I wanted to share the following recent article with you because it revealed that the UN’s Kangaroo Court threatened to prosecute some of our U.S. Troops on trumpeted up charges-What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide: 
UN Kangaroo Court Implodes Amid Threat to Prosecute U.S. Troops!-Posted on The New American-By Alex Newman-On November 17, 2016:
Even as it threatens to illegally prosecute American soldiers, the dictator-dominated United Nations judicial body known as the “International Criminal Court” is imploding spectacularly on the world stage. With the withdrawal of the Russian government this week and South African authorities last month — not to mention the fact that the U.S. government never joined in the first place — the ICC appears to be on its deathbed. Other African and Asian governments are also preparing to exit the outfit. The establishment and various globalists are outraged, of course. But for humanity and the cause of true justice, the dictatorship-infested ICC's collapse is great news, as anyone familiar with the UN kangaroo court and its operation can attest.
On November 14, the Hague-based ICC, perhaps hoping to make itself appear relevant amid a growing wave of formal withdrawals, issued a threat about potentially prosecuting U.S. troops. “Members of U.S. armed forces appear to have subjected at least 61 detained persons to torture, cruel treatment, outrages upon personal dignity on the territory of Afghanistan between 1 May 2003 and 31 December 2014,” read a “report” issued by ICC's self-styled “chief prosecutor” Fatou Bensouda (shown), a controversial Muslim lawyer from Gambia who served one of the most oppressive dictators in the world before taking the UN ICC post. The threats follow calls for Bush and Obama to be prosecuted for war crimes, too.
The kangaroo court's “chief prosecutor” also claimed that operatives with the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency might have subjected more than two dozen detainees to “torture, cruel treatment, outrages upon personal dignity and/or rape” between December 2002 and March 2008. The alleged crimes took place in Afghanistan, Poland, Romania, and Lithuania, according to the report. Echoing previous rhetoric, ICC “prosecutors” said they would “imminently” decide whether to try and press forward with a full-scale investigation and possible war-crimes charges against U.S. military and intelligence personnel. The court also claims jurisdiction over vague “crimes of aggression.”
Whether the baseless threat to illegally prosecute U.S. forces was an effort to stem the exodus of members from the troubled and widely ridiculed court was not immediately clear. But while the ICC has in the past issued illegitimate threats to prosecute Americans over supposed crimes in places such as Libya, the threats have generally been ignored, because the court has no jurisdiction over Americans. By claiming that the alleged crimes by U.S. troops took place in nations where authorities have signed on to the Rome Statute, which created the court, the ICC now claims it may be able to investigate and prosecute Americans without constitutional protections.
Under normal circumstances, the U.S. government might kindly remind the ICC of its irrelevance and lack of jurisdiction, and that would be the end of the story. After all, American courts and officials are perfectly capable of prosecuting any of the crimes alleged to have been committed — all of which are serious crimes under U.S. law. Instead, though, the Obama administration, even while expressing doubts that U.S. troops would actually be prosecuted, has attempted to legitimize the ICC's usurpation of jurisdiction by taking the threats seriously and treating them as legitimate, despite the fact that such schemes might open him and his top officials up to war-crimes trials.
After the ICC prosecutors' threats against Americans were released, Obama State Department spokesperson Elizabeth Trudeau said the Obama administration did not believe the ICC investigation was “warranted or appropriate.” What the department did not say was what it should have said: The ICC is a rogue body with mass-murdering tyrants as members that has no authority to investigate or prosecute Americans under its pseudo-justice system. Obama might have also reminded the ICC that it includes none of the U.S. Constitution's protections that ordinarily would ensure that suspects' rights, presumption of innocence, and due process are upheld.
The many reasons why Americans should (and do) avoid the ICC like the plague have long been common knowledge among clear-thinking legal experts. The late Dr. Charles Rice, a professor of law at Notre Dame University, called the ICC “a monster” that essentially “repudiates the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence and cancels the 4th of July.” Especially troubling, he said, is that the court acknowledges no boundaries to its supposed authority. “In our system, law is supposed to be a rule of reason which, in a sense, controls the state and compels the state to operate under the law,” Dr. Rice explained. “What are the limits on the ICC? There are none. It's insane!”
But that sort of view of coercive power is widespread in the outgoing Obama administration, which was thoroughly repudiated by voters via the rejection of Hillary Clinton. Indeed, the Obama administration, which has been illegally trying to legitimize the court from the start of..., pretended in its statement that the probe was legitimate. “The United States is deeply committed to complying with the law of war, and we have a robust national system of investigation and accountability that more than meets international standards,” Trudeau added. In reality, Americans and the U.S. government are not legally bound in any way to the dangerous “international standards” of the dictators clubs that are the UN and its kangaroo courts.
But even as Obama seeks to legitimize the pseudo-court's usurpations and attacks against Americans and the U.S. justice system, the ICC is still imploding and becoming a joke. The latest devastating blow to the court came this week, when the Kremlin issued a decree withdrawing from the self-styled court over its alleged bias and politicization of investigations — especially as it relates to Putin's controversial annexation of Crimea. The blow is particularly harmful coming from the Russian government, which was one of the architects of the court and one of its chief boosters for many years, including amid the civil war in Syria.
