White COP Kidnapped and Murdered by Black Men… Where’s the Media?

To the media, all life doesn’t have the same value.

While the examination of the death of Michael Brown consumes newscasts, a dead white cop killed by black men has garnered scarcely any attention.

The incident took place in Waynesboro, Va.

Police Officer Kevin Quick, a member of the Waynesboro Police Department, was abducted by four African-American men. 

The men, who allegedly had ties with a Los Angeles-based gang, took Officer Quick to an ATM to withdraw money.

Quick was then driven to the forest and killed execution-style by the gang members.

It’s alleged that the motive for the killing was to allow the four suspects to move up in the gang hierarchy by proving their toughness.

The case received little to no attention until this weekend, when a letter to the editor in the Lowell (Mass.) Sun brought the case back into the internet spotlight.

“Nowhere in the national media was this murder of a police officer put to paper,” the letter read.

“But when a white police officer shot a black man named Michael Brown in Missouri, it made the national news for months.”

read more:


Views: 2036

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I see no other way.

ya know Frank I was saying the same thing a couple of years ago about Obama wanting to create a situation close to an election so he  could declare martial ,law, cancel the election and remain in power. Now when I see him there are a lot of times he looks ragged, has that fed up look. He looks like he wants to go.I also think he is ready to dump Michelle to live the life he wants. Maybe his big money string puppet masters have someone in the shadows trained, molded and brain-washed to take over. I am sure there have been people bought, bribed, blackmailed, threatened, or their loved ones threatened! 



whites need to start with a white leader speaking up and starting a march against the media not reporting the news and demanding justice like sharpton&blacks do.

I am not well liked anyway.  Does not bother me.  I think if every night, at least one marxists  it would be good for America.

we the people,who are the real government.at this point we neither care or listen to what ovomit/satan or eric{i,m in contempt of court}holder or al shipton jesse jackson or any of them say or do.means absolutly nothing to us.or the bought and paid for treasonous lame stream medias print say or don,t say,as we haven,,t listened to any of them in years,we have our own medias which work fine.and yes i am a racist,i racist my 55 chevy once a month at englishtown.and it has red interior so i must be a communist also,with red interior.point is be your own person.live for yourselfs.stay alerted/focused/prepared.god bless all legal american veterans/citizens

A red 55 Chevy? Be still my heart.


To view this as a web page, click here
Tea Party News

BREAKING NEWS! House Rejects Obama’s Executive Action on Immigration…Read the latest now on TeaParty.org

Okay, look Friend.

Obama did it—he granted amnesty by executive order. But...

There was one thing he wasn't counting on—the gaping hole in his executive order.

When we discovered this hole we immediately set our teams into action.

You won't believe what is going on behind closed doors, on park benches, in secret government rooms and in the barrooms, bathrooms and situation rooms in DC right now.

We have teams in Washington, meeting with lawmakers, liaisons and even support staff. Our special field operatives are working the DC circuit—all in an effort to take advantage of this loophole and give Congress the ammunition they need to stop it.

If you can give $25, $50 or $100 right now it would really go a lon...

When you hear what it is that can blow Obama's plan to pieces you're going to love it.

But to stop them I need you and every red-blooded American who lives and dies by our Constitution and the words of our founding fathers to step forward.

We have to launch a campaign to blast the new Congress, letting them know that We the People DEMAND they change the statute Obama's executive order for amnesty is predicated on.

Yes, folks THAT is the loophole.

Obama's executive order is not based on the Constitution. Therefore, all the new Congress has to do is go in and change the statute it is based on. Forget pulling the funding.

Change the statute and amnesty is toast.

I'm asking you to give a donation of a few dollars or a few hundred, whatever you can do, to help us blow Obama's executive order out of the water.

We are in the final countdown. The new Congress will be in session in just weeks.We have very little time to storm Washington with our messages.

There are letters, faxes and emails that must go out. Petitions and notices have to be sent and calls made around the country.

I would like to launch rallies, protests and demonstrations around the country right away...but it cannot happen without your financial support.

Please, tell me what you can donate.

We must create a massive groundswell like never before to force Congress to end-run the president to change the statute.

Folks, we can't wait. Make your donation today.

It's up to you to make this happen.

