Net Commandos: Agenda 21

Information

Net Commandos: Agenda 21

This group is for those who have found information pertinent to Agenda 21. Also included in this group will be "Sustainable Development", "Green Energy", Population Control, etc....


RGGI will also be in this group...

Members: 36
Latest Activity: Jan 28, 2017

Agenda 21 - RGGI - and other Research info related to

AGENDA 21 is a vast United Nations initiative that may already have been implemented in your town.

In the interest of “saving” the Earth and creating a “sustainable” future, Agenda 21 will dictate:

  • What kind of car you can and cannot drive;
  • Where and when you can travel;
  • Where you can live;
  • What kind of property you can own, if you are allowed to own property;
  • What size family, if any, you can have

“every societal decision be based on environmental impact, focusing on three components; global land use, global education, and global population control and reduction.”

RGGI

 

Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative

When it is implemented – and as you read this, it is being put into place in many American towns – Agenda 21 will change the way you live, because it will change the way you are ALLOWED to live.

Global warming environmentalism has reached a new level of hysteria. Despite countless arguments against it, the issue is not going away, and its backers are more rabid than ever.

Agenda 21 seeks to control how Americans live their lives, presumably in an effort to “save the planet” and “sustain” life on Earth. How did this happen? Slowly, and in relative quiet, so you wouldn’t figure out what was happening and try to stop it!

In June, 1992, more than 178 governments – including the United States of America – adopted the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and the Statement of Principles for the Sustainable Management of Forests at a United Nations conference in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

These were not just typical “go-green” initiatives that would eventually end up being fought through legislation in Congress.

It was the beginning of the systematic destruction of freedom for every American citizen. Just take a look at the map below — this outlines where humans should be permitted and not permitted to go within the United States:

Do these UN ‘experts’ think they are gods!? One thing is certain: the Agenda 21 architects are tyrants in environmentalist clothing.

After the 1992 conference, President Clinton established a Presidential Council on Sustainable Development in 1995, by executive order. That means you and I did not get an opportunity to reject or support the idea.

 

http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2012/04/agenda-21-united-nations-wants-to-abolish-private-property-us-sovereignty/

 

 

 

RGGI

Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative

 

The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) is the first market-based regulatory program in the United States to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. RGGI is a cooperative effort among the states of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Together, these states have capped and will reduce CO2 emissions from the power sector 10 percent by 2018.

States sell nearly all emission allowances through auctions and invest proceeds in consumer benefits: energy efficiency, renewable energy, and other clean energy technologies. RGGI is spurring innovation in the clean energy economy and creating green jobs in each state.

 

http://www.rggi.org/

 

Discussion Forum

Petition the Government

Started by Mary. Last reply by JEAN MACALLISTER Nov 17, 2012. 1 Reply

President Obama needs to be impeached as a traitor for breaking his oath of office to "PRESERVE, protect, and defend the United States Constitution" (Emphasis added), in unconstitutionally expanding…Continue

The Revolution has begun! Divided we fall!

Started by Mary Nov 12, 2012. 0 Replies

Many states have petitioned to leave the union under Obama.  The revolution has been provoked.  But, divided we fall.  Without the U.S. military to defend them, how many states will come under fire…Continue

Spririt of 76 = DON'T TREAD ON ME!

Started by Jonathon Joseph Parker. Last reply by franklin w. miller Aug 16, 2012. 1 Reply

They are already using said "Green Laws" all over the country via the power of "ASSUMED CONSENT" which is much like the illegal rules, regulations and articles imposed by the ILLEGAL IRS, all of…Continue

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Net Commandos: Agenda 21 to add comments!


ADMIN
Comment by Dee on November 20, 2012 at 8:30am
Comment by Edward Ducy on October 31, 2012 at 9:41pm

Linsey- time to make sure you VOTE on Nov. 6th & time to join or start a Militia, also keep an eye on the Southwestern States (esp. Tx., Az., Okla.) as if the POTUS tries to impliment the E.O. some of these states have plans to secede from the Union.  Would be a wise move to move to one of those states.