Continue Reading:
Note: I believe that the following articles and video from the recent past relate to and/or further support the disturbing and/or disgusting information revealed in the above article-You Decide:
Service chiefs warn $1T cut would be ‘catastrophic!’–Posted on The Washington Times-By Rowan Scarborough, The Washington Times-On November 2, 2011:
Armed Services chairman: Obama is anti-military!–Posted on The Washington Times-By Shaun Waterman, The Washington Times-On September 12, 2011:
Obama Strategy Guts U.S. Armed Services!–Posted on WND.com-On July 23, 2011:
The Plot to Destroy the US Military!–Posted on Canada Free Press-By Daniel Greenfield-On March 21, 2011:
Obama’s War Against the U.S. Military!–Posted on Human Events-By Buzz Patterson-On September 10, 2010:
Video: Obama’s Other Communist Mentor!-Posted on Western Journalism-By JOEL VALENZUELA-On August 6, 2012:
Note: The following eye opening article reveals a George Soros funded unincorporated association by the name of “Peace and Security Funders Group (PSFG)”, which was established in 1999 and consists of more than 50 private and public foundations that gave a portion of their $27 billion in combined assets to leftist organizations that undermine the war on terror in several inter-related ways: (a) by characterizing the United States as an evil, militaristic, oppressive nation that exploits vulnerable populations all over the globe; (b) by accusing the U.S. of having provoked, through its unjust policies and actions, the terror attacks against it, and consequently casting those attacks as self-defensive measures taken in response to American transgressions; and (c) by depicting America’s military and legislative actions against terror as unjustified, extreme, and immoral. I believe that the damaging information revealed in this article relates to and/or further supports the disturbing information revealed in the above articles and/or videos-You Decide:
Funding the War Against the War on Terror!–Posted on FrontPageMagazine.com-By: John Perazzo –On October 6, 2006:
http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=2309
Note: The following recent article reveals that Marine Sergeant Dakota Meyer, who received the Medal of Honor for his actions on September 8, 2009, was invited to attend the Marine Corps Ball in Afghanistan with his former unit, Embedded Training Team 2-8, but his invitation was reportedly rescinded at the direction of Amb. P. Michael McKinley over Meyer’s ‘political views.’ On his Facebook page, Meyer has been vocally critical of the Obama administration on a number of issues, including a push for additional gun control laws. What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:
MoH Recipient Uninvited From Marine Ball!-Posted on The Patriot Post-By Harold Hutchison-On November 20, 2016:
https://patriotpost.us/posts/46062
Note: The following recent article gives me terrible flashbacks of serving my country during the Vietnam War where I lost many a friend-You Decide:
Father of fallen soldier says plane passengers booed family!-Posted on FoxNews.com-On November 19, 2016:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/11/19/father-fallen-soldier-says-pla...
Note: The following recent article revealed that the White House Press Secretary recently told some ‘embittered World War II Veterans’ to get over Japanese leader’s Pearl Harbor visit. What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:
White House: Some ‘Embittered’ WWII Vets Will Get Over Japanese Leader’s Pearl Harbor Visit!-Posted on The Daily Caller-By Blake Neff-On December 5, 2016:
http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/05/white-house-embittered-world-war-...
Note: The following recent article revealed that Obama recently left the U.S. Navy without a carrier at sea for 1st time since WWII, as a means of possibly ‘sabotaging Trump and putting America at grave risk at the same time.’ If true-What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:
Obama Leaves U.S. Navy Without Carrier at Sea for 1st Time Since WWII-Posted on Conservative Tribune-On January 3, 2017:
http://conservativetribune.com/obama-makes-drastic-move/?utm_source...
Note: The following recent article reveals that President Obama will step down after eight years as commander in chief with one of the most influential tenures leading the U.S. military, but ‘not necessarily the political support of service members’-You Decide:
The Obama era is over. Here's how the military rates his legacy!-Posted on Military Times-By Leo Shane III and George R. Altman-On January 8, 2017:
http://www.militarytimes.com/articles/obama-legacy-military
Note: The following recent article reveals that post Obama the military is sailing towards strength under President-elect Trump-You Decide:
Post Obama: Sailing Toward Military Strength!-Posted on The Patriot Post-By National Security Desk-On January. 9, 2017:
https://patriotpost.us/posts/46793
Note: The following recent article revealed that Obama never listens to the ‘Military Community’ prior to releasing ‘Traitors’ and ‘Terrorist.’-Why?-You Decide:
Why Won't Obama Listen to the "Military Community" When Freeing Traitors and Terrorists?-Posted on Front Page Magazine-By Daniel Greenfield-On January 19, 2017:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/265518/why-wont-obama-listen-mili...
Note: The following recent article revealed that the Obama minions are saddened at losing power, but that there are tears on the faces of some of the ‘victims’ of Obama’s 'reign of terror', tears of relief-You Decide:
Obama Minions Saddened at Losing Power!-Posted on Front Page Magazine-By Daniel Greenfield-On January 19, 2017:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/265512/obama-minions-saddened-los...
Note: The following video reveals some extremely disturbing information regarding the real outcome of the Vietnam War-You Decide:
Question: Did the United States win or lose the Vietnam War?
Answer: We are taught that it was a resounding loss for America, one that proves that intervening in the affairs of other nations is usually misguided. The truth is that our military won the war, but our politicians lost it. The Communists in North Vietnam actually signed a peace treaty, effectively surrendering. But the U.S. Congress didn't hold up its end of the bargain. In just five minutes, learn the truth about who really lost the Vietnam War:
History: The Truth About The Vietnam War?
https://www.prageru.com/courses/history/truth-about-vietnam-war
Note: I believe that the disturbing and/or disgusting information revealed in the above articles and videos relate to and/or further support my following blogs-You Decide:
Veterans and members of our Armed Forces under attack!