Steve Eichler

P.S. - Patriots Make it happen! Hey, what's the last good thing you remember Obama doing for America? Obamacare? VA deaths? Terrorist-for-traitor trade? Amnesty for illegals? Enough said. America's most dangerous president continually stains the office of the President of the United States with his patterns of abuse.We're ready to make millions of calls across America to stop him—all we need is you. Donate today!

This email is never sent unsolicited. You have received this Teaparty.org email because you subscribed to it or someone forwarded it to you. To opt out, see the links below.

If this email has been forwarded to you and you would like to sign up:

For information on advertising with TeaParty.org, please contact:

Remove your email address from our list. We respect your right to privacy. View our policy.

This email was sent by: Teaparty.org
Tea Party
Post Office Box 96967
Washington D.C. 20090-6967


Guess it's time to break out the 30.06 and do some gar hunting.

We fight fire with fire.

We just need to have a bigger fire.

It's the topsy turvey situation our Government has created through the media, want to know how it turns out? Watch The Rise of the Third Reich...



Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

Political Cartoons by Mike Lester


Newt Says What The Rest Of Us Are Thinking:
It’s Time To Throw Peter Strzok In Jail

Disgraced FBI special agent Peter Strzok, a senior member of the bureau who gained notoriety in recent months over his anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, was grilled for nearly 10 hours during a joint congressional committee hearing on Thursday.

At issue was Strzok’s anti-Trump texts to former FBI lawyer and lover Lisa Page that coincided with his leading of the investigations into both former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server scandal and the alleged Trump/Russia 2016 election collusion, as well as his involvement in the subsequent Robert Mueller special counsel probe.

The hearing proved to be a heated battle, as Strzok displayed an arrogant smugness in defiance of pointed questions from Republicans that he largely danced around, while Democrats sought to upend and undermine the entire hearing with a plethora of interruptions, parliamentary maneuvers and outright praise for the man who helped let Clinton off the hook while ferociously targeting Trump.

Former House speaker and presidential candidate Newt Gingrich was less than impressed with Strzok’s performance and cooperation in the hearing and suggested during an appearance on Fox Business that the FBI agent should be held in contempt of Congress.

“I think they have to move to hold him in contempt and throw him in jail,” Gingrich said of Congress and Strzok.

“This is a person who is willfully standing up and refusing to appear as a congressional witness and he was a government employee at the time,” he continued.

“He has every obligation to inform the legislative branch, and I don’t think they have any choice except to move a motion of contempt because he is fundamentally — and so is his girlfriend (Page) — they’re both fundamentally in violation of the entire constitutional process,” he added.

Page had been subpoenaed to appear before Congress on Wednesday but refused to appear, saying she’d been unable to review relevant documents prior to the scheduled hearing, a closed-door hearing that has since been rescheduled for Friday.

Gingrich was not the only one who thought Strzok deserved to be held in contempt of Congress, as House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte informed Strzok that he remained at risk of such during the hearing, according to The Daily Caller.

That warning from Goodlatte came after Strzok had refused to answer a straightforward question posed by House Oversight Committee chairman Trey Gowdy, regarding how many people Strzok had personally interviewed between a specific set of dates in relation to the Clinton email investigation.

“Mr. Strzok, please be advised that you can either comply with the committee’s direction to answer the question or refuse to do so,” Goodlatte stated. “The latter of which will place you in risk of a contempt citation and potential criminal liability. Do you understand that? The question is directed to the witness.”

Strzok still refused to answer, citing instructions received from his counsel and the FBI to not answer certain questions on certain topics.

Goodlatte replied, “Mr. Strzok, in a moment we will continue with the hearing, but based on your refusal to answer the question, at the conclusion of the day we will be recessing the hearing and you will be subject to recall to allow the committee to consider proceeding with a contempt citation.”

It is unclear if Goodlatte and the committee ultimately did consider a contempt citation for Strzok following the contentious hearing, nor is it clear if Page will be held in contempt for blowing off her subpoenaed appearance on Wednesday.

Hopefully Congress will follow through on the threats of contempt followed by actual jail time against Strzok and Page in response to their uncooperative behavior and failure to appear when subpoenaed, if only to ensure that future witnesses called before Congress for sensitive or contentious hearings don’t think they can get away with the same sort of behavior.