Comment by Mary on October 31, 2012 at 9:11pm

Once again, President Obama has signed an unconstitutionally-expanded Executive Order giving himself kingship (See the Order:  http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/10/26/executive-ord...).  This new Executive Order unconstitutionally expands the Department of Homeland Security to be the all-encompassing and all-powerful United States authority which answers only to the President.  Mr. Obama claims his actions are being undertaken to stop terrorists, even though his previous actions have actually facilitated jihad inside the United States by prohibiting the criminal intent of jihad, even prohibiting the words "jihad" and "Islam," from being used in the investigation and prosecution of jihad crimes.  Therefore, jihadists can now merely claim their actions were accidents and their true intentions (Islamic jihad and the seditious enforcement of Shariah law) cannot be investigated or prosecuted as sedition, hate crimes against non-Muslims, or acts of war.  Yet, the Department of Homeland Security can, under this new Executive Order, restrict the constitutionally-protected civil liberties and rights of (United States) law-abiding citizens by directly subjecting them to its undefined and unlimited priorities.  This Executive Order establishes and mandates "partnerships" between the Department of Homeland Security and ALL state and local authorities (and even non-governmental agencies such as churches) in order to "support [non-defined] homeland security priorities."  President Obama has, in effect and right before the presidential election, voided the Unites States Constitution and made the United States Government a Communist entity. 

Since the U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder, has been complicit with Mr. Obama's agenda and is not likely to do his job of investigating and prosecuting Mr. Obama for treason and violating his oath of office to "PRESERVE, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States," [Emphasis added], it is up to We the People to make Congress impeach, investigate, and prosecute him and repeal/make void all unconstitutional laws, governmental agency regulations, and Executive Orders.  It will not happen unless We the People unite and demand action.  United we stand, divided we fall.  www.impeachpresidentobama.weebly.com

Comment by InfoWarsTV1 on August 31, 2012 at 11:42am

"One of the new additions to the Republican Party platform is opposition to Agenda 21. In its section on leadership in international organizations, the platform now reads, “We strongly reject the U.N. Agenda 21 as erosive of American sovereignty, and we oppose any form of U.N. Global Tax.”

Comment by carl severino on August 17, 2012 at 9:55am

QUISNO    VERY INFORMATIVE!!!   LIKE IT!! KNEW IT  BUT THERE ARE MANY MANY THAT HAD AND HAVE NO IDEA WHAT IS HAPPENING RIGHT IN THEIR BACKYARD!!!

Comment by Scott Wayt on August 17, 2012 at 7:34am

This long standing effort is aimed at discarding your rights as a parent as well as all the rest...scary! We must act and activate!

Comment by Steven(g)DuaneArchibald(m) on August 16, 2012 at 11:35pm

I will share all that i learn,so help me god,..

Comment by Steven(g)DuaneArchibald(m) on August 16, 2012 at 11:33pm

Anthony"tony"Malone,..Last we spoke,He's still off grid in Lucern Valley!,..the man knows his stuff,..he "was"the renewable energy instructor at Victor Valley College,..He KNOWS how straight up Tessara Solar is!,..Go,..

Comment by carl severino on August 16, 2012 at 10:43pm

EVERY ONE GOOGLE TOM DEWEESE    HE IS THE FOREMSOT AUTHORITY ON AGENDA 21 (SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT)  HE HAS BEEN WRTING AND SPEAKING ABOUT THIS INSIDIOUS UN INTRUSION WITH THE BLESSING OF EVERY PRESIDENT AND LAW MAKERS FOR THE PAST 15  OR MORE YEARS. IN 2004 (I THINK) THE UN MANDATED THAT 400 OF OUR COUNTRIES MAYORS GO TO SAN FRAN SICKO FOR A MEETING WITH THE UN REPS TO DISCUSS THIS AND THEY WERE GIVEN INSTRUCTIONS THEY WERE OBLIDGED TO FOLLOW AND IMPLEMENT INTO THEIR REPECTIVE CITIES   EVERY YEAR THEY GET 3 MORE RULES FOR THEM TO PUT INTO THEIR CITIES!!  ICLEI IS THOROUGHLY EXPLAINE BY DEWEESE!!! 

