If you research a little about President Obama, you find that he has been devoted to the Marxist ideal of income redistribution from his early years. His public rhetoric has changed to get people on his side, but his actions are much closer aligned to his Marxist training and upbringing. See this link: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2370500/posts excerpt below:
Back in 1982, when Barack Obama was at Columbia University, he wrote a thesis called “Aristocracy Reborn,” the first ten pages of which — and only the first ten pages of which — Joe Klein, of Time magazine, was permitted to see.
Here’s a passage from “Aristocracy Reborn”:
"… the Constitution allows for many things, but what it does not allow is the most revealing. The so-called Founders did not allow for economic freedom. While political freedom is supposedly a cornerstone of the document, the distribution of wealth is not even mentioned. While many believed that the new Constitution gave them liberty, it instead fitted them with the shackles of hypocrisy."
You would perhaps expect this pablum from a postmodernistic Ivy League undergraduate up to his gills in multiculturalism and (as he says on page 100 of his autobiography) “Marxist Professors, structural feminists, and punk-rock performance poets.”
Here, however, is Barack Obama twenty years later, in 2001:
"The Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society…. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution … that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf, and that hasn’t shifted, and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was, um, because the civil rights movement became so court-focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change…. I’m not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through courts… The Constitution reflected an enormous blind spot in this culture that carries on until this day … The Framers had that same blind spot … the fundamental flaw of this country."
If that latter quote sounds eerily similar to the former, it’s because it is eerily similar. Both are the words of a man who, by his own admission, regards America’s foundational premise as fundamentally flawed.
Now see what our Founding Fathers INTENDED for the Constitution to be:
"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite."
-- James Madison (1751-1836), Father of the Constitution for the USA, 4th US President
Source: The Federalist No. 45
That, friends, is the fundamental difference between Barack Obama and our founding fathers. Barack Obama's ideology requires the STATE/FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS to control you, to redistribute your wealth as THEY see fit. To permit you only so much liberty as they deem necessary to keep you working and producing for their utopia.
Yes, many intelligent, compassionate, well meaning Americans have fallen for his rhetoric about hope and change. They've fallen for his class warfare and envy of those more prosperous. Yes, they voted for him and he is the President.
Now, notice in his comments above how he doesn't see our legal system as being sufficient to move us into his Marxist utopia. Now, if you read up on Cloward and Piven http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloward%E2%80%93Piven_strategy (two Marxist Professors at Columbia University while Obama supposedly attended) you can better understand how he and his administration are breaking the backs of the taxpayers through government handouts that will eventually break down our economy. Or this article: Obama Personifies Cloward-Piven Strategy
Folks, this may have seemed far fetched a few years ago, but now he has a record that he cannot hide.
By his own admission, he doesn't like or agree with our constitution.
By his own admission he doesn't believe the legal system will bring about his ideal of social justice.
By his own admission he wants to redistribute wealth.
His current actions regarding the implementation of the sequester, which was his idea, has been to act out the part of the petulant child. He is trying to make everyday life hard on Americans so they will punish the republicans and give him a majority in the House after the 2014 elections. God help us if he is unrestrained! If you think pushing through a 2000 page document that became "Obamacare" without even reading it was ludicrous, wait until they have the votes to pass whatever he wants in the dead of night.
There doesn't seem to be that much concern in the mainstream media. Just because they aren't reporting these things doesn't mean they aren't true. It is amazing, and shameful, that our media is complicit in this deception. Everything from "Fast and Furious", to "Benghazi" and the subsequent lies and coverup, to a myriad of other deceits far worse than anything President Nixon ever did and was run out of office for.
We have to stay involved. We have to demand our state legislatures enact laws to prevent the Federal government from stripping what little power they still have. We have to demand our elected representatives represent us; not their political parties and their power broker friends.
You see, Mr. President, our Constitution INTENTIONALLY limits the Federal and State governments because our founders knew government could not be trusted. Government bureaucracies are made of humans and humans are flawed. The lure of power corrupts even good men. When you combine a narcissistic powerful person with and ideology he feels he needs to implement, then we are going to have big problems.
And that's where we are today.