Unbelievable! Obama Admin Source Confirms Wiretapping Was Conducted

Views: 1146

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

So many stories with obama denying everything.  He has never told the truth about anything.  His reign of terror is over, so GO AWAY, OBAMA.

So many stories with obama denying everything.  He has never told the truth about anything.  His reign of terror is over, so GO AWAY, OBAMA.

Rivera intimated that a judge would not issue a warrant unless the evidence was overwhelming. Says who??? 0bama's implants in the justice department would do anything to advance the dem leftist cause, including shady and questionable warrants.

Trump always shows plenty of evidence and always cites his sources when he makes a statement. He is the most transparent president ever. He needs to start working on locking Obama up. It's no longer just "lock her up". While he is at it he needs to lock up all unlawful opposition and dissent including the opposition and dissent coming from the judiciary and the legislative. That's what's needed to give Trump total control over the USA just like any CEO has total control over a company. Having total control allows Trump to make the Trump Organization great, and that's how he makes the US great. We the people need Trump to reign supreme over the US just like he reigns supreme over the Trump Organization.

Was done under the disguise of Russian Hacking of the DNC of course a judge is going to give a warrant for that and because the liberal judge is for Obama and not We The People

The warrant was issued in Sept. 2016 Hacking took place in March or April 2016

Russia did not hack the DNC  - - was an employee of the DNC arranged by Obama and Hillary to set President Trump up in case he did win the election Which HE DID BIG TIME!!!

Now Obama, Hillary, Soros are making sure that We The People get the message loud and clear that The United States and We The People of a Constitutional Republic are thru - done with - finished - are no more -

You don't get a warrant to tap Trump's campaign HQ., based on suspicions ... No hard evidence, no probable cause... no basis for the request.  A suspected threat, that Trump, maybe working with the Russian's to hack the DNC is BS...

It appears from other reports that the Obama Administration... not the (FEC) Federal Election Commission, directly interfered with the US presidential elections, by shopping for a FISA Judge who would issue a wire tap warrant...Shopping, because it has been reported that the first FISA  Judge they turned down the Administrations request. Interference with an election by a sitting government official or agency is illegal... Hatch Act.

The Hatch Act of 1939, officially An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities, is a United States federal law whose main provision prohibits employees in the executive branch of the federal government, except the president, vice-president, and certain designated high-level officials of that branch, from engaging in some forms of political activity.

It is also worth pointing out that Obama violated the provisions of the Hatch Act by being a Democrat, and in fact every single member of the current Progressive Liberal Democrat Party who draws a Federal Paycheck is in violation of it.

My opinion, of course. And my opinion would be struck down by every court in the country. Why? Because it is based on a simple reading of one of the provisions, rather than a lawyerly dodge and weave approach that would rule that the Act is a tax.

 The provision states that no Federal Employee can be a member of any organization that serves to overthrow our Constitutional Form of Government. Not a direct quote, but damn close.

Last time I checked, the DNC was engaged in that precise endeavor. Obama even bragged about "transforming" America. His entire presidency and administration was illegal and flaunted the Constitution.

But, some lawyer would say elected officials are not employees. They are public servants. They receive remuneration for their services only by law, and not by an employer. 

Go ahead and puke. I am puked out.

He did.  Mark Styne has the time line and all the details.  It is amazing.

Someone should tell
Schumer, he has no clue

"According to Law" - - HA- - there are many things a president is not allowed to do; well, that never stopped zero before, now, did it??

The President can order a wire tap... without a FISA court Judge approving... See:

In Chapter 36 of Title 50 of the US Code *War and National Defense", S..., we read the following:

(1) Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath that—

(A) the electronic surveillance is solely directed at—
(i) the acquisition of the contents of communications transmitted by means of communications used exclusively between or among foreign powers, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title; or
(ii) the acquisition of technical intelligence, other than the spoken communications of individuals, from property or premises under the open and exclusive control of a foreign power, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title;

(B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party; and

(C) the proposed minimization procedures with respect to such surveillance meet the definition of minimization procedures under section 1801(h) of this title; and
if the Attorney General reports such minimization procedures and any changes thereto to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence at least thirty days prior to their effective date, unless the Attorney General determines immediate action is required and notifies the committees immediately of such minimization procedures and the reason for their becoming effective immediately.

While (B) seems to contradict the underlying permissive nature of Section 1802 as it involves a United States person, what the Snowden affair has demonstrated all too clearly, is how frequently the NSA and FISA court would make US citizens collateral damage. To be sure, many pointed out the fact that Fox News correspondent James Rosen was notoriously wiretapped in 2013 when the DOJ was investigating government leaks. The Associated Press was also infamously wiretapped in relation to the same investigation

It appears that Pres. Obama may have ordered the wire-tap... using the above authority... albeit it would have been improperly cited as it doesn't apply to the situation involving Donald Trump and his campaign.  What we have here are criminals looking to twist the law too their advantage ... arguing improperly doesn't however make their use of the law LAWFUL.




Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco


OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.


© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service