WTH? Dirty Cop Mueller Subpoenas Trump’s Deutsche Bank Records… WHERE THE HELL IS JEFF SESSIONS?

WHERE THE HELL IS JEFF SESSIONS?
The absent Attorney General either needs to ACT NOW or STEP DOWN!

There is a coup d’état taking place in Washington DC and the Attorney General is sucking his thumb in the corner, afraid to act!

Dirty Cop Robert Mueller subpoenaed President Donald Trump’s Deutsche Bank records!

And Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel against Donald Trump leaked this to the liberal media!

Bloomberg reported:

Special prosecutor Robert Mueller zeroed in on President Donald Trump’s business dealings with Deutsche Bank AG as his investigation into alleged Russian meddling in U.S. elections widens.

Mueller issued a subpoena to Germany’s largest lender several weeks ago, forcing the bank to submit documents on its relationship with Trump and his family, according to a person briefed on the matter, who asked not to be identified because the action has not been announced.

“Deutsche Bank always cooperates with investigating authorities in all countries,” the lender said in a statement to Bloomberg Tuesday, declining to provide additional information.

Deutsche Bank for months has rebuffed calls by Democratic lawmakers to provide more transparency over the roughly $300 million Trump owed to the bank for his real estate dealings prior to becoming president. Representative Maxine Waters of California and other Democrats have asked whether the bank’s loans to Trump, made years before he ran for president, were in any way connected to Russia. The bank previously rejected those demands, saying sharing client data would be illegal unless it received a formal request to do so. Trump has denied any wrongdoing.

Jeff Sessions needs to step down this week.
America needs an Attorney General who is not afraid of his shadow.

What must they have on Sessions for him to be compromised like this?

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/12/wth-dirty-cop-mueller-subpo...

Views: 88

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Robert Mueller’s connections, what are they? How is Robert Mueller connected to Billionaire Tom Steyer?

Tom Steyer Takes Impeachment Campaign to Times Square

Times Square (Steven Pisano / Flickr / CC / Cropped)

Left-wing billionaire Tom Steyer is taking his campaign to have President Donald Trump impeached to New York’s Times Square, where he will pay for billboards to display the number of signatures on impeachment petitions.

The Hill reports: http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/tom-steyer-takes-impeachme...

 Robert Swan Mueller III, born August 7, 1944) is an American lawyer and civil servant who was the sixth Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation from 2001 to 2013. A Republican, he was appointed by President George W. Bush and his original ten-year term was given a two-year extension by President Barack Obama, making him the longest-serving FBI director since J. Edgar Hoover.

 Simple information to find, the puzzling part is this, once the network started investigating Hillary Clinton's Russian Banks, the FBI counter, is what we see, I would like for the FBI to know our team has all pulled files, not bank files, Robert Mueller, it is impossible for him to not know Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation Laundered American Tax Dollars Through Them Russian Banks, it is all so found in other areas funds for the Uranium One Deal: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b&q=Uranium+One+De...

 Robert Mueller Should We Show More, how much money did you make in the Uranium One Deal?

Yes Kat, I echo your sentiments.

WHERE THE HELL IS JEFF SESSIONS?
Mayberry-esque Attorney General either needs to ACT NOW or STEP DOWN! I'll accept either, he step down or just be FIRED!

There is an actual  coup d’état taking place in Washington DC and the Attorney General is sucking his thumb in the corner, afraid to act! He's hiding under his, so he doesn't have to respond like a real A.G.

I TOTALLY agree.  What the hell happened to Sessions?  He used to be a hard-nosed, Constitutionalist.   Now he's just a chicken-shit little coward.

I do not see how he can truthfully look at himself in the mirror every morning, knowing he is just as much a traitor to this country and to all of us, as hillary is. He is protecting her from all consequences when he should be lazer targeted on her for prison, treason or Gitmo.

People without a conscience have NO problem with that...

