Information

GEORGIA TEA PARTY

TEA PARTY MEMBERS

Location: THOMSON, GA
Members: 35
Latest Activity: Mar 27, 2015

Discussion Forum

Where is Sec. Kemp when he is needed?

Started by davidfarrar. Last reply by davidfarrar Mar 3, 2012. 3 Replies

As I have just stated; all of Georgia has lost from the recent ruling of Georgia's Fulton County Superior Court Judge: Cynthia Wright, taking away the clear right of Georgia electors to challenge the…Continue

3ozt6gobts7m9

The soluton

Started by 3ozt6gobts7m9 Jul 29, 2011. 0 Replies

Solution: You want him out of the White House don't you? And you think you are going to get him out in the General? Think again! If you get him out in the Primary not the General then you have a…Continue

3ozt6gobts7m9

NO SHARIAH LAW REMOVE THE MOSQUE FROM THE CAPITAL

Started by 3ozt6gobts7m9. Last reply by 3ozt6gobts7m9 Nov 14, 2010. 1 Reply

   NO SHARIAH LAW REMOVE THE MOSQUE FROM THE CAPITALYour infidel taxpayer dollars at work! The dome on Capitol Hill will be gilded in no short order. Where is the separation of mosque and state? Head…Continue

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of GEORGIA TEA PARTY to add comments!

Comment by Gary Wayne Justice on January 7, 2015 at 11:21am

Hello, IS THERE ANY INTELIGENT LIFE OUT THERE!!!!!

If you are scared, then say you are scared!!!!!!!!!!!

I thought  for a moment, that we Ga. Patriots/REDNECKS, was not too much scared of nothing!!!!!

Gary

Comment by Darrin berry on May 5, 2014 at 8:28pm
Locked and loaded ready to help take our country back !
Comment by davidfarrar on January 20, 2014 at 4:21pm

Hi Mr. Brown,

Who are your state house reps in the senate and house...in the General Assembly, that is?

I live in Cedartown. 

Comment by davidfarrar on March 3, 2012 at 8:09am

We have not only suffered a setback in our Georgia case against Obama's name being placed on the March 6, 2012 ballot, but the entire state of Georgia has suffered a setback in its ability to insure candidates placed on a Georgia ballot are qualified to hold the office sought.

If the ruling is left standing, Georgia's electorate will lose their right to challenge the qualifications of the presidential and vice-presidential candidates as Georgia statute: O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5 (a)  Qualifications of candidates for federal and state office; determination of qualifications:


(a) Every candidate for federal and state office who is certified by the state executive committee of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought." clearly states we do have that right, as Judge Malihi recognized in his earlier ruling.

Now we have a Fulton County Superior Court judge telling us, "No, Judge Malihi was wrong. The political parties can place anybody they want on a Georgia ballot for either president of vice-president, Daffy Duck, it doesn't matter if they are qualified or not. The state of Georgia, even though its statute clearly says we do have that right, a Georgia judge, Judge Cynthia Wright, has now taken that right away from all Georgians. I don't think this decision should stand without at least a fight in the state Supreme Court as soon as possible.

What we need now to preserve this all important "legal standing" to bring Obama to justice in a Georgia court of competent jurisdiction is a few good Georgians willing to stand up and do more than talk about their rights.

If you want to respond to this call of freedom in Georgia,  drop me a line at david.naturalborn@gmail.com.

ex animo

davidfarrar

 

Members (34)

 
 
 

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by Jerry Holbert

ALERT ALERT

OMG!! -> Government Now Wants To Seize Your Car For Going 5MPH Over The Limit

We’ve discussed this on and off for several years now. Civil asset forfeiture is a legal process that allows the government to seize assets and cash from citizens without any due process or judicial oversight.

You don’t even have to be charged with a crime. You are assumed guilty unless you can somehow prove your innocence.

Of course, not everyone has this ability… if you aren’t local, state, or federal law enforcement, this is called stealing, and you go to prison.

But the government is actually a bigger problem than common thieves.

A 2015 report showed that law enforcement used civil asset forfeiture to steal more from US residents than every thief, robber, and burglar in America combined.

About $4.5 BILLION worth of cash, cars, homes, and other property is taken by civil asset forfeiture each year – hundreds of millions more than common criminals steal.

And it happens at every level. Your local cop can use civil asset forfeiture just like your state trooper. And then any one of the armed agents of the US government—from the FBI to the Fish and Wildlife Service—can rob you for whatever reason they want.

This travesty continues to grow because the cops who take your stuff get to keep it. Police departments and government agencies around the country depend on civil asset forfeiture to boost their budgets.

Cops will literally keep some of the cars they take as squad cars. And they make a fortune auctioning off the houses, boats, and anything else they confiscate.

Obviously this gives cops an incentive to steal, whether or not they actually think the property was used in a crime, or acquired illegally. Remember, civil asset forfeiture adds billions every year to their bottom line.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case of civil asset forfeiture.

Tyson Timbs was convicted of selling a small amount of drugs to an undercover police officer. He was sentenced to house arrest, and paid about $1,200 in fines.

But then police used civil asset forfeiture to take his $42,000 Land Rover which Timbs purchased with money from a life insurance policy after his father died. The money did not come from selling drugs, or any other illegal activity.

Timbs sued, and the case made its way to the Supreme Court, because every lower court in Indiana said the forfeiture was perfectly legit.

The case revolves around whether or not the seizure of the Land Rover was an excessive fine under the 8th amendment, and whether or not this protection against excessive fines applies to state governments.

And the public got some crazy insight into the government’s position.

The Indiana Solicitor General was arguing in favor of civil asset forfeiture when Justice Stephen Breyer asked him a hypothetical.

Breyer asked, if a state needs revenue, could it force someone to forfeit their Bugatti, Mercedes, or Ferrari for speeding? Even if they were going just 5 miles per hour over the speed limit?

And the utterly appalling answer from the Indiana Solicitor General was, yes.

That’s right… the official government position is that they can steal any amount of your property in “connection” with any crime whatsoever, no matter how trivial the crime may be… even exceeding the speed limit by 5 miles per hour.

This is how overbearing and authoritarian the government has become in the land of the free.

This is how much power your local cop has… and the power only grows as you go to state, and federal officials.

If there is any solace in any of this, it is that the other Supreme Court Justices were reportedly laughing at this exchange.

The justices seemed incredulous that Indiana’s top lawyer was using such absurd assertions and flimsy reasoning in his arguments.

So, for now, we can keep our cars if we get pulled over for speeding. But that may not always be the case…

Depending on how this is ruled, it could pave the way for even more egregious abuses of power… or it could curb the practice, and reign in these thieves in uniforms.

Just understand where the government is coming from. These politicians, bureaucrats and officers think they can do whatever they want. Absolutely anything goes, with no limitation whatsoever.

And that makes it a little tough to feel like you really live in the land of the free.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service