WTH? Dirty Cop Mueller Subpoenas Trump’s Deutsche Bank Records… WHERE THE HELL IS JEFF SESSIONS?

WHERE THE HELL IS JEFF SESSIONS?
The absent Attorney General either needs to ACT NOW or STEP DOWN!

There is a coup d’état taking place in Washington DC and the Attorney General is sucking his thumb in the corner, afraid to act!

Dirty Cop Robert Mueller subpoenaed President Donald Trump’s Deutsche Bank records!

And Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel against Donald Trump leaked this to the liberal media!

Bloomberg reported:

Special prosecutor Robert Mueller zeroed in on President Donald Trump’s business dealings with Deutsche Bank AG as his investigation into alleged Russian meddling in U.S. elections widens.

Mueller issued a subpoena to Germany’s largest lender several weeks ago, forcing the bank to submit documents on its relationship with Trump and his family, according to a person briefed on the matter, who asked not to be identified because the action has not been announced.

“Deutsche Bank always cooperates with investigating authorities in all countries,” the lender said in a statement to Bloomberg Tuesday, declining to provide additional information.

Deutsche Bank for months has rebuffed calls by Democratic lawmakers to provide more transparency over the roughly $300 million Trump owed to the bank for his real estate dealings prior to becoming president. Representative Maxine Waters of California and other Democrats have asked whether the bank’s loans to Trump, made years before he ran for president, were in any way connected to Russia. The bank previously rejected those demands, saying sharing client data would be illegal unless it received a formal request to do so. Trump has denied any wrongdoing.

Jeff Sessions needs to step down this week.
America needs an Attorney General who is not afraid of his shadow.

What must they have on Sessions for him to be compromised like this?

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/12/wth-dirty-cop-mueller-subpo...

Views: 91

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Robert Mueller’s connections, what are they? How is Robert Mueller connected to Billionaire Tom Steyer?

Tom Steyer Takes Impeachment Campaign to Times Square

Times Square (Steven Pisano / Flickr / CC / Cropped)

Left-wing billionaire Tom Steyer is taking his campaign to have President Donald Trump impeached to New York’s Times Square, where he will pay for billboards to display the number of signatures on impeachment petitions.

The Hill reports: http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/tom-steyer-takes-impeachme...

 Robert Swan Mueller III, born August 7, 1944) is an American lawyer and civil servant who was the sixth Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation from 2001 to 2013. A Republican, he was appointed by President George W. Bush and his original ten-year term was given a two-year extension by President Barack Obama, making him the longest-serving FBI director since J. Edgar Hoover.

 Simple information to find, the puzzling part is this, once the network started investigating Hillary Clinton's Russian Banks, the FBI counter, is what we see, I would like for the FBI to know our team has all pulled files, not bank files, Robert Mueller, it is impossible for him to not know Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation Laundered American Tax Dollars Through Them Russian Banks, it is all so found in other areas funds for the Uranium One Deal: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b&q=Uranium+One+De...

 Robert Mueller Should We Show More, how much money did you make in the Uranium One Deal?

Yes Kat, I echo your sentiments.

WHERE THE HELL IS JEFF SESSIONS?
Mayberry-esque Attorney General either needs to ACT NOW or STEP DOWN! I'll accept either, he step down or just be FIRED!

There is an actual  coup d’état taking place in Washington DC and the Attorney General is sucking his thumb in the corner, afraid to act! He's hiding under his, so he doesn't have to respond like a real A.G.

I TOTALLY agree.  What the hell happened to Sessions?  He used to be a hard-nosed, Constitutionalist.   Now he's just a chicken-shit little coward.

I do not see how he can truthfully look at himself in the mirror every morning, knowing he is just as much a traitor to this country and to all of us, as hillary is. He is protecting her from all consequences when he should be lazer targeted on her for prison, treason or Gitmo.

People without a conscience have NO problem with that...

Never thought he would be this crooked. Thought he was cowardly, but to keep on ignoring it ALL means he is crooked like the rest of the traitors.

Jefferson Session, one of few, that no dirt has been found against him, this is rare.

Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III (born December 24, 1946) is an American politician and lawyer who is the 84th Attorney General of the United States, in office since 2017. Sessions previously served as a United States Senator from Alabama from 1997 to 2017, and he is a member of the Republican Party. From 1981 to 1993, he served as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama. Sessions was nominated in 1986 to be a judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, but his contentious nomination failed. Sessions was elected Attorney General of Alabama in 1994, and to the U.S. Senate in 1996, being re-elected in 2002, 2008, and 2014. During his time in Congress, Sessions was considered one of the most conservative members of the U.S. Senate.


Sessions was an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama beginning in 1975. In 1981, President Reagan nominated him to be the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama. The Senate confirmed him and he held that position for 12 years until Bill Clinton's Attorney General, Janet Reno, asked for his resignation.

Where is he you ask?

I am having a few check and see if he is ok, there seems to be a possibility only, no one may have not seen, Jeff Session.

Published on Dec 1, 2017- YouTube

AG Jeff Sessions on Sanctuary Cities.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5F_8pH_V2k

Replacing U.S. attorneys stretches back to Reagan

The GOP says the Clinton administration first politicized the Justice Department. But the pattern is older.

March 23, 2007|David G. Savage | Times Staff Writer

WASHINGTON — Three weeks ago, Justice Department officials settled on a "talking point" to rebut the chorus of Democratic accusations that the Bush administration had wrongly injected politics into law enforcement when it dismissed eight U.S. attorneys.

Why not focus on the Clinton administration's having "fired all 93 U.S. attorneys" when Janet Reno became attorney general in March 1993? The idea was introduced in a memo from a Justice Department spokeswoman.

The message has been effective. What's followed has been a surge of complaints on blogs and talk radio that it was the Clinton administration that first politicized the Justice Department.

The facts, it turns out, are more complicated.

In a March 4 memo titled "Draft Talking Points," Justice Department spokeswoman Tasia Scolinos asked, "The [White House] is under the impression that we did not remove all the Clinton [U.S. attorneys] in 2001 like he did when he took office. Is that true?"

That is mostly true, replied D. Kyle Sampson, then chief of staff to Atty. Gen. Alberto R. Gonzales. "Clinton fired all Bush [U.S. attorneys] in one fell swoop. We fired all Clinton [U.S. attorneys] but staggered it out more and permitted some to stay on a few months," he said.

A few minutes later, Deputy Atty. Gen. Paul J. McNulty replied to the same memo.

"On the issue of Clinton [U.S. attorneys], we called each one and had them give us a timeframe. Most were gone by late April. In contrast, Clinton [Justice Department] told all but a dozen in early March to be gone immediately," McNulty said.

The difference appears minor. Both McNulty and Sampson acknowledged that the Bush administration, like the Clinton administration, brought in a new slate of U.S. attorneys within a few months of taking office.

But historical data compiled by the Senate show the pattern going back to President Reagan.

Reagan replaced 89 of the 93 U.S. attorneys in his first two years in office. President Clinton had 89 new U.S. attorneys in his first two years, and President Bush had 88 new U.S. attorneys in his first two years.

In a similar vein, the Justice Department recently supplied Congress with a district-by-district listing of U.S. attorneys who served prior to the Bush administration.

The list shows that in 1981, Reagan's first year in office, 71 of 93 districts had new U.S. attorneys. In 1993, Clinton's first year, 80 of 93 districts had new U.S. attorneys.

Nonetheless, the idea that Clinton and Reno broke with precedent and fired all U.S. attorneys upon taking office has played a key role in the public debate in recent weeks. In conservative media and on talk radio, Reno's abrupt firing of all the U.S. attorneys had been described as extreme and unprecedented.

Tom Corbett, Pennsylvania's attorney general, knows the story firsthand.

"I am the one who took the message," he said in an interview Wednesday.

In 1993, he was the U.S. attorney in Pittsburgh and the liaison between the outgoing George H.W. Bush administration and the incoming Clinton administration. "We had been asking them for months: 'When do you want our resignations?' " he said.

The answer came in a meeting with Webster Hubbell, the associate attorney general, in mid-March. "He said, 'I have good news and bad news. The good news is the attorney general wants you to stay until your successor is confirmed. The bad news is she wants your resignations by the end of the week,' " Corbett said.

He said the demand for resignations by the week's end was surprising.

"We knew this was coming, but it broke with tradition to do it this way," he said. "It didn't make for a smooth transition. By the end of that week, they had backed off a bit. Over the course of the next few months, they made the changes. It was how the message was delivered more than what actually occurred."

