WHY MAINSTREAM MEDIA WEBSITES ARE CENSORING & REMOVING COMMENT SECTIONS

Google’s new tool, Perspective, works by comparing comments left on news websites to comments left on Wikipedia and the New York Times that were deemed “toxic” by a team of human reviewers.

The only criteria given for what constitutes a “toxic” comment is that it causes someone to leave a conversation. Obviously, this could also include someone who lost a debate or who is merely offended or triggered by another comment.

With trust in mainstream media plummeting, the real goal behind the censorship and in some cases entire removal of comment sections is to manipulate public opinion.

As the Daily Tech revealed, Popular Science admitted that the decision to pull its comment section was in order to preach a “scientific doctrine” on global warming without being challenged.

Popular Science acknowledged that their decision was based on a study by Dominique Brossard, a Life Sciences Communication professor at the Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, that appeared in the February 2013 edition of the peer-reviewed Journal of Computer-Mediated Communications.

read more:

http://www.infowars.com/why-mainstream-media-websites-are-censoring...

 

And this is what you have going on right now with mainstream media outlets. They are supposed to be allowing US citizens discuss and fact check their articles but now your seeing their own personal bias become the news. Big shout out to Infowars!

Views: 717

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Image result for thought police

One of the several reason I don't do Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, you-name-it

Image result for thought police

Image result for thought police

The hatred from the political Left is overflowing like that Oroville Dam in California. It was cresting before November 8, 2016 and overflowed after the election. Liberal Democrats have never accepted the election result.aaA great many mistake Trump's direct bombastic style as confrontational and like he is picking a fight all the time. They regard his less than articulate style as incompetence. So he is not a smooth talker like so many of them politicians.
Look what all these smooth talking politicians have accomplished in DC:
A national debt that is now almost $20 trillion, an influx of illegals in the tens of millions, a southern border with Mexico that is more porous than the filter in a coffee brewer, a US military that is so weakened we are lucky the Russians, Chinese, North Koreans and Iranians held back and did not mount or stage a more serious provocative confrontational military challenge against the USA here at the home front or
elsewhere in the world. These smooth talkers say things gullible people want to hear. Once they get the votes and are elected into high office, their allegiance switches quicker than the rampaging waters off that leaking dam in California.
I have said it before. I will say it again. These liberal Democrats including the MSM are wrong about Donald J Trump. They are on the wrong side of history.
Enough said.

It's as if the NWO is taking the lead from George Orwell's novels, 'Animal Farm'  and '1984'... written in the late 40's, these novels present us with some very startling parallels, prophetic insights into todays ruling class...  If one wants a good read, with insights into todays leftist dogma and propaganda driven world... these two novels would serve them well.

Was George Orwell a GENIUS or just lucky ? ( PROPHETIC ) An ancient con used to make money by predicting the future of the GULLIBLE ! 

Inspired prophecy is not profit centered... Mr. Orwell was a genius and quasi prophet by any standard of examination... he was gifted with a perceptive view of the future...

Orwell's work continues to influence popular and political culture... The term Orwellian.. is descriptive for totalitarian social practices...  this term and more have entered our language with many neologisms, including: Cold war, Big Brother, Thought Police, Room 101, Memory hole, Newspeak, doublethink, and thougthcrime...  Given his proclivity to describe future events, with such detail, one might call him a modern day prophet.

WELL  SAID   COL.

Atlas Shrugged also hits the nail on the head.

Actually Ayn Rand's, 'Atlas Shrugged' is a little convoluted... so many people disappearing.  Where is John Galt... may be beyond some to understand... too, connect the dots.  However, George Orwell's dystopian classics are clear, entertaining and easily understood...

John Galt .... is holding up a bridge in CHICAGO

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Angry Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’: Pam Karlan Donated Thousands To Hillary And Was On Clinton’s List For Potential SCOTUS Nomination

Image result for Pam Karlan

The House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jerrold Nadler, kicked off its first impeachment circus Wednesday morning.

The four ‘witnesses’ testifying have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand — the four witnesses are law professors offering legal analysis.

One of the witnesses the Dems rolled out is an angry Hillary Clinton donor who was on Crooked’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

No wonder why this unhinged, dowdy woman is so pissed off!

“Professor Pam Karlan donated thousands of dollars to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. So she certainly has no vendetta against President Trump,” GOP Rep. Mark Walker said.

Congressman Walker also pointed out that Noah Feldman, the Dems first partisan witness in Wednesday’s hearing tweeted about impeaching Trump right after he was sworn in.

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

Meet Noah Feldman, House Democrats first partisan witness.

Look at the date of this tweet. He has been trying to get @realDonaldTrump impeached since 46 days into his presidency.

His reason? Trump criticized President Obama.

This is a sham impeachment with sham witnesses. https://twitter.com/NoahRFeldman/status/839185127494254592 

Noah Feldman @NoahRFeldman

Trump's wiretap tweets raise risk of impeachment http://bv.ms/2mY1ueX  via @BV

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker
 

The next witness, Karlan, has donated thousands to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

So she certainly has no vendetta against @realDonaldTrump.

These witnesses are as serious as House Democrats impeachment case: not at all.

The entire sham show trial is stacked with partisan hacks who have wanted to impeach Trump from the moment he won in November of 2016.

Norm Eisen, the Democrats’ counsel who is blasting Trump and questioning witnesses in Wednesday’s show trial, tweeted about impeaching Trump before Donald Trump was even sworn into office!

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service