Comment by Mindy Robinson on August 16, 2012 at 9:58pm

I have been proposing and yes it is possible, divide this nation - libs being kept their dirty cities , consv and tea party can work it out in the rural areas. Other than that proposal - this nation is almost done. Weak. You might want to look at the Australian times, brought to my attention when some of Aussie friends lashed out at me, fear drove their anger. Seems the enemy is picking a fight with China, or is it a set up? The aussies are afraid, their gov is debating whom they will side with. Check it out for yourselves.

 

Members (36)

 
 
 

LIGHTER SIDE

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

Political Cartoons by Mike Lester

ALERT ALERT

Newt Says What The Rest Of Us Are Thinking:
It’s Time To Throw Peter Strzok In Jail

Disgraced FBI special agent Peter Strzok, a senior member of the bureau who gained notoriety in recent months over his anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, was grilled for nearly 10 hours during a joint congressional committee hearing on Thursday.

At issue was Strzok’s anti-Trump texts to former FBI lawyer and lover Lisa Page that coincided with his leading of the investigations into both former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server scandal and the alleged Trump/Russia 2016 election collusion, as well as his involvement in the subsequent Robert Mueller special counsel probe.

The hearing proved to be a heated battle, as Strzok displayed an arrogant smugness in defiance of pointed questions from Republicans that he largely danced around, while Democrats sought to upend and undermine the entire hearing with a plethora of interruptions, parliamentary maneuvers and outright praise for the man who helped let Clinton off the hook while ferociously targeting Trump.

Former House speaker and presidential candidate Newt Gingrich was less than impressed with Strzok’s performance and cooperation in the hearing and suggested during an appearance on Fox Business that the FBI agent should be held in contempt of Congress.

“I think they have to move to hold him in contempt and throw him in jail,” Gingrich said of Congress and Strzok.

“This is a person who is willfully standing up and refusing to appear as a congressional witness and he was a government employee at the time,” he continued.

“He has every obligation to inform the legislative branch, and I don’t think they have any choice except to move a motion of contempt because he is fundamentally — and so is his girlfriend (Page) — they’re both fundamentally in violation of the entire constitutional process,” he added.

Page had been subpoenaed to appear before Congress on Wednesday but refused to appear, saying she’d been unable to review relevant documents prior to the scheduled hearing, a closed-door hearing that has since been rescheduled for Friday.

Gingrich was not the only one who thought Strzok deserved to be held in contempt of Congress, as House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte informed Strzok that he remained at risk of such during the hearing, according to The Daily Caller.

That warning from Goodlatte came after Strzok had refused to answer a straightforward question posed by House Oversight Committee chairman Trey Gowdy, regarding how many people Strzok had personally interviewed between a specific set of dates in relation to the Clinton email investigation.

“Mr. Strzok, please be advised that you can either comply with the committee’s direction to answer the question or refuse to do so,” Goodlatte stated. “The latter of which will place you in risk of a contempt citation and potential criminal liability. Do you understand that? The question is directed to the witness.”

Strzok still refused to answer, citing instructions received from his counsel and the FBI to not answer certain questions on certain topics.

Goodlatte replied, “Mr. Strzok, in a moment we will continue with the hearing, but based on your refusal to answer the question, at the conclusion of the day we will be recessing the hearing and you will be subject to recall to allow the committee to consider proceeding with a contempt citation.”

It is unclear if Goodlatte and the committee ultimately did consider a contempt citation for Strzok following the contentious hearing, nor is it clear if Page will be held in contempt for blowing off her subpoenaed appearance on Wednesday.

Hopefully Congress will follow through on the threats of contempt followed by actual jail time against Strzok and Page in response to their uncooperative behavior and failure to appear when subpoenaed, if only to ensure that future witnesses called before Congress for sensitive or contentious hearings don’t think they can get away with the same sort of behavior.

TEA PARTY TARGET

Cops Sent To Seize Veteran’s Guns Without A Warrant, He Refused To Turn Them Over

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” says Leonard Cottrell, after successfully staving off law enforcement and the courts from confiscating his firearms. Cottrell, an Iraq War veteran, was at work when he received a phone call from his wife. The cops were there, busting in to take his guns away. It all started after a casual conversation his son had at school.

