What do you think about the rich, blowhard running for President?

Do you think she'll win?

Views: 1541

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

NO! Even average DEM voters can't stomach her.

I'm more concerned about the GOP est. undermining a real conservative's chances to win in 2016.

Me to, Frank !!!!

The Republicans are just showing how much they think about the AMERICAN PUBLIC making their OWN CHOICE about WHO they want to lead them !!!! the GOP are as POWER HUNGRY and CORRUPT as the Democrats are. But BOTH Party's know that with TRUMP as PRESIDENT they will LOSE The ability to "FLEECE" the American PEOPLE and to divide the US Treasury amongst themselves.

This is WHY it is IMPORTANT to work HARDER to get TRUMP in as POTUS!!!!

I HOPE AND PRAY THAT she goes down on all of the crimes that they have committed!

I hope not she is a liar and should go to jail

I don't think we need a rich blow hard in the race.  We can live without the Trumpet, but what would the Democrats do without Billary.

Clifton,

I take it you do not like Trump ? So, who would YOU pick for president?

He's "all in" for Cruz, the former Canadian citizen.

You mean the guy who was born a natural born citizen and but held dual citizenship? What about Sen. McCain? He held dual citizenship as Panama claimed him because he was born in Panama.

Nope.  Dual citizenship/allegiance is exactly what The Framers were trying to eliminate from the presidency when they included the "natural born" description of the type of citizen who could hole the office.  Note that they used the term "citizen" for the requirements for all other offices; even the vice president, due to an oversight, was not required to be "natural born" until the Twelfth Amendment passed.

If they had known about where we would be today, with a "living" Cosntitution, they would have added, "...anyone born with dual citizenship is not to be considered 'natural born'."  It didn't occur to them that people would vote against the country's best interests.

They didn't, and they didn't.  The intent was to measure the man's heart. 

For the PIAPS HillBeast it's the big house not the White House!

Exactly...like in 2008 & 2012.  I wish we find away to stop that this time! 

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Chip BokPolitical Cartoons by Steve Kelley

ALERT ALERT

The Fall Of Fake News!! Quiet Shake-Up At MSNBC After Station Hemorrhages Viewers Following Mueller Debacle 

Reports are surfacing about a quiet shake-up of personnel at MSNBC after the cable news station lost more than 30% of their audience after the Mueller debacle.

Apparently MNSBC doesn’t think their financial woes are newsworthy given that they didn’t run any breathless stories about their own failings.

News of MSNBC’s collapse can’t come as a surprise to insiders who undoubtedly are fully aware that their audience no longer trusts them.

One source familiar told Mediaite the changes came amidst mounting complaints from NBC News chief Andy Lack about a dip in MSNBC’s ratings following the end of the Mueller investigation. In May, ratings for the network in the advertiser coveted 25-54 demo were down 32% year over year.

MSNBC viewers were asked: How much do you agree that MSNBC regularly reports made up or fake news about Donald Trump and his administration?

The responses were devastating! While 35% or respondents agree that MSNBC pushes Fake News, only 24% disagreed. That’s a ratings death sentence!

What do you expect from a channel that boasts disgraced liar, Brian Williams, and race pimp, Al Sharpton?

Bright Start News@BRIGHTstrt
 

MAJOR SHAKEUP AT MSNBC - Ratings crater after Mueller Report Debacle! 

MSNBC Shakeup: Jonathan Wald and Dan Arnall Take Dayside

MSNBC quietly implemented a sweeping shakeup in programming this week, Mediaite has learned, appointing SVP of programming and development Jonathan Wald and MSNBC executive editor Dan Arnall to lead...

Flashback: MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow’s Ratings Plummet To Yearly Low

MSNBC primetime host Rachel Maddow brought in her worst weekly ratings of the year last week.

Her show last week averaged 2,324,000 viewers, with an average audience of 337,000 in the 25-54 age demographic, both of which mark yearly lows for the liberal television host, according to Nielsen Media Research.

Maddow first saw a dramatic drop in ratings following the conclusion of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation. Her previous low for a week in 2019 was the last week in March, the first full week after Mueller submitted his conclusion to Attorney General William Barr, where she averaged 2,458,000 viewers with 392,000 in the demo.

She spent two years dissecting every aspect of the special counsel’s investigation into whether President Donald Trump conspired with the Russians to win the 2016 presidential election. The night Mueller submitted his findings to Barr, Maddow appeared to hold back tears over the fact that neither the president nor any family members were indicted.

Compared to Maddow’s low ratings last week, Fox News’ Sean Hannity, whose program is often the most-watched among all cable news shows, averaged 3,108,000 viewers with just under half-a-million viewers in the key demographic.

She also nearly tripled CNN’s Chris Cuomo’s weekly ratings. His program only had 880,000 viewers with 225,000 in the key demo.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service