Never thought he would be this crooked. Thought he was cowardly, but to keep on ignoring it ALL means he is crooked like the rest of the traitors.

Jefferson Session, one of few, that no dirt has been found against him, this is rare.

Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III (born December 24, 1946) is an American politician and lawyer who is the 84th Attorney General of the United States, in office since 2017. Sessions previously served as a United States Senator from Alabama from 1997 to 2017, and he is a member of the Republican Party. From 1981 to 1993, he served as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama. Sessions was nominated in 1986 to be a judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, but his contentious nomination failed. Sessions was elected Attorney General of Alabama in 1994, and to the U.S. Senate in 1996, being re-elected in 2002, 2008, and 2014. During his time in Congress, Sessions was considered one of the most conservative members of the U.S. Senate.


Sessions was an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama beginning in 1975. In 1981, President Reagan nominated him to be the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama. The Senate confirmed him and he held that position for 12 years until Bill Clinton's Attorney General, Janet Reno, asked for his resignation.

Where is he you ask?

I am having a few check and see if he is ok, there seems to be a possibility only, no one may have not seen, Jeff Session.

Published on Dec 1, 2017- YouTube

AG Jeff Sessions on Sanctuary Cities.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5F_8pH_V2k

Replacing U.S. attorneys stretches back to Reagan

The GOP says the Clinton administration first politicized the Justice Department. But the pattern is older.

March 23, 2007|David G. Savage | Times Staff Writer

WASHINGTON — Three weeks ago, Justice Department officials settled on a "talking point" to rebut the chorus of Democratic accusations that the Bush administration had wrongly injected politics into law enforcement when it dismissed eight U.S. attorneys.

Why not focus on the Clinton administration's having "fired all 93 U.S. attorneys" when Janet Reno became attorney general in March 1993? The idea was introduced in a memo from a Justice Department spokeswoman.

The message has been effective. What's followed has been a surge of complaints on blogs and talk radio that it was the Clinton administration that first politicized the Justice Department.

The facts, it turns out, are more complicated.

In a March 4 memo titled "Draft Talking Points," Justice Department spokeswoman Tasia Scolinos asked, "The [White House] is under the impression that we did not remove all the Clinton [U.S. attorneys] in 2001 like he did when he took office. Is that true?"

That is mostly true, replied D. Kyle Sampson, then chief of staff to Atty. Gen. Alberto R. Gonzales. "Clinton fired all Bush [U.S. attorneys] in one fell swoop. We fired all Clinton [U.S. attorneys] but staggered it out more and permitted some to stay on a few months," he said.

A few minutes later, Deputy Atty. Gen. Paul J. McNulty replied to the same memo.

"On the issue of Clinton [U.S. attorneys], we called each one and had them give us a timeframe. Most were gone by late April. In contrast, Clinton [Justice Department] told all but a dozen in early March to be gone immediately," McNulty said.

The difference appears minor. Both McNulty and Sampson acknowledged that the Bush administration, like the Clinton administration, brought in a new slate of U.S. attorneys within a few months of taking office.

But historical data compiled by the Senate show the pattern going back to President Reagan.

Reagan replaced 89 of the 93 U.S. attorneys in his first two years in office. President Clinton had 89 new U.S. attorneys in his first two years, and President Bush had 88 new U.S. attorneys in his first two years.

In a similar vein, the Justice Department recently supplied Congress with a district-by-district listing of U.S. attorneys who served prior to the Bush administration.

The list shows that in 1981, Reagan's first year in office, 71 of 93 districts had new U.S. attorneys. In 1993, Clinton's first year, 80 of 93 districts had new U.S. attorneys.

Nonetheless, the idea that Clinton and Reno broke with precedent and fired all U.S. attorneys upon taking office has played a key role in the public debate in recent weeks. In conservative media and on talk radio, Reno's abrupt firing of all the U.S. attorneys had been described as extreme and unprecedented.

