Information

Arkansas Tea Party

Marked by the State Seal, this page is for organizing events and outreach for all of the Arkansas Regions. This state group is intended for Arkansas Patriots with focused discussion, events and attendance possibilities.

Members: 56
Latest Activity: Apr 15, 2017

Discussion Forum

Is the American Dream Fading?

Started by Harvey W. Edwards Jr.. Last reply by Ron Bartels Apr 15, 2012. 2 Replies

As Editor for Arkansas News on TOPIX, you will be seeing Tea party news posted . here is the latest Link to Arkansas News.…Continue

3ozt6gobts7m9

REMOVE THE MOSQUE IN THE CAPITAL

Started by 3ozt6gobts7m9. Last reply by 3ozt6gobts7m9 Nov 14, 2010. 1 Reply

Your infidel taxpayer dollars at work! The dome on Capitol Hill will be gilded in no short order. Where is the separation of mosque and state? Head slap! There s no separation. Mosque is state. (hat…Continue

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Arkansas Tea Party to add comments!

Comment by Linda Cornwell on October 22, 2013 at 10:03am

I am looking for meetings in the Fayetteville area.  I would like to volunteer however, I am unable to drive and must rely on others to get me to this location.

I am available to do things at home to assist.

GO TEA PARTY!  Get this crap out of our government!

Comment by Dr B Leland Baker on March 2, 2012 at 5:28pm

Are there any meetings in West Memphis? I am seeking a local group.

Comment by John Lepera on December 20, 2011 at 8:30pm

I wanted to announce my new book:

Christian TEA Party – Tough Evangelical Activist

There are free chapter samples at www.SpiritImpact.org.

Hopefully you will find it very interesting and helpful.

Thank you,

Pastor John

Comment by Gloria Jean Foster on May 13, 2011 at 6:23am

It sounds like everyone is talking and nobody is listening on this page??

There are no places to comment on what each person said?? We need to communicate, instead of just talk!!

Comment by Gloria Jean Foster on May 11, 2011 at 3:27pm

We need to vote down S. 679, do you want a dictatior? Or a conservative President?

 

Comment by Jon Kidwell on November 29, 2010 at 11:53pm
We fired Blanche... now let's go after Barry O.
Comment by Debrah on October 31, 2010 at 1:35am
First District going RED since about 1884!! GO RICK CRAWFORD!
Comment by Joanne Filiatreau on September 30, 2010 at 7:21am
@Meredith Call
Constance Kenney (870) 449-6831
Forrest Tracy (903) 277-4407
Comment by Meredith Mills on September 30, 2010 at 7:07am
I understand there is a Tea Party meeting near Texarkana, Ar this coming Saturday. Does anyone have any details?
Comment by John Wind Bell on March 27, 2010 at 1:55pm
http://hubpages.com/hub/Obama-ness
How much more do we have to take before we do something !
 

Members (56)

 
 
 

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

ALERT ALERT

 Judge Orders Mueller To Prove  Russia Meddled In Election 

Judge Dabney L. Friedrich

A Washington federal judge on Thursday ordered special counsel Robert Mueller’s team to clarify election meddling claims lodged against a Russian company operated by Yevgeny Prigozhin, an ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, according to Bloomberg.

Concord Management and Consulting, LLC. – one of three businesses indicted by Mueller in February along with 13 individuals for election meddling, surprised the special counsel in April when they actually showed up in court to fight the charges. Mueller’s team tried to delay Concord from entering the case, arguing that thee Russian company not been properly served, however Judge Dabney Friedrich denied the request – effectively telling prosecutors ‘well, they’re here.’

Concord was accused in the indictment of supporting the Internet Research Agency (IRA), a Russian ‘troll farm’ accused of trying to influence the 2016 US election.

On Thursday, Judge Freidrich asked Mueller’s prosecutors if she should assume they aren’t accusing Concord of violating US laws applicable to election expenditures and failure to register as a foreign agent.

Concord has asked Dabney to throw out the charges – claiming that Mueller’s office fabricated a crime, and that there is no law against interfering in elections.

According to the judge’s request for clarification, the Justice Department has argued that it doesn’t have to show that Concord had a legal duty to report its expenditures to the Federal Election Commission. Rather, the allegation is that the company knowingly engaged in deceptive acts that precluded the FEC, or the Justice Department, from ascertaining whether they had broken the law. -Bloomberg

On Monday, Friedrich raised questions over whether the special counsel’s office could prove a key element of their case – saying that it was “hard to see” how allegations of Russian influence were intended to interfere with US government operations vs. simply “confusing voters,” reports law.com.

During a 90-minute hearing, Friedrich questioned prosecutor Jonathan Kravis about how the government would be able to show the Russian defendants were aware of the Justice Department and FEC’s functions and then deliberately sought to skirt them.

“You still have to show knowledge of the agencies and what they do. How do you do that?” Friedrich asked.

Kravis, a prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, argued that the government needed only to show that Concord Management and the other defendants were generally aware that the U.S. government “regulates and monitors” foreign participation in American politics. That awareness, Kravis said, could be inferred from the Russians’ alleged creation of fake social media accounts that appeared to be run by U.S. citizens and “computer infrastructure” intended to mask the Russian origin of the influence operation.

“That is deception that is directed at a higher level,” Kravis said. Kravis appeared in court with Michael Dreeben, a top Justice Department appellate lawyer on detail to the special counsel’s office. -law.com

Concord pleaded not guilty in May. Their attorney, Eric Dubelier – a partner at Reed Smith, has described the election meddling charges as “make believe,” arguing on Monday that Mueller’s indictment against Concord “doesn’t charge a crime.”

“There is no statute of interfering with an election. There just isn’t,” said Dubelier, who added that Mueller’s office alleged a “made-up crime to fit the facts they have.”

Dubelier added that the case against Concord Management is the first in US history “where anyone has ever been charged with defrauding the Justice Department” through their failure to register under FARA.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service