Give us your pointers! It might help someone else here avoid a ban on the leftist websites!

Views: 95

Replies to This Discussion

The best thing we can do is not to call names or be insulting. Libtards want to get you upset by calling you names. We must not put ourselves at their level. Be strong and to the point. It pisses them off even more when you ignore the childish name calling and don't put yourself at their level.

These are some of the things I try to keep in mind when responding to Blogs. I don’t always succeed, and sometimes I fail spectacularly.

Please feel free to add your experiences. I’m not an expert by any means and am always open to reasoned arguments to better my education.

1.) Write your responses in MS Word or some other word editor first. This allows you to think out the response, and to spell check.

2.) Be concise and give reasoned accurate information with links to your source material.

3.) When making your argument, it’s best to find websites or material that can be seen as impartial.

4.) Try to keep in mind, for every conservative website you reference, the leftist ideologue has one they can reference.

5.) Use the hateful rhetoric from their websites against them.

6.) Do not respond when you are emotional.

7.) Mix it up, responding with kindness throws them off, and when sarcasm is used at the proper times it can be a most rewarding experience.

8.) When evidence is contrary to their view, they will immediately resort to name calling and try to obfuscate the conversation.

9.) Conservatives typically use facts, while Leftist use emotions as the source for arguments.

10.) If you remain calm, this will cause the most rabid leftist to have a conniption and degenerate into the most vile, hateful, person to ever cross your path. This is good, as you don’t need to take the conversation further, and their insanity is clear for all to see.

11.) The other extreme is the pure ideologue that can give reasoned arguments for their beliefs. These are the most dangerous, and you need to be educated on the subject you’re discussing, or you will be humiliated and lose the debate. You need to be on your toes with this type as they will be practiced in double speak and obfuscation. Think, sometimes deflection is better than direct confrontation, and know when you’ve been beat.

Always remember:
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt."
"Who’s more the fool… The fool, or the fool who follows the fool."
"Let the fool speak, so as to reveal himself for all to see."

My advice is to argue in "moral terms" when confronting these libertards...example: their point on using the government to force businesses to like bakery's to make cakes for gay weddings even if goes against the bakery owners religious beliefs. They would argue on moral terms, screaming discrimination. We would rebuttal saying something like "why is it ok to use the government to force someone to do something they don't want to do.."

 you see, they don't understand or want to understand facts, they DO understand is speaking morality. So basically, when they get on their moral high-horse, you get on yours and knock'em down. Word your arguments around the language of morality and you will throw them for a tail spin and they'll just start calling you names....that's when you know you've won

How about if we get together and attack the liberal media?  We don't have to call them names( every time we do they have to stop and look up that word in the dictionary, there intelligence is Shockley limited.)  I think we should tell them when they lie about a story.

Lets never,never attack each other regardless of what is going on.Dee can we make this so what we talk about the libs can't use it against us on the media 

I started by going on to the sites of my liberals who are in public office, and attended President Trumps protest while being paid by us. And told them off .

lol...what sites so I can get me some too hehehehe

I look for a site where they are talking about a Republican like Trump and start reading the stupid comments.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

ALERT ALERT

 Will  Tea Party Hand The Liberals Their Ass On Election Day? 

It was this week two years ago that Hillary Clinton’s victory looked assured, when the infamous “Access Hollywood” tape of Donald Trump bragging about sexual assault appeared all but certain to end his campaign.

Jesse Ferguson remembers it well. The deputy press secretary for Clinton’s campaign also remembers what happened a month later.

It’s why this veteran Democratic operative can’t shake the feeling that, as promising as the next election looks for his party, it might still all turn out wrong.

“Election Day will either prove to me I have PTSD or show I’ve been living déjà vu,” Ferguson said. “I just don’t know which yet.”

Ferguson is one of many Democrats who felt the string of unexpected defeat in 2016 and are now closely — and nervously — watching the current election near its end, wondering if history will repeat itself. This year, instead of trying to win the presidency, Democrats have placed an onus on trying to gain 23 House seats and win a majority.

The anxiety isn’t universal, with many party leaders professing confidently and repeatedly that this year really is different.

But even some of them acknowledge the similarities between the current and previous election: Trump is unpopular and beset by scandal, Democrats hold leads in the polls, and some Republicans are openly pessimistic.

