When people think of humanity's greatest evils, why is "communism" rarely mentioned? After all, it has caused more suffering than any other ideology, included?

 My gosh, lets see our Illuminati Jewish Khazar Congress, could not keep a facts check correct if they tried to lie...:)

 How did the Khazar's become Jewish? Through rape of Jewish women, called the 10 tribes, one was the Tribes of Dan. The Khazar's even raped their own children. The Khazar's came out of the area of the Russian Empire.

 The now so called fake Khazar's Jews in control of America and Israel, move toward the Tower Of Babel, to rebuild it.

 Jewish history it was first listed that 12 million Jews died by Hitler, that was a lie, then 6 million, then 4 million, and now its listed as "1.5 million Million Rothschild Russian Khazar Jews were killed by Germany".

All total was around 170 million Jews murder by Russia, the British Empire and the Khazar Jewish in Control of Congress in America.


Why Isn't Communism as Hated as Nazism?- YouTube

Views: 34

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

 They are bias of the truth.

Why?  Because our public schools and many of our institutions and politicians, including the MSM have painted Communism as the answer to every social problem ... while blamiing capitalism for every evil act in the world. 

Why... because, we live in a time when the public schools have been teaching our children that America and Capitalism are evil... wicked and oppressive... for decades.  Our children watch Hollywood as it destroys any sense of loyalty to the capitalist system in America and our heritage.  The MSM backs up the dialogue of the leftist with inflamitory reports of America's failures... while, promoting socialism and its big brother Communism as the answer to our ills.  That's why...

Big brother Communism, in America

Take it up with Russia...:)-

The Socialist International is much bigger than Russia... and the only thing that will stop them is force of arms.  I am afraid my paltry efforts to reverse their plans are insignificant.

I know they are called Khazar's ....:) Burn The Banks...:)

Sounds like an opportunity for Women to show the world how it is done... burn those Bra's in the  lobbys of the bank and BUST the Banks...  permanently... Exercise that Kitty Power... or was that... some other kind of power?

Burning Banks will only make matters worse... it will collapse the  worlds economy. Besides, how are you ladies going to go shopping without access to an ATM or Credit Cards... there isn't enough paper currency in circulaiton to replace the losses in lines of credit available using credit cards.

Sounds like an opportunity for Women to show the world how it is done, that is so cute...:)





Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service