Give us your pointers! It might help someone else here avoid a ban on the leftist websites!

Views: 80

Replies to This Discussion

The best thing we can do is not to call names or be insulting. Libtards want to get you upset by calling you names. We must not put ourselves at their level. Be strong and to the point. It pisses them off even more when you ignore the childish name calling and don't put yourself at their level.

These are some of the things I try to keep in mind when responding to Blogs. I don’t always succeed, and sometimes I fail spectacularly.

Please feel free to add your experiences. I’m not an expert by any means and am always open to reasoned arguments to better my education.

1.) Write your responses in MS Word or some other word editor first. This allows you to think out the response, and to spell check.

2.) Be concise and give reasoned accurate information with links to your source material.

3.) When making your argument, it’s best to find websites or material that can be seen as impartial.

4.) Try to keep in mind, for every conservative website you reference, the leftist ideologue has one they can reference.

5.) Use the hateful rhetoric from their websites against them.

6.) Do not respond when you are emotional.

7.) Mix it up, responding with kindness throws them off, and when sarcasm is used at the proper times it can be a most rewarding experience.

8.) When evidence is contrary to their view, they will immediately resort to name calling and try to obfuscate the conversation.

9.) Conservatives typically use facts, while Leftist use emotions as the source for arguments.

10.) If you remain calm, this will cause the most rabid leftist to have a conniption and degenerate into the most vile, hateful, person to ever cross your path. This is good, as you don’t need to take the conversation further, and their insanity is clear for all to see.

11.) The other extreme is the pure ideologue that can give reasoned arguments for their beliefs. These are the most dangerous, and you need to be educated on the subject you’re discussing, or you will be humiliated and lose the debate. You need to be on your toes with this type as they will be practiced in double speak and obfuscation. Think, sometimes deflection is better than direct confrontation, and know when you’ve been beat.

Always remember:
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt."
"Who’s more the fool… The fool, or the fool who follows the fool."
"Let the fool speak, so as to reveal himself for all to see."

My advice is to argue in "moral terms" when confronting these libertards...example: their point on using the government to force businesses to like bakery's to make cakes for gay weddings even if goes against the bakery owners religious beliefs. They would argue on moral terms, screaming discrimination. We would rebuttal saying something like "why is it ok to use the government to force someone to do something they don't want to do.."

 you see, they don't understand or want to understand facts, they DO understand is speaking morality. So basically, when they get on their moral high-horse, you get on yours and knock'em down. Word your arguments around the language of morality and you will throw them for a tail spin and they'll just start calling you names....that's when you know you've won

How about if we get together and attack the liberal media?  We don't have to call them names( every time we do they have to stop and look up that word in the dictionary, there intelligence is Shockley limited.)  I think we should tell them when they lie about a story.

Lets never,never attack each other regardless of what is going on.Dee can we make this so what we talk about the libs can't use it against us on the media 

I started by going on to the sites of my liberals who are in public office, and attended President Trumps protest while being paid by us. And told them off .

lol...what sites so I can get me some too hehehehe

I look for a site where they are talking about a Republican like Trump and start reading the stupid comments.





Rush Limbaugh Explains How Robert Mueller
Will Attempt To Financially Destroy President Trump

 Special Counsel Robert Mueller has crossed President Trump’s “red line” after issuing a subpoena for documents related to the Trump Organization’s business dealings with Russia.

New York Times reports:

The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, has subpoenaed the Trump Organization to turn over documents, including some related to Russia, according to two people briefed on the matter. The order is the first known time that the special counsel demanded documents directly related to President Trump’s businesses, bringing the investigation closer to the president. […] The Trump Organization has said that it never had real estate holdings in Russia, but witnesses recently interviewed by Mr. Mueller have been asked about a possible real estate deal in Moscow. In 2015, a longtime business associate of Mr. Trump’s emailed Mr. Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen at his Trump Organization account claiming he had ties to President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and said that building a Trump Tower in Moscow would help Mr. Trump’s presidential campaign.

Radio host Rush Limbaugh theorized on his program Friday that one of Mueller’s true objectives is to financially destroy President Trump.

Partial transcript via Breitbart News:

And these requests, the subpoena for documents from the Trump Organization, I ask you again, what has that to do with the campaign and with collusion and with the Russians? They’ve already been looking into Trump business in Russia with the Miss, what is it, USA, whatever his pageant is.

Do you all remember during the early days of the campaign there was news that Trump, in a tax return something like 20 years ago, took a $900 million deduction that was granted and survived an audit by the IRS? Now, I forget the details. It had to do with losses that he had incurred in that year in building things. It was around 900 or $920 million deduction. I’ll never forget when it was reported because most people will never come close to ever having that in a lifetime, and to have a guy personally write that much off?

Anyway, I think Mueller wants that $920 million back. I think Mueller wants to prove that that was a faulty deduction. I think that they want to go back, they want to get Trump’s tax returns because they want to nullify that $900 million deduction, and then they want to collect 20 years of interest and penalties and wipe Trump out.

In the meantime, President Trump’s lawyers are in the process of negotiating with special counsel Robert Mueller to bring the Russia probe to an end, reports Rebecca Ballhaus and Peter Nicholas of the Wall Street Journal.

Mueller’s tentacles continue to reach further and further.

CNN reported that investigators are attempting to determine whether former Blackwater chief Erik Prince misled the  House Intelligence Committee about a meeting he had in Seychelles in January of 2017.

Prince is accused of using the meeting as an opportunity to establish a secret back channel with Russia.

Fox News’ Catherine Herridge spoke with one of President Trump’s personal lawyers about the new subpoena request by Special Counsel Mueller.

According to Herridge, Trump’s lawyer was unaware of the subpoena and said it may be a ‘wrap up’ subpoena or ‘clean up’ subpoena which may signal the end of the investigation.


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service