FiveThirtyEight gives Democrats a 76.9 percent chance of winning the House one month before Election Day. Their odds for Clinton’s victory two years ago? 71.4 percent.

The abundance of optimism brings back queasy memories for Jesse Lehrich, who worked on the Clinton campaign and remembers watching the returns come in from the Javits Center in New York.

“I was getting texts after the result was clear – including even from some political reporters and operatives – texting me, you know, ‘Are you guys starting to get nervous?’ or ‘What’s her most likely path?’” he said. “I was like, ‘What do you mean, starting to get nervous? What path? They just called Wisconsin. We lost.’”

“People were so slow to process that reality because they just hadn’t considered the possibility that Donald Trump was going to be the next president,” he continued.

Lehrich said he sees similarities between 2016 and 2018. But he said he thought Democrats were cognizant of the parallels and determined not to let up a month before the election, as many voters might have two years ago.

Other Democratic leaders aren’t so sure. Asked if he thought his party was overconfident, Democratic Rep. Seth Moulton responded flatly, “Yes.”

Democrats could win a lot of House seats, he said, or could still fall short of capturing a majority.

“The point is that we’ve got to realize that this not just some unstoppable blue wave but rather a lot of tough races that will be hard-fought victories,” Moulton said.

If Democrats are universally nervous about anything after 2016, it’s polling. The polls weren’t actually as favorable to Clinton and the Democrats as some remember, something 538’s Nate Silver and some other journalists pointed out at the time.

But Clinton’s decision not to campaign in a state she’d lose, Wisconsin, and the failure of pollsters everywhere to miss a wave of Trump supporters in red areas are mistakes Democrats are still grappling with today.

“Clearly last cycle, polling was off,” Ben Ray Lujan, chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, told reporters last month. “There were a lot of predictions that were made last cycle that didn’t come to fruition.”

Lujan emphasized in particular how pollsters missed the rural vote, calling it a “devastating mistake.” He said the DCCC has taken deliberate steps since 2016 to get it right this time around, but underscored a congressional majority still required a tooth-and-nail fight.

“So I’m confident with the team that’s been assembled, but I’m definitely cognizant of the fact we need to understand these models and understand the data for what it is,” he said.

One Democratic pollster said the data he’s seen makes plain that the party is favored to win a majority — but that it’s still not a sure thing. He said even now it’s unclear if the political environment will create an electoral tsunami, or merely a good year where Democrats might still fall short of a House majority.

“We’ve all learned a lesson from 2016 that there are multiple possibilities and outcomes,” said the pollster, granted anonymity to discuss polling data one month before the election. “And if you haven’t learned that lesson, shame on you. That 20 percent outcome can happen. That 30 percent outcome can happen.”

This year, Democrats have history on their side: The incumbent president’s party historically struggles during midterm elections. That wasn’t the case in 2016, when Democrats were trying to win the presidency for three consecutive terms for the first time in their history since Franklin Delano Roosevelt (The GOP accomplished the feat only once in the same period, with Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush.)

Some Democratic leaders say the reality of Trump’s presidency — unlike its hypothetical state in 2016 — changes the dynamic entirely.

“Democratic energy is at nuclear levels,” said Steve Israel, a former DCCC chairman. “Democrats would crawl over broken glass to vote in this election.”

Israel said he still has concerns about November (political operatives always have concerns about the upcoming election). But he waves away the notion that the party might fall short of a House majority.

“Most Democrats and a heck of a lot of Republicans I speak to believe that Democrats will have the majority,” he said. “The real question is, by how much?”

Ferguson is, of course, of two minds: He thinks the push to repeal the Affordable Care Act and the day-to-day reality of Trump’s presidency fundamentally changes how voters will see this election.

But he’s also gun-shy about what could change in the next month, after the multitude of surprises that occurred during the last month of the 2016 race, whether the “Access Hollywood” recording or then-FBI Director James Comey’s announcement that the investigation into Clinton’s emails was re-opened.

Many Republicans argue the 2018 election has already seen its October surprise, with the confirmation fight over Brett Kavanaugh finally motivating conservative voters to vote.

“I don’t know what the October surprises will be,” Ferguson said. “But we make a mistake if we assume that what we’re seeing today is what we’ll see for the entire month. We lived through it two years ago.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service