What should be the response by the Tea Party, Conservatives and Patriots if the Liberal Left assassinates President Trump? 

Roger Stone and Dr. Jerome Corsi join Alex Jones live via Skype to dissect the propaganda being put out by the MSM and how they seem to be pushing the public into a accepting Presidential assassination.

Views: 466

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The Speaker is 3rd in line.


Can you explain to me how what davidfarrar  stated makes any sense?



Sally,   I would ask David for more explanation, I cannot speak for him.

Oh! my friends, my friends, forgive me.

What is your question?

If Ryan takes Pres. Trump's place, we, his 60 million voters, will let it be known, with Pres. Trump's leadership, we will primary every House Rep and Senator up for reelection in 2018. And keep doing this until Pres. Trump's chosen presidential candidate for the 2020 general election wins the presidency.

 All it would take is leadership and an organization.

sounds like you want to form a new party, which I tend to agree is probably necessary to achieve restoring the constitution. A significant part of the appeal being that R party has demonstrated over and over and over again it will always be no better than 'the lesser evil'. It's the role it wants and insists on, won't have it any other way. It would be easier, more logical and more productive to finally realize that a start a long overdue party that doesn't keep the conservative base restricted to the attic like a crazy uncle.

problem is -- the election rules/laws are under control of D+R party, and they readily change them to meet their needs. Perot tried what you're suggesting and by the second election of Reform Party's existence the changed election rules sucked the life out of it. D+R Uniparty prevailed yet again over the well financed Reform Party pretty easily by simply having control of the election rule/law making entity.

There's also the factor that a whole bunch of R voters who voted for Trump are diehard blind loyal to the R brand, would vote for Hillary or Obie if they wore the R. (They've been rotting this country for decades, but proudly claim it's at a slower pace than if a D was elected <-- which is VERY arguable)

Something must tear down this Uniparty monopoly, it's not likely to happen within the election process though. Uniparty makes the rules.

Believe me, Pres. Trump, with his 60 million-member power-base, there is no need to do anything as crude as creating a third-party. We can simply take over the GOP from within.

lol --  the idea that diminished TeaParty to a mere faction of only one political party. Voluntarily limiting itself to the attic.

sorry david. R party is what it has always been since inception. It won't ever accept being more. Every 'limit the size of federal government' movement from within has been squashed within 10 years - many much faster than that. They'll throw their own under the bus before allowing itself to become a limited federal government party. They've done it 3 times within our lifetimes (could be 4 very soon, they're trying)... Goldwater, Nixon (I've just recently realized) and Perot. Reagan served his 2 terms but GHWB (the guy the party wanted instead of Reagan) erased the gains and returned the party to what it wants to be in only one term..

Can you believe some of these morons commenting on Steve Scalise are blaming Trump because he wants to reduce the size of government?   They think that's a BAD thing????????  How the hell are we supposed to fight that kind of STUPID?


How the hell are we supposed to fight that kind of STUPID?

(if I coulda i'da removed his 1st example - just in case it's too far for a public forum ;~)

Image result for fix stupid

(that's what we are doing) hehehehe!

The question was:  What if Trump were assassinated, not "replaced".  How's he going to be up for re-election if he's dead?




Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by Jerry Holbert


OMG!! -> Government Now Wants To Seize Your Car For Going 5MPH Over The Limit

We’ve discussed this on and off for several years now. Civil asset forfeiture is a legal process that allows the government to seize assets and cash from citizens without any due process or judicial oversight.

You don’t even have to be charged with a crime. You are assumed guilty unless you can somehow prove your innocence.

Of course, not everyone has this ability… if you aren’t local, state, or federal law enforcement, this is called stealing, and you go to prison.

But the government is actually a bigger problem than common thieves.

A 2015 report showed that law enforcement used civil asset forfeiture to steal more from US residents than every thief, robber, and burglar in America combined.

About $4.5 BILLION worth of cash, cars, homes, and other property is taken by civil asset forfeiture each year – hundreds of millions more than common criminals steal.

And it happens at every level. Your local cop can use civil asset forfeiture just like your state trooper. And then any one of the armed agents of the US government—from the FBI to the Fish and Wildlife Service—can rob you for whatever reason they want.

This travesty continues to grow because the cops who take your stuff get to keep it. Police departments and government agencies around the country depend on civil asset forfeiture to boost their budgets.

Cops will literally keep some of the cars they take as squad cars. And they make a fortune auctioning off the houses, boats, and anything else they confiscate.

Obviously this gives cops an incentive to steal, whether or not they actually think the property was used in a crime, or acquired illegally. Remember, civil asset forfeiture adds billions every year to their bottom line.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case of civil asset forfeiture.

Tyson Timbs was convicted of selling a small amount of drugs to an undercover police officer. He was sentenced to house arrest, and paid about $1,200 in fines.

But then police used civil asset forfeiture to take his $42,000 Land Rover which Timbs purchased with money from a life insurance policy after his father died. The money did not come from selling drugs, or any other illegal activity.

Timbs sued, and the case made its way to the Supreme Court, because every lower court in Indiana said the forfeiture was perfectly legit.

The case revolves around whether or not the seizure of the Land Rover was an excessive fine under the 8th amendment, and whether or not this protection against excessive fines applies to state governments.

And the public got some crazy insight into the government’s position.

The Indiana Solicitor General was arguing in favor of civil asset forfeiture when Justice Stephen Breyer asked him a hypothetical.

Breyer asked, if a state needs revenue, could it force someone to forfeit their Bugatti, Mercedes, or Ferrari for speeding? Even if they were going just 5 miles per hour over the speed limit?

And the utterly appalling answer from the Indiana Solicitor General was, yes.

That’s right… the official government position is that they can steal any amount of your property in “connection” with any crime whatsoever, no matter how trivial the crime may be… even exceeding the speed limit by 5 miles per hour.

This is how overbearing and authoritarian the government has become in the land of the free.

This is how much power your local cop has… and the power only grows as you go to state, and federal officials.

If there is any solace in any of this, it is that the other Supreme Court Justices were reportedly laughing at this exchange.

The justices seemed incredulous that Indiana’s top lawyer was using such absurd assertions and flimsy reasoning in his arguments.

So, for now, we can keep our cars if we get pulled over for speeding. But that may not always be the case…

Depending on how this is ruled, it could pave the way for even more egregious abuses of power… or it could curb the practice, and reign in these thieves in uniforms.

Just understand where the government is coming from. These politicians, bureaucrats and officers think they can do whatever they want. Absolutely anything goes, with no limitation whatsoever.

And that makes it a little tough to feel like you really live in the land of the free.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service