UN to Trump: Don’t You Dare Cut Our Funding!

Last week, President Trump fulfilled another campaign promise. He cut off funding to the United Nations Population Fund (UNPF). Back in January, Trump signed an executive order reinstating the “Mexico City Policy.” This prohibited US funds from going to international organizations that provide abortions, such as the UNPF.

He is making good on his promises and defunding the UN where he can. Trump has asked Congress to give him permission to make more cuts.

The United Nations is pushing back. They are demanding that Trump cease and desist all defunding efforts. They have even resorted to pressuring Trump’s own advisors to make him stop pulling funding from the UN.

On that last effort, it actually might be working.

The President’s top advisors were supposed to meet yesterday to discuss the future of the United Nations Climate Change Treaty. That meeting was abruptly cancelled.

White House Conservatives are pressuring the President to keep his promises. Donald Trump swore to voters that he would pull out of the international climate change treaty and he should absolutely do that.

The Establishment wing of the White House, however, is trying to convince Trump to go back on his word and keep the United States in this horrible treaty. Not only that, but they are trying to force President Trump to continue making payments into the program.

No.

Don’t let the United States force the US to fund Obama’s climate treaty! Send your FaxBlast to Congress and DEMAND that they defund the United Nations and its Climate Change Treaty!

This is our fight.

We fought tooth and nail to put a stop to Obama’s lawlessness.

President Trump has dismantled Barack Obama’s unconstitutional climate executive orders. He has begun defunding the United Nations.

Now that it is time to pull out of the treaty all together, the UN is fighting back. They are pressuring the less-Conservative members of the Trump administration – such as Jared Kushner – and they are in-turn pressuring the President to back away from his oath.

Enough is enough.

Congressional leadership swore that if Americans elected a Republican President, they would begin dismantling Barack Obama’s unconstitutional executive actions.

It is time to call-in that promise.

Congress never ratified the treaty, they never approved Obama’s climate executive orders, and they certainly didn’t appropriate any taxpayer money to the program.

Congress is just days away from voting on next years budget.

It is up to YOU to demand that Congress defund the United Nations and its Climate Treaty. If you don’t demand it, Congress won’t include the language in the bill.

This is our moment. This is our chance to finish a fight that is years in the making. You have the opportunity, right now, to draw your line in the sand and demand that Congress take real action against the United Nations and its globalist agenda!

We can do this! Send your FaxBlast to Congress and DEMAND they add an amendment to defund the UN and its Climate Treaty in this month’s budget bill!

Conservative Daily

https://conservative-daily.com/2017/04/19/un-trump-dont-dare-cut-fu...

Views: 87

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Paris 2015 UN Climate Agreement

Still Alive: Trump Policy Advisors To Debate U.S. Role In Paris Climate Accord

Trump’s unwavering campaign promise to withdraw the U.S. from the UN’s Paris Climate agreement is faltering as the climate change crowd piles on. The odds are rapidly shrinking that Trump will mount a serious resistance.  TN Editor

President Trump’s divided policy advisers will meet Tuesday afternoon to hash over whether Mr. Trump should withdraw the United States from the landmark Paris climate accord of 2015, and the side pressing the president to remain in the deal enters the pivotal meeting with the upper hand.

Mr. Trump plans to make a final decision on the fate of the Paris agreement before a meeting of the Group of 7 leading economies at the end of May, according to Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary.

On the campaign trail, Mr. Trump vowed to “cancel” the climate deal, and his most politically conservative advisers, including his senior strategist Stephen K. Bannon, have pushed him to follow through. But Mr. Bannon’s influence has waned in recent weeks, while authority has risen for Mr. Trump’s daughter Ivanka and son-in-law, Jared Kushner, who advocate staying in the accord.

Secretary of State Rex W. Tillerson, the former chief executive of Exxon Mobil, has also spoken in favor of “keeping a seat at the table” in the climate pact, and in recent days, major corporations have stepped forward to embrace that position.

While no decision has been made, experts tracking it say that view is gaining traction.

