed.

President Donald Trump has multiple reasons as to why he should take control of the Federal Reserve. He will do so both because he can and because his broader policies argue that he should do so. The president is anti-overregulating American industry. The Fed is a leader in pushing stringent regulation on the nation. By raising interest rates and stopping the growth in the money supply it stands in the way of further growth in the American economy.

First, He Can

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve is required to have seven members. It has three. Two of the current governors were put into their position by President Trump. Two more have been nominated by the president and are awaiting confirmation by the Senate. After these two are put on the Fed’s board, the president will then nominate two more to follow them. In essence, it is possible that six of the seven Board members will be put in place by Trump.

The Federal Open Market Committee has 12 members and sets the nation’s monetary policy. Seven of the 12 are the members of the Board of Governors. Five additional are Federal Reserve district bank presidents. Other than the head of the Fed bank in New York, who was nominated by the president, the other four can only take their positions as district bank presidents if the board in Washington agrees to their hiring. One of these, the Fed Bank president in Minneapolis, Neel Kashkari, is already arguing for no further rate increases.

Second, Regulation

Following the passage of the Dodd Frank Act in July 2010, the Fed was given enormous power to regulate the banking industry. It moved quickly to implement a number of new rules. The Fed set up a system that would penalize banks that failed to obey its new rules. These rules included setting limits as to how big an individual bank could be; how much money the banks had to invest in fed funds and Treasurys as a percent of their assets; which loans were desirable and which were not; where the banks had to obtain their funding and many, many, more up to and including how much a bank could pay its investors in dividends.

These rules have meaningfully slowed bank investments in the economy (the Volcker Rule) and they have had a crippling effect on bank lending in the housing markets (other agencies have had an impact here also).

Thus, of all of the government agencies the Fed has been possibly the most restrictive. The president has already moved to correct these excesses by putting in place a new Fed Governor (Randal Quarles) to regulate the banking industry.

Three, Killing Economic Growth

In the second quarter of 2018, the growth in non-seasonally adjusted money supply (M2) has been zero. That’s right, the money supply did not grow at all. This is because the Fed is shrinking its balance sheet ultimately by $50 billion per month. In addition, the Fed has raised interest rates seven times since Q4 2015. Supposedly there are five more rate increases coming.

This is the tightest monetary policy since Paul Volcker headed the institution in the mid-1980s. It will be recalled his policies led to back-to-back recessions. Current Fed monetary policy is directly in conflict with the president’s economic goals.

Moreover, the Treasury is estimating it will pay $415 billion in interest on the federal debt in this fiscal year. A better estimate might be $450 billion if rates keep going up. There are a lot of bridges and tunnels and jobs that could be created with this money.

Then there is inflation. It is likely to rise if the Fed eases its policies. If that happens paying down the federal debt becomes easier. On a less desirable note, higher interest rates lower real estate values. Lower rates that stimulate inflation increase real estate values.

Bottom Line

The president can and will take control of the Fed. It may be recalled when the law was written creating the Federal Reserve the secretary of the Treasury was designated as the head of the Federal Reserve. We are going to return to that era. Like it or not the Fed is about to be politicized.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service