Cops Sent To Seize Veteran’s Guns Without A Warrant, He Refused To Turn Them Over

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” says Leonard Cottrell, after successfully staving off law enforcement and the courts from confiscating his firearms. Cottrell, an Iraq War veteran, was at work when he received a phone call from his wife. The cops were there, busting in to take his guns away. It all started after a casual conversation his son had at school.

Ammoland reports:

Police said their visit was sparked by a conversation that Leonard Cottrell Jr.’s 13-year-old son had had with another student at the school. Cottrell said he was told his son and the other student were discussing security being lax and what they would have to do to escape a school shooting at Millstone Middle School.

The conversation was overheard by another student, who went home and told his parents, and his mother panicked. The mom then contacted the school, which contacted the State Police, according to Cottrell.

The visit from the troopers came around 10 p.m. on June 14, 2018, Cottrell said, a day after Gov. Phil Murphy signed several gun enforcement bills into law.

After several hours, Cottrell said police agreed not to take the guns but to allow him to move them to another location while the investigation continued.

“They had admitted several times that my son made no threat to himself or other students or the school or anything like that,” he said.

Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was “not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing.”

The troopers searched his son’s room and found nothing, Cottrell said.

“To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” he said. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

“In the Garden State, the usual approach is to confiscate first and ask questions later, and victims of this approach often don’t know their rights. ‎In this case, the victim pushed back and confiscation was avoided — but the circumstances surrounding the incident are outrageous. A student expressing concern over lack of security is not a reason to send police to the student’s home — but it might be a reason to send police to the school to keep students and teachers safe” said Scott L. Bach, executive director of the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs and a member of the NRA board of directors.

NJ.com adds:

Cottrell, a disabled U.S. Army veteran who served three tours during “Operation Iraqi Freedom,” owns a shotgun and a pistol. He has all the correct permits to own the firearms, he said, and predominately uses the shotgun to hunt.

He said his wife allowed the officers to enter the home, and with her permission, they searched his son’s room — but they did not find any weapons, he said. The officers, he said, didn’t have a warrant but still wanted to take his guns. Cottrell wouldn’t let them.

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” he said Thursday.

He said the attempted seizure resulted because of a new law Gov. Phil Murphy signed into law that makes it easier for police to confiscate guns when someone in the state poses a threat to themselves or others. The law is part of a broader statewide effort to make New Jersey’s gun laws even tougher amid the national outcry for more gun control in the wake of the school shooting in Parkland, Florida.

Cottrell said the officers “danced around the issue” when he confronted them about the new law.

A New Jersey State Police spokesman declined to answer questions about whether this incident had anything to do with the new gun laws.

In an email, Sgt. First Class Jeff Flynn said, “Troopers responded to Mr. Cottrell’s residence in reference to the report of a possible school threat. Based on their investigation, it was determined that Mr. Cottrell’s weapons did not need to be seized.”

David Codrea, writing for Ammoland, further added:

To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” New Jersey gun owner and Army veteran Leonard Cottrell Jr. told New Jersey 101.5 after a June 14 visit from State Police,. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

Cottrell was recalling state troopers showing up at his door to confiscate firearms after his 13-year-old son was overheard discussing lax school safety with a friend.

Indoctrinated by a pervasive snitch culture — one that never seems to deter the blatantly obvious demonic nutjobs — the eavesdropping student told his parents, who told school administrators, who in turn called the cops. (Note “If you see something, say something” carries risks of its own – if you report the wrong person, you could end up smeared as a “hater.”)

“Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was ‘not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing,’” the report continued. Despite that, his home is now a “gun free zone” and that has been publicized by the media. He has, in fact, willingly ceded those rights, and by his own words in order to make authorities “happy.”

Before judging him for that, consider the environment that is New Jersey. Then consider the overwhelming force the state can bring to bear, and its predisposition to using it, especially if it’s to enforce citizen disarmament. It’s easy to anonymously declare “Molon Labe” on the internet. In meatspace, resistance is more effective when the aggressor doesn’t get to dictate the time and place, especially if that place is your home and you have family inside.

Appeasing gun-grabbers, generally couched as “compromise,” is impossible. It’s like throwing a scrap of flesh to a circling pack of jackals and expecting them to be sated and leave you alone — instead of sensing opportunity and fear, and moving in closer.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service