“We do not currently believe the Trump administration plans to withdraw from either Paris agreement,” wrote Kevin Book, an analyst at ClearView Energy Partners, a Washington firm, in a memo to clients on Monday.

While Mr. Trump does not have the power to undo a multilateral United Nations accord, he could withdraw the world’s largest economy from the pact, weakening it substantially. Such a move would win cheers from the nation’s most powerful conservative political advocates, and give Mr. Trump bragging rights in coal country.

But withdrawing from the landmark accord that committed nearly every nation to take action against planet-warming emissions could create diplomatic blowback, while weakening American leadership in arenas far afield from energy and the environment.

Besides, keeping the United States’ name on the accord does not obligate the Trump administration to abide by the ambitious emissions-control pledges of Mr. Trump’s predecessor, Barack Obama. At least one senior White House climate policy adviser, George David Banks, has advocated staying in the agreement while replacing the Obama plan with a weaker, more industry-friendly pledge.

Over recent weeks, Mr. Banks has asked top officials at several major corporations, including Exxon Mobil, who have similar views, to submit letters to the White House confirming their support of staying in the Paris deal, even if in a modified form.

Read full story here…

https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2017/04/18/still-alive-trump...

Trump Sparks Worry of Paris Agreement Reversal

Despite campaign pledge, president weighs keeping Obama's legacy climate change deal

by Jim Stinson | Updated 19 Apr 2017 at 1:15 PM

President Donald Trump, having already backtracked on several campaign pledges considered important to his populist-conservative base, sparked worry Tuesday he may decline to withdraw from an Obama-era climate change agreement.

On the campaign trail the president promised to pull-out of the Paris Accord of 2015, the international climate agreement former President Barack Obama touted as a signature legacy item.

“As Scott Pruitt said, the accord is a bad deal for the U.S. that will cost trillions each year to avert warming by 0.1 degrees by 2100.”

The New York Times reported on Tuesday that staying in the agreement “would break one of [Trump’s] signature campaign promises.”

“Staying in the legally non-binding accord would be an abject betrayal to his supporters,” said Thomas Richard of Climate Change Dispatch, in an email to LifeZette.

Richard noted that the accord is the kind of abusive agreement Trump used to bash as a “bad deal.”

“China and India do not have to reduce emissions until 2030, and only if they decide it’s in their best interests,” said Richard. “They also aren’t required to add money to the U.N.’s green climate fund. As Scott Pruitt said, the accord is a bad deal for the U.S. that will cost trillions each year to avert warming by 0.1 degrees by 2100.”

As recently as last week Trump’s EPA administrator, Scott Pruitt, was advocating a U.S. exit from the bargain.

“Paris is something that we need to really look at closely,” Pruitt told Fox News. “It’s something we need to exit, in my opinion.”

Conservative groups who oppose the accord include the Heritage Foundation, which helped Trump organize his transition, and Americans for Prosperity, the nation’s largest grassroots conservative organization.

But Trump is under pressure from moderate advisers to reconsider ahead of a late-May meeting of the G7. Trump would be expected to take grief from France and Canada were he to pull out of the Paris Accord.

The moderates in the White House have reportedly warned Trump pulling out of the agreement could damage the credibility of the United States — ostensibly with left-leaning European and Canadian politicians.

Yet Trump didn't care too much about what world leaders would think of him during the campaign. He took relish in promising to "cancel" the agreement. The promise to exit was a key component of Trump's pitch to coal miners in West Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and other crucial states that delivered him victory.

https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/trump-waffling-paris-accord/

 United Nations Population Fund (UNPF), and thats all he did, no he did not complete his campaign promise.

Trump Leaving UN-NWO with HR193 American Sovereignty Restoration Act 2017

https://geopolitics.co/2017/01/26/trump-leaving-un-nwo-with-america...

H.R.193 - American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/193

Donald Trump's American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017- YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUUCvwEbMXk

 

Published on Feb 14, 2017

The Petition link is below & The why, the system is against Donald Trump, this does not have one thing to do with a Ban On Muslims, or Mexico, this one act by Donald Trump," American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017" does have the British Empire Upset.