Tom Corbett, Pennsylvania's attorney general, knows the story firsthand.

"I am the one who took the message," he said in an interview Wednesday.

In 1993, he was the U.S. attorney in Pittsburgh and the liaison between the outgoing George H.W. Bush administration and the incoming Clinton administration. "We had been asking them for months: 'When do you want our resignations?' " he said.

The answer came in a meeting with Webster Hubbell, the associate attorney general, in mid-March. "He said, 'I have good news and bad news. The good news is the attorney general wants you to stay until your successor is confirmed. The bad news is she wants your resignations by the end of the week,' " Corbett said.

He said the demand for resignations by the week's end was surprising.

"We knew this was coming, but it broke with tradition to do it this way," he said. "It didn't make for a smooth transition. By the end of that week, they had backed off a bit. Over the course of the next few months, they made the changes. It was how the message was delivered more than what actually occurred."

Despite Reno's request for all of their resignations, some U.S. attorneys stayed on the job for several more months.

In Los Angeles, for example, Terree A. Bowers, a Republican, became the interim U.S. attorney in 1992, and he served through 1993, Clinton's first year in office.

Nora Manella, Clinton's choice for the post, took over in 1994.

In Pittsburgh, Corbett says he stayed in office until August, when a new Clinton appointee won confirmation.

In New Jersey, Michael Chertoff, a 1990 appointee of President George H.W. Bush, continued into the Clinton administration before leaving in 1994. He is now the Homeland Security secretary.

In western Michigan, John Smietanka, a Reagan appointee, served until the beginning of 1994. "I knew I would be resigning, but I wasn't sure of the timing. I ended up serving for one year of the Clinton administration," he said.

His predecessor, James S. Brady, served as U.S. attorney in Grand Rapids, Mich., during the Carter administration.

http://articles.latimes.com/2007/mar/23/nation/na-talking23

is, Jeff Sessions a part of Hillary Clinton's Corrupt Cabal?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyXxawe0ITk

I found out whats up with Jeff Session, and why he is not talking, they are considering criminal investigations against him for not telling the truth,

Congressman Loses It At Jeff Sessions For Lying About Russia - Full Highlights (Testimony)- YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YA-86Ky9yWo

Robert Mueller, Tom Steyer, Jeff Session, Federal Judge William Orrick  as of now are connected to Jeff Sessions Investigation Into Panama Papers: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b&q=Jeff+Sessions+...

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Gary VarvelPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

ALERT ALERT

Gohmert: Dems Will Drag Out Impeachment — Try To Get ‘Best Socialist’ Nominated For President

During an appearance on Huntsville, AL radio’s WVNN on Thursday, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) offered his best assessment of what House Democrats were trying to accomplish with their impeachment efforts.

Gohmert told WVNN’s “The Jeff Poor Show” impeachment could tie up the Democratic Party’s presidential campaign efforts but predicted Democrats would use the occasion to nominate “the best socialist” they can.

“They would lose in the Senate,” Gohmert said on impeachment. “And besides that, the entire time it was on trial in the Senate, the Democrats who are running for president wouldn’t be allowed to campaign. That’s in the Constitution. They wouldn’t be able to campaign. I just can’t imagine them wanting to do that because if they send it to the Senate, they have now perfectly set up the scenario of 1996, where they will reassure Donald Trump is reelected as president. They don’t want to do that. They’re probably going to drag this thing out as long as they possibly can … through Iowa, through primaries — try to get the best socialist they can to be nominated.”

“Then just end up and say, ‘Now we’re close enough to the general election. We’ve thrown mud at the president through the House,’” he continued. “What they’re really doing — they’re using taxpayer funds to campaign against Trump. That’s all this is — a campaign fund that taxpayers are paying for in order to try to throw mud at the president. I’ll be surprised if they have that vote, but I can’t imagine they want to set up this president for reelection by having a trial in the Senate where they lose.”

Veteran's Day Tribute

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service