We need to get united in taking our state back .

Views: 44

Replies to This Discussion

It's going to be hard work because the Democrats and Republicans were united in overturning the Constitution. They BOTH passed the Military Commissions Act of 2006 that allowed the president to declare ANYONE an "enemy combatant" and strip them of their Constitutional rights.

Although I agree, until We the people show some teeth and have principals to stand on it will never happen. Of my current principals on which I stand is to never again buy from, or support, Government Motors or Chrysler. Rather than fire or demote those individuals that put them in the financial situation they are in, our government had to bail them out with my money. Yet Ford made a profit at the exact same time. So neither automaker can tell me that I am wrong on this. So ask yourself on what do you stand and what are you willing to give up? 

DEMS PLAYING GAMES IN MICHIGAN ............MITT ROMNEY IS A THREAT TO THEM SO THEY ARE BEING ENCOURAGED TO VOTE FOR SANTORUM AND PAUL ..

Ernest Johnson expects to wear an Obama T-shirt to the polls Tuesday, but he'll vote for Republican Ron Paul.

He's calling on supporters of President Barack Obama to make mischief in Tuesday's presidential primary by selecting Paul, a Texas congressman he thinks would have no chance against Obama in November.

Other Democrats are urging the party faithful to request a Republican ballot and vote for former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania -- a candidate many Democrats think the president could defeat more easily than he could Michigan native Mitt Romney.

RSS

Diamond & Silk

Tea Party
Facebook & Twitter

ALERT ALERT

Breaking: Jury Sides With Sheriff Joe
Smacks Down Establishment GOP’s Lawsuit

A jury has sided in favor of conservative icon, former Sheriff Joe Arpaio, against the lawsuit filed by Austin Flake, the son of GOP establishment Senator Jeff Flake, and Austin’s ex-wife, Logan Brown.

Flake and Brown had filed a lawsuit against the Arizona sheriff for “malicious prosecution” after over a dozen dogs died on their watch at a Gilbert dog kennel.

The jury decided Flake and Brown had failed to provide sufficient evidence to back up their accusations of malicious prosecution by Arpaio, The Associated Press reported via Tucson.com.

Flake and Brown ran the kennel while Brown’s parents were out of town in 2014, the AP reported.

The two were still in college.

Initially, Flake and Brown were charged in the incident, but the charges were dropped at the prosecution’s request. Later, Flake’s in-laws pleaded guilty to animal cruelty charges after an expert determined that the facility air conditioner failed because it was not properly maintained.

Thus, the owners of the kennel were responsible for the death of the 21 dogs, and they answered for their crimes.

Nonetheless, Flake and Brown reportedly alleged that Arpaio had charged them to gain publicity and deal damage to Senator Flake — an establishment fixture within the GOP.

The two “contended the charges caused them emotional distress, contributed to the demise of their marriage and led the senator’s son to being suspended from college for an honor-code violation,” according to The Associated Press.

Despite the jury’s decision, the U.S. District Judge Neil V. Wake will not issue a final verdict until the defense explains why it didn’t turn over documents that may have benefited the plaintiffs, according to a statement from the plaintiffs’ attorney to The Associated Press.

“The struggle to hold government officials accountable has always required a steep, perilous climb,” the plaintiffs’ attorney said in a Friday statement according to KNPX.

“Although we disagree with the jury’s verdict, we are grateful we had the opportunity to force former Sheriff Arpaio and his subordinates at Maricopa County to account for their indisputably reckless conduct. Near the end of the trial, we discovered that the County failed to turn over documents that might have helped us prove our case,” he continued.

“The Court has ordered the County to explain its failure and indicated that it will not enter a final judgment in the case until a satisfactory explanation is provided. We will access our future options in this fight when the County complies with the Court’s Order.”

Charges that didn’t pan out are an annoyance to those affected — there’s no question of that.

But to claim that those charges — which were dropped — were the reason behind a failed marriage, and that Arpaio needs to pay is completely ridiculous.

What do you think about this story? Please share this on Facebook and Twitter and let us know!

Are you glad about the jury’s decision? Scroll down to comment below!

YES PATRIOT STORE

© 2017   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service