Despite Reno's request for all of their resignations, some U.S. attorneys stayed on the job for several more months.

In Los Angeles, for example, Terree A. Bowers, a Republican, became the interim U.S. attorney in 1992, and he served through 1993, Clinton's first year in office.

Nora Manella, Clinton's choice for the post, took over in 1994.

In Pittsburgh, Corbett says he stayed in office until August, when a new Clinton appointee won confirmation.

In New Jersey, Michael Chertoff, a 1990 appointee of President George H.W. Bush, continued into the Clinton administration before leaving in 1994. He is now the Homeland Security secretary.

In western Michigan, John Smietanka, a Reagan appointee, served until the beginning of 1994. "I knew I would be resigning, but I wasn't sure of the timing. I ended up serving for one year of the Clinton administration," he said.

His predecessor, James S. Brady, served as U.S. attorney in Grand Rapids, Mich., during the Carter administration.

http://articles.latimes.com/2007/mar/23/nation/na-talking23

is, Jeff Sessions a part of Hillary Clinton's Corrupt Cabal?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyXxawe0ITk

I found out whats up with Jeff Session, and why he is not talking, they are considering criminal investigations against him for not telling the truth,

Congressman Loses It At Jeff Sessions For Lying About Russia - Full Highlights (Testimony)- YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YA-86Ky9yWo

Robert Mueller, Tom Steyer, Jeff Session, Federal Judge William Orrick  as of now are connected to Jeff Sessions Investigation Into Panama Papers: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b&q=Jeff+Sessions+...

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Chip BokPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Joe Biden Vows: Give Taxpayer-Funded Obamacare To All Illegal Aliens In U.S.

Former Vice President and 2020 Democrat presidential primary candidate Joe Biden is vowing to give Obamacare, funded by American taxpayers, to all 11 to 22 million illegal aliens living in the United States.

During an interview with Telemundo’s Jose Diaz-Balart, Biden forgot that Obamacare technically bans illegal aliens from enrolling in healthcare plans — although illegal aliens are still able to obtain subsidized and free healthcare at Americans’ expense — and promised that under his plan, all 11 to 22 million illegal aliens would be able to get Obamacare.

The exchange went as follows:

DIAZ-BALART: When I … NBC moderated that first debate with you, I didn’t … I don’t recall a clear answer, under your plan should … would the 11, 12 million undocumented immigrants that live in the United States, that have been here many for generations, would they have access …

BIDEN: Yes.

DIAZ-BALART: — to health insurance.

BIDEN: Yes, they … if they can buy into the system like everybody else.

DIAZ-BALART: Because you know, in [Obamacare] they can’t.

BIDEN: Yeah. Yeah, I know. Well they can, that’s my point. They continue to be able to do that.

DIAN-BALART: They cannot under the ObamaCare.

BIDEN: Well and that’s my point, they will though. They will be able to buy into … [illegal aliens] would be able to buy in, just like anyone else could.

Biden joins Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg — among other 2020 Democrats — in committing to forcing American taxpayers to pay for healthcare for illegal aliens who arrive in the U.S.

Already, due to loopholes, American taxpayers are spending nearly $20 billion every year to provide illegal aliens with subsidized healthcare, emergency room visits, and other health services.

Under the 2020 Democrats’ plan to provide taxpayer-funded healthcare to all illegal aliens living in the U.S., Americans would be billed potentially $660 billion every decade just to cover the costs. Other research has found that the plan would cost Americans at least $23 billion every year.

As Breitbart News has reported, experts have said that giving taxpayer-funded healthcare to effectively all foreign nationals who can make it to America’s borders would drive “strong incentives for people with serious health problems to enter the country or remain longer than their visas allow in order to get government-funded care.”

Despite 2020 Democrats’ continued push for taxpayer-funded healthcare for illegal aliens, American voters are overwhelmingly opposed to the plan. The latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News survey revealed that the healthcare-for-illegal-aliens plan is the least popular policy position, with opposition from 62 percent of U.S. voters.

Similarly, a CNN poll from July discovered that 63 percent of likely swing voters oppose providing healthcare to illegal aliens, along with nearly 6-in-10 of all likely U.S. voters and 61 percent of moderates. A Rasmussen Reports survey also found that likely voters, by a majority of 55 percent, oppose giving healthcare to even the most low-income illegal aliens.

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service