If one is looking to find moderate Islam look no further than the nearest liberal... they often report seeing this rare creature in news print and on television. Just ask a University professor of sociology, preferably one wearing fake native jewelry, and he will point the way to a sea of moderate Muslims. 

One certainly will not find a moderate in Iran or Saudi Arabia.  However, this elusive being is reported to exist in countless network news reports, articles and books, as the liberal media describe the two brands of Islam. One ensconced as the religion of peace and the other brand being the Islamic radical, who is easily Identified by his terrible costume, bloody scimitar, short temper and unshaven profile.

However, as hard as one may try... finding the fabled land of moderate Islam in the East is as elusive as searching for an honest man, just ask Diogenes of Sinope. Perhaps, these moderates can be found in the West but so far none have stepped forward willing to disarm their ill tempered brothers. 

Like all good myths moderate Islam is... more the product of a misguided imagination than reality.  In some cases, the myth of moderate Islam may well be more the product of complicity and denial than a myth.  One certainly will not find a moderate Islam in the Koran or Hadith. However, countless Western journals, books and news articles, report a moderate Islam as the religion of peace... at least while these pundits of the mythology retain their heads on their shoulders.

History certainly can't find a moderate Islam... since its founding in the 6th Century AD Islam has been murdering its neighbors and running about the world recklessly oppressing women and converts who attempt to live as moderates.  Perhaps, one of our liberal friends will tell us where this elusive brand of Islam exists.

Views: 568

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The moderate Islamist is Obama! And you all know he's a lier from day one!

  and the koran allows him to lie in defense of Islam. 

Well written, thank you.

   I just found out that CAIR has a building full of lobbyists with a key to the white house. while the Moderate MuSLIMes keep their mouths shut out of fear or waiting to jump into the blood letting.

Every Muslim reads from the same Koran, so you either are an active radical or a passive radical. Nothing moderate in the Koran.

The moderate Muslim is quite because his life is in danger... should he speak up too declare moderation he may well find his head on the chopping block as an apostate. The tenants of Islam require the true Muslim too slay those who are not devoted to keeping Sharia and the Koran.

So the radical minority rules the entire Islam. The Muslim moderate "sheep" will watch the persecution of Jews and Christians and say nothing. The Jesuits would call this "The Sin of Omission". The silent Muslim is a danger to the non-Muslims of the world. Sheep of any stripe are a dangerous element within any group, be it TEA Party or Islam.

You are quite right Colonel.  Sir thank you for your service and for your familys' service as well.

The only ones who don't want to kill everyone, are the ones who are in the ground.

One would find a Moderate Islamist when they are in their grave.

Well said.  Am sick and tired of all of the clap trap about "moderate muslims" ............tell it like it is.

That is like saying, moderate NAZI.




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service