Ammoland reports:

Police said their visit was sparked by a conversation that Leonard Cottrell Jr.’s 13-year-old son had had with another student at the school. Cottrell said he was told his son and the other student were discussing security being lax and what they would have to do to escape a school shooting at Millstone Middle School.

The conversation was overheard by another student, who went home and told his parents, and his mother panicked. The mom then contacted the school, which contacted the State Police, according to Cottrell.

The visit from the troopers came around 10 p.m. on June 14, 2018, Cottrell said, a day after Gov. Phil Murphy signed several gun enforcement bills into law.

After several hours, Cottrell said police agreed not to take the guns but to allow him to move them to another location while the investigation continued.

“They had admitted several times that my son made no threat to himself or other students or the school or anything like that,” he said.

Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was “not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing.”

The troopers searched his son’s room and found nothing, Cottrell said.

“To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” he said. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

“In the Garden State, the usual approach is to confiscate first and ask questions later, and victims of this approach often don’t know their rights. ‎In this case, the victim pushed back and confiscation was avoided — but the circumstances surrounding the incident are outrageous. A student expressing concern over lack of security is not a reason to send police to the student’s home — but it might be a reason to send police to the school to keep students and teachers safe” said Scott L. Bach, executive director of the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs and a member of the NRA board of directors.

NJ.com adds:

Cottrell, a disabled U.S. Army veteran who served three tours during “Operation Iraqi Freedom,” owns a shotgun and a pistol. He has all the correct permits to own the firearms, he said, and predominately uses the shotgun to hunt.

He said his wife allowed the officers to enter the home, and with her permission, they searched his son’s room — but they did not find any weapons, he said. The officers, he said, didn’t have a warrant but still wanted to take his guns. Cottrell wouldn’t let them.

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” he said Thursday.

He said the attempted seizure resulted because of a new law Gov. Phil Murphy signed into law that makes it easier for police to confiscate guns when someone in the state poses a threat to themselves or others. The law is part of a broader statewide effort to make New Jersey’s gun laws even tougher amid the national outcry for more gun control in the wake of the school shooting in Parkland, Florida.

Cottrell said the officers “danced around the issue” when he confronted them about the new law.

A New Jersey State Police spokesman declined to answer questions about whether this incident had anything to do with the new gun laws.

In an email, Sgt. First Class Jeff Flynn said, “Troopers responded to Mr. Cottrell’s residence in reference to the report of a possible school threat. Based on their investigation, it was determined that Mr. Cottrell’s weapons did not need to be seized.”

David Codrea, writing for Ammoland, further added:

To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” New Jersey gun owner and Army veteran Leonard Cottrell Jr. told New Jersey 101.5 after a June 14 visit from State Police,. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

Cottrell was recalling state troopers showing up at his door to confiscate firearms after his 13-year-old son was overheard discussing lax school safety with a friend.

Indoctrinated by a pervasive snitch culture — one that never seems to deter the blatantly obvious demonic nutjobs — the eavesdropping student told his parents, who told school administrators, who in turn called the cops. (Note “If you see something, say something” carries risks of its own – if you report the wrong person, you could end up smeared as a “hater.”)

“Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was ‘not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing,’” the report continued. Despite that, his home is now a “gun free zone” and that has been publicized by the media. He has, in fact, willingly ceded those rights, and by his own words in order to make authorities “happy.”

Before judging him for that, consider the environment that is New Jersey. Then consider the overwhelming force the state can bring to bear, and its predisposition to using it, especially if it’s to enforce citizen disarmament. It’s easy to anonymously declare “Molon Labe” on the internet. In meatspace, resistance is more effective when the aggressor doesn’t get to dictate the time and place, especially if that place is your home and you have family inside.

Appeasing gun-grabbers, generally couched as “compromise,” is impossible. It’s like throwing a scrap of flesh to a circling pack of jackals and expecting them to be sated and leave you alone — instead of sensing opportunity and fear, and moving in closer.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service