Will House GOP Leadership and DACA Task Force Buck Trump's Wishes with DACA Amnesty?



Pres. Trump sat down with FOX News's Sean Hannity on Wednesday night to discuss a number of issues, including his recently released immigration principles. Most of you received an action alert earlier this week on those principles, but you can read more about them here.
The 70-point plan includes a number of top priorities for NumbersUSA, including a requirement that all employers use E-Verify and an end to family chain migration. Pres. Trump spoke specifically about that latter point during his interview with Hannity.
Watch the clip by clicking on the picture below, but here's what the president had to say:
"Chain migration is one of the disasters. You allow one person in, and that one person brings in 10 or 12 people."

-- Pres. Trump, Hannity, October 11, 2017

HOUSE GOP LEADERS READY TO BUCK TRUMP

Despite Pres. Trump's comments and the detailed list of principles, and based on conversations on the Hill, our Capitol Hill team fears that the DACA Task Force and GOP Leadership will settle on legislation that would trade a DACA amnesty with lifetime work permits for a weak border bill introduced by Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas) and a few meaningless enforcement provisions.


We need your URGENT phone calls today to stop this proposal in its tracks!

Below is a list of House GOP Leaders and the DACA Task Force with the contact information for the D.C. offices. Please call every Member on this list telling them that they shouldn't consider anything less than what Trump proposed in his priorities.
We must derail this proposal before it becomes a reality!

HOUSE GOP LEADERSHIP


Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) -- (202) 225-3031

Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) -- (202) 225-2915

Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) -- (202) 225-3015

GOP Conference Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.) -- (202) 225-2006

HOUSE DACA TASK FORCE
Rep. John Carter (R-Texas) - (202) 225-3864
Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.) - (202) 225-4211
Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) - (202) 225-5431
Rep. Will Hurd (R-Texas) - (202) 225-4511
Rep. Raul Labrador (R-Idaho) - (202) 225-6611
Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas) - (202) 225-2401
Rep. Martha McSally (R-Ariz.) - (202) 225-2542
Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wisc.) - (202) 225-5101

Again, please call every Member (or as many as you can) on this list and demand that they don't consider anything less than Pres. Trump's full list of immigration principles.

It's been the voices of millions of NumbersUSA activists and other concerned Americans that have brought the issue of chain migration to the forefront, and there's finally an administration that understands the harmful impacts that chain migration has on American workers and the long-term sustainability of the American quality of life.

https://www.numbersusa.com/

Views: 42

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Thanks Kat, got it.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

judicialwatch.org
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service