What do you think about the rich, blowhard running for President?

Do you think she'll win?

Views: 1547

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

NO! Even average DEM voters can't stomach her.

I'm more concerned about the GOP est. undermining a real conservative's chances to win in 2016.

Me to, Frank !!!!

The Republicans are just showing how much they think about the AMERICAN PUBLIC making their OWN CHOICE about WHO they want to lead them !!!! the GOP are as POWER HUNGRY and CORRUPT as the Democrats are. But BOTH Party's know that with TRUMP as PRESIDENT they will LOSE The ability to "FLEECE" the American PEOPLE and to divide the US Treasury amongst themselves.

This is WHY it is IMPORTANT to work HARDER to get TRUMP in as POTUS!!!!

I HOPE AND PRAY THAT she goes down on all of the crimes that they have committed!

I hope not she is a liar and should go to jail

I don't think we need a rich blow hard in the race.  We can live without the Trumpet, but what would the Democrats do without Billary.


I take it you do not like Trump ? So, who would YOU pick for president?

He's "all in" for Cruz, the former Canadian citizen.

You mean the guy who was born a natural born citizen and but held dual citizenship? What about Sen. McCain? He held dual citizenship as Panama claimed him because he was born in Panama.

Nope.  Dual citizenship/allegiance is exactly what The Framers were trying to eliminate from the presidency when they included the "natural born" description of the type of citizen who could hole the office.  Note that they used the term "citizen" for the requirements for all other offices; even the vice president, due to an oversight, was not required to be "natural born" until the Twelfth Amendment passed.

If they had known about where we would be today, with a "living" Cosntitution, they would have added, "...anyone born with dual citizenship is not to be considered 'natural born'."  It didn't occur to them that people would vote against the country's best interests.

They didn't, and they didn't.  The intent was to measure the man's heart. 

For the PIAPS HillBeast it's the big house not the White House!

Exactly...like in 2008 & 2012.  I wish we find away to stop that this time! 




Political Cartoons by Tom StiglichPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Joe Biden On Violence Against Women:   We Have To Keep ‘Punching At It, And Punching At It, And Punching At It’

 The audience laughed as he said this.

Former Vice President Joe Biden said that America needs to be “punching” back to combat violence against women during Wednesday’s Democratic debate.

Biden was asked if he would tackle specific issues regarding the #MeToo movement at the beginning of his presidency, if he were to be elected. The former vice president previously sponsored the 1994 Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), which aimed to protect victims of domestic violence.

The presidential candidate responded to the question about assaulting women by using the phrase “punching” repeatedly, apparently not thinking about the implications of using such a word.

“No man has a right to raise a hand to a woman in anger other than in self-defense, and that rarely ever occurs,” Biden said. “So we have to just change the culture, period, and keep punching at it and punching at it and punching at it. No, I really mean it.”

A few people laughed in the audience as he said this.

Biden added that it is important to pass the Violence Against Women Act, which has passed in the House and held up in the Senate. The former Vice President also suggested that America has to “fundamentally change the culture” of how women are treated, noting that it is “everyone’s responsibility.”

“It’s a gigantic issue, and we have to make it clear from the top, from the president on down that we will not tolerate it,” Biden said. “We will not tolerate this culture.”

Tucker's big takeaways from the Trump impeachment saga

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service