WHY I COULD NEVER
BE A LIBERAL
by Burt Prelutsky
If you want to Comment directly to Burt Prelutsky, please mention my name Rudy. burtprelutsky@icloud.com 

It isn’t just that I disagree with liberals on such issues as open borders, abortions on demand, same-sex marriages, transgender bathrooms, legalizing marijuana and providing free services for illegal aliens, it’s that political partisanship, not core principles, determines their positions on everything.

The mere fact that they allow bozos like Chuck clown-Schumer, Nancy Pulosi, mad-Maxine Waters, Luis Gutiérrez, scum-Dick Durbin, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and Eric Swalwell, to speak for them displays their ignorance and hypocrisy.

Because liberals must park their skepticism at the curb when it comes to their political icons, they can’t even bring themselves to acknowledge that Barack liar-nObama was a black racist or that he wiped his feet on the Constitution, not only when he exceeded his authority by granting amnesty to hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens; but when he encouraged left-wing mayors and governors to flout federal law by declaring their cities and states sanctuaries; and, again, when he ordered the FBI and Justice Department to misuse their powers and the FISA courts to surveil his political and media enemies.

It has been pointed out that liar-nObama militarized the IRS, the FBI, the EPA and the Justice Department. In fact, the only part of the federal government that he was reluctant to militarize was, ironically, the U.S. military.

Liberals are unwilling to acknowledge the truth about their icons even after all the facts have come out. For instance,liar-Hillary Clinton has always been an enabler of male scumbags, ranging from her own husband to devout Muslims to campaign aide Burns Strider, but millions of left-wing females continue to treat her with respect, even adoration; blindly accepting her word for it that, contrary to all the evidence, she is a staunch defender of women. Anyone who can believe such obvious, self-serving, drivel would have been capable of believing that Stalin and Hitler were equally staunch defenders of Christians and Jews.

*  It takes all the will power I possess not to throw a shoe at the TV every time I see some Democrat show up on Fox News, insisting the only reason that I and the rest of you now distrust the FBI, the FISA Courts, the Justice Department, Robert Mueller, James Comey and Peter Strzok, is because we are Republicans and have been brainwashed by Trump.

As usual, the likes of clown-Schumer, Pulosi, scum-Durbin, Blumenthal, mad-Waters and scum-Schiff, have it backward. Speaking for myself, I am a Republican partly because I now distrust the FBI, the FISA Courts, the Justice Department, Robert Muller, James Comey and Peter Strzok, and because Donald Trump is saying the things I have been saying for the past 30 years and doing or at least trying to do the things I’ve wanted to see done.

*  One of my readers, Robert Moore, a member of the military, perfectly summed up the conference that took place recently in Davos, Switzerland, when he wrote: “It was billionaires telling millionaires what the middle class should do to help the poor.”

I was reminded of a gag line that summed up Hollywood in the old days when the town was regularly churning out movies about charming, all-knowing, occasionally crooning, priests. The joke was that Jewish studio heads were making movies that told Protestants how to be better Catholics.

* Speaking of which, it has long been a fact that most of America’s favorite Christmas songs were written by Jews. One of whom was Irving Berlin, who was brought to America by his Russian Jewish parents.

He was so patriotic that when he wrote “God Bless America,” which nearly became our National Anthem, he created the God Bless America Fund in order to funnel the song’s royalties to the Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts.

Although he was one of America’s most prolific songwriters, he couldn’t read music. He would compose at the piano, playing only on the black keys. When he was finished, he had a guy transcribe what he had played.

One day, he told his assistant that he had not only just composed his greatest song, but the greatest song anyone had ever composed.

One can argue the point, but “White Christmas” has certainly out-sold every other song ever written. Written for a Bing Crosby-Fred Astaire movie, “Holiday Inn,” Crosby’s version, alone, has sold over 50 million records. When you count up all the other versions, the number tops 100 million.
If you want to Comment directly to Burt Prelutsky, please mention my name Rudy. burtprelutsky@icloud.com 

Views: 21

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Explaining Liberal Millennial Psychology

"If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?" - The Mad Hatter, Alice in Wonderland.

Explaining millennial liberal psychology contains the process whereby people internalise ideas, which produce actions that lead to consequences based on belief, leading to horrors typically viewed daily throughout western society. Usually, the individual assumes that their reasoning contains logic and objectivity, yet preferences and bias predominate and the type of society wished for becomes based on expectations of how we view the world around us. The deception occurs because the brain processes stimuli differently and in the liberal mind produces reality based on perception, letting bias intervene. The world, or its immediate surroundings, becomes what our bias assumes - a virtual reality. Conversely, the objectivity of reality, a bottom-up processing of information arising from the frontal cortex, demands inquiry, based on scientific evidence. Living in a virtual reality based on subjectivity, produces the alienation of a lost generation as it forms a collective, removing individuality and opening itself to external belief influences.
Liberal character building

Explaining the psychology of identity politics

Millennial beliefs v reality

Liberalism as a mental illness

Explaining liberal morality

A liberal hell paved with good intentions

Read the full article 
here

It isn't that the Left... blindly accept the word of people like Hillary ... it is that they agree with it and worse see nothing wrong with it.  Liberalism is definitely a mental disorder of the first degree.

Ronald and Frankmusic

O-so true. Couldn't explain it any different but it sure gets me mad at times when they say dump things that don't make common sense. Especially the black liberals. They don't see the sense or understand what they stand for.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service