Days after Trump's inauguration, members of Congress are seizing the moment and pushing for America to exit the United Nations, introducing a bill to the House that will repeal the United Nations Participation Act of 1945 and Reclaim Full American Sovereignty.
American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017:https://www.google.com/search?q=American+Sovereignty+Restoration+Ac...

American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017- Care2 Petition: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/854/706/259/

Thanks for posting. We need to keep reminding him!

 

DROP DEAD, UNITED NATIONS--and MOVE OUT!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Tom StiglichPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Fact Check:   'Joe Biden Claims ‘We Didn’t Lock People Up In Cages’

CLAIM: Former Vice President Joe Biden claimed, on immigration: “We didn’t lock people up in cages.”

VERDICT: FALSE. The “cages” were built by the Obama-Biden administration.

Univision moderator Jorge Ramos asked Biden at the third Democrat debate at Texas Southern University in Houston, Texas, why Latinos should trust him after the Obama administration continued deporting “undocumented immigrants.”

Biden claimed that the Obama administration’s policies were more humane than those of President Donald Trump: “We didn’t lock people up in cages,” he said.

In fact, the “cages” were built by the Obama administration to deal with a surge of unaccompanied minors who crossed the border illegally in 2014.

Originally, the Obama administration was “warehousing” children — literally — in overwhelmed Border Patrol facilities. Breitbart News broke the story of the surge, which was partly triggered by Obama’s policy of allowing illegal alien children who entered the country as minors to stay in the country (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA).

Above image credit: AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin, Pool, File

The above photo was published by the Associated Press in June 2014, and the photo below is of Obama’s Secretary of Homeland Security, Jeh Johnson, touring a Border Patrol facility with “cages.”


Above: Border Patrol officers escort Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and Gov. Jan Brewer through the department’s Nogales processing facility for immigrant children. (Photo courtesy Barry Bahler/Department of Homeland Security)

The “cages” are chain-link enclosures in Border Patrol processing facilities that are meant to protect children from adults in custody. They are not permanent accommodations.

In mid-2018, as the Trump administration began enforcing a “zero tolerance” policy that stopped the “catch-and-release” policy of letting illegal aliens go after they were arrested. Detaining adults and children meant that children had to be processed separately; the enclosures prevented adults from harming children.

As Breitbart News reported at the time, children were not housed in “cages.” They were processed and then taken to shelters, where they were given medical care, toiletries, education, recreation, and counseling, and where staff attempted to find relatives or sponsors to whom they could be released.

Democrats began tweeting images of “kids in cages” to condemn the Trump administration. Journalists, too, shared those images.

One problem: they were taken during the Obama administration.

Public outrage at the images led President Trump to end the policy, and require families to be detained together.

Democrats keep repeating the mistake, however: in July, they had to delete a tweet that used an image from the Obama era and cited the “inhumane treatment” of children by the Trump administration.

Republicans argue that not detaining illegal aliens is actually the cruel policy, because it encourages migrants to undertake a dangerous journey, often guided by cartels and smugglers.

As Breitbart News’ Alana Mastrangelo noted recently:

But what’s worse than “cages,” however, are reports of migrant children also being handed over to human traffickers during the Obama administration — while Biden was vice president — according to the New York Times. Between October 2013 and July 2015 alone, nearly 80,000 unaccompanied children from Central American countries were detained by U.S. authorities.

It remains unclear how many of the tens of thousands of children were handed over to human traffickers — including sex traffickers — during that span of nearly two years, as those cases are reportedly not tracked.

“Others were ransomed by the very smugglers to whom their families paid thousands of dollars to sneak them into the United States,” reported the New York Times in 2015, during Obama’s presidency and Biden’s vice presidency. “Some lost limbs during the journey or found themselves sold into sexual slavery.”

Biden told voters in South Carolina last month that he would close all border detention facilities, guaranteeing that the migrant flow would continue.

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service