WHY MAINSTREAM MEDIA WEBSITES ARE CENSORING & REMOVING COMMENT SECTIONS

Google’s new tool, Perspective, works by comparing comments left on news websites to comments left on Wikipedia and the New York Times that were deemed “toxic” by a team of human reviewers.

The only criteria given for what constitutes a “toxic” comment is that it causes someone to leave a conversation. Obviously, this could also include someone who lost a debate or who is merely offended or triggered by another comment.

With trust in mainstream media plummeting, the real goal behind the censorship and in some cases entire removal of comment sections is to manipulate public opinion.

As the Daily Tech revealed, Popular Science admitted that the decision to pull its comment section was in order to preach a “scientific doctrine” on global warming without being challenged.

Popular Science acknowledged that their decision was based on a study by Dominique Brossard, a Life Sciences Communication professor at the Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, that appeared in the February 2013 edition of the peer-reviewed Journal of Computer-Mediated Communications.

read more:

http://www.infowars.com/why-mainstream-media-websites-are-censoring...

 

And this is what you have going on right now with mainstream media outlets. They are supposed to be allowing US citizens discuss and fact check their articles but now your seeing their own personal bias become the news. Big shout out to Infowars!

Views: 717

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Frank, your work is amazing!!!!!

This just smacks of censorship big media is not worth a dime

If looking at a story I might want to read our  not want to read, I looked to see the comments section if there isn't one I won't read that particular story at least on that site.

The thought police are in full swing. We are being divided into two clear halves in this country and in the world. Something is going to have to happen, imho.

The two-"state"  (or multi-"state") EVOLUTION is coming to the usoa. 

LIVE FREE  or  DIE

BUT TO BE MORE ACCURATE

WE WILL LIVE FREE

IF THEY HAVE TO DIE

PERIOD

Do not disagree, but this EVOLUTION should be peaceful - where each HSS gets what they want.  But time will tell?    

  The left wing Communist media have been expossed as the propganda arm of the libernazi/Communist/ democratic party for a long time. They, the MSM have been caught SO MANY TIMES pushing outright LIES to support the left wing agenda it's sickening. 

  So this is NO face palm moment !

Frankly, the boldness of this censorship indicates two undeniables. These people are dedicated to the Socialist Agenda & they're confidant it will be realized.

And yet, they accuse conservatives of being "Nazis", for ONE example, when they are doing the WORST things that we criticized COMMUNISTS for, for many years! I guess now being a COMMUNIST is better than nazi so it is ok to them!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Angry Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’: Pam Karlan Donated Thousands To Hillary And Was On Clinton’s List For Potential SCOTUS Nomination

Image result for Pam Karlan

The House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jerrold Nadler, kicked off its first impeachment circus Wednesday morning.

The four ‘witnesses’ testifying have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand — the four witnesses are law professors offering legal analysis.

One of the witnesses the Dems rolled out is an angry Hillary Clinton donor who was on Crooked’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

No wonder why this unhinged, dowdy woman is so pissed off!

“Professor Pam Karlan donated thousands of dollars to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. So she certainly has no vendetta against President Trump,” GOP Rep. Mark Walker said.

Congressman Walker also pointed out that Noah Feldman, the Dems first partisan witness in Wednesday’s hearing tweeted about impeaching Trump right after he was sworn in.

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

Meet Noah Feldman, House Democrats first partisan witness.

Look at the date of this tweet. He has been trying to get @realDonaldTrump impeached since 46 days into his presidency.

His reason? Trump criticized President Obama.

This is a sham impeachment with sham witnesses. https://twitter.com/NoahRFeldman/status/839185127494254592 

Noah Feldman @NoahRFeldman

Trump's wiretap tweets raise risk of impeachment http://bv.ms/2mY1ueX  via @BV

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker
 

The next witness, Karlan, has donated thousands to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

So she certainly has no vendetta against @realDonaldTrump.

These witnesses are as serious as House Democrats impeachment case: not at all.

The entire sham show trial is stacked with partisan hacks who have wanted to impeach Trump from the moment he won in November of 2016.

Norm Eisen, the Democrats’ counsel who is blasting Trump and questioning witnesses in Wednesday’s show trial, tweeted about impeaching Trump before Donald Trump was even sworn into office!

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service