3ozt6gobts7m9

Al Franken, a Comedian Liberal Democrat Socialist, says Shut up to the PEOPLE..... He represents US not himself pink slip him

Does Al Franken even know what was in the health-care bill he voted for? Um..nope. He lost his cool because he doesn't know what is in the ObamaCare Bill. How competent is this Senator voting for something he hasn't read. Al Franken, a Comedian Liberal Democrat Socialist, says Shut up to the PEOPLE..... He represents US not himself! Please ddidn't your mother teach you better manners are you above manners? above the law? above the WE THE PEOPLE who could vote you OUT? Don't you people hear when we say NO OBAMACARE???? Go back to playing Stuart Smalley and other SNL characters. Politics is not for comedians but for real people. GO BACK TO SNL!


Alan Stuart "Al" Franken (born May 21, 1951) is the junior United States Senator from Minnesota. He is a member of the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, which affiliates with the national Democratic Party.

Franken achieved prominence as a writer and performer for the television show Saturday Night Live from its inception in 1975 before moving to writing and acting in films and television shows. He then became a political commentator, author of five books and host of a nationally syndicated radio show on the Air America Radio network.

In 2008, Franken narrowly defeated incumbent Republican Senator Norm Coleman, by 312 votes, after a mandatory statewide manual recount. Coleman contested the outcome in court,[2] but the Minnesota Supreme Court unanimously upheld Franken's victory on June 30, 2009.[3] Franken was sworn in to the Senate on July 7, 2009.[4][5]

Views: 46

Replies to This Discussion

Franken is a JOCK! Pink slip him. In my opinion he cheated to get elected.

He is a joke.

But I have talked to him and wrote him a lot of letters. It is always better to do something than just bitch.

Are you in his district I voted for Coleman and was so disappointed when he lost. In Minnesota state government there is a bill that can't be anything but a way to rig an election law.

Start by giving your state people a letter One of mine Dan Fabian even answers me. The other Leroy Stumpf is not only a Democrat labor (I'll be damned if they represent farmers) and also an asshole big-time. Hardly ever can even get a machine at his office. I have been focused on so many things at federal level I'm not up to taking the F out of DFL. You have to be in the 7th if you even know about Franken. For a DFL Peterson isn't a bad guy feels like me nobody is taking our guns.

Nice to sort of meet you two.

At Dan Fabian's sort of nudge I will be starting a group in Roseau county. Any problems with that? since you claim to represent the state.

BTW there is a National Tea Party site teaparty.net. They are affiliated with TPNN and have people that represent We The People in DC. Why aren't you guys here combined with them between the two of us we could do more good together don't you think? I mean they went to CPAC and have Paul and Cruz often speak for them. I belong to both places because they don't have a forum like here where you can talk amongst ourselves.

God bless,

Dave Janes

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

judicialwatch.org
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service