UK School Tells 6 Year-Old’s To Write Gay Love Letters – To Promote Diversity

 The BBC’s Radio Manchester published a video on their Facebook page detailing the LGBTQ lesson back in September and it shows the 6-year-old’s being told to write gay love letters and marriage proposals.

Summit News reports: The clip features kids from Bewsey Lodge Primary School imagining themselves in the role of Prince Henry, who wants to profess his love for and gay marry his man servant ‘Thomas’.


read more:

Views: 35

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Apparently, the Parents don't care about such crap... If they did they would be demonstrating and demanding the firing of the Teacher and Administration.  If the people are unwilling to demand accountability for such reckless and deviant behavior... then they will suffer the consequences.

 Nope they do care, but people are being threatened, if the voice a opinion against the UN Homo Immigration.

 A evil is before you Nelson, and their wickedness is progressive.

Parents don't care enough to remove their children from the system that supports this crap... period.  If, as you claim, they were being threatened that should evoke an even greater response to hold the teachers and administrators accountable for this garbage... and... and... a massive migration out of and away from the Public Schools.

However, there are no massive protests, not even a small protest... no one is removing their children, and I doubt a lawsuit is even being filed to stop such deviant and immoral conduct by the Public School system.  This type of activity should be treated as child abuse or endangerment. 

 The UK is different then the USA, privet schools cost is much more then in the USA. People who wish to remove their children, some have been threatened.


Your wrong again...

The average cost of private school fees in the UK is £4,541* for day schools, whilst boarding school fees average at £10,317*.  1.33 US Dollars to a Pound equals... 6,395 dollars US... See:

Tuition for private schools in England is well under the tuition for US private primary education... 10,676 dollars tuition for a non-boarding primary private school in the USA.  It is 4,281 dollars less to attend a private school in the UK... that is no small difference.


Your scholarship is horrible... try researching before you make stupid remarks like a private education in the UK is higher than in the US... the UK is thousands of dollars less annually. 4,281 dollars on average less than a US private education.

 In 2017, the average annual cost for private schooling was £14,102 for day school and £32,259 for boarding school.

£32,259 in US currency= 32 GBP to USD = 42.04 USD United States Dollar

Get a refund Ronald on your education.

Now you stoop to outright misrepresentation... the site you provided is for  "Independent Schools" not Private Schools..

There is a big difference.  Some independent schools in the UK include some Public Schools... and the definition excludes Parochial Schools which are historically much less expensive... even free to some low -income students.

Your figures are not for PRIVATE SCHOOLS... pay attention to the definitions provided at your link.  Some PUBLIC SCHOOLS in the UK are considered independent schools and exclude the less expensive Private Parochial (religious/church) Schools when calculating the costs to attend. Oops, figures don't lie but liars... figure.

The sites I provided include ONLY PRIVATE SCHOOLS... See: and See:

The information you site is found in the Wikipedia article on 'Independent Schools'  not PRIVATE SCHOOLS.  LEARN HOW TO READ and take a course in reading comprehension.

The following information in italics taken from the article you linked to in Wikipedia... the article was titled 'Independent school" which are not necessarily Private Schools... some are Public Schools... like magnet or charter schools in the US..  You are in effect quoting costs for PUBLIC SCHOOLS. at:

"United Kingdom
Main article: Independent school (United Kingdom)
In the United Kingdom, independent education (or private education) has grown continually for the past twenty years.

England and Wales
In England and Wales, the more prestigious independent schools are known as "public schools", sometimes subdivided into major and minor public schools.

A common definition of a public school relates to membership of the Headmasters' and Headmistresses' Conference, and this includes many independent grammar schools). The term "public school" originally meant that the school was open to the public (as opposed to private tutors)."

You also include primary and secondary education in the dollar amounts... Grammar School education or primary education by a 'private school' is much less expensive than a secondary education in a 'private school'.

Primary education covers everything from Reception (minimum of age 4) to Year 6 (maximum of age 11). Secondary education covers everything from Year 7 (minimum age of 11) to Year 11 (maximum age of 16).  See:;

Since we were talking about a 6yr old we were discussing costs for a private primary education in the US versus the UK... the US is by far more expensive... by far... more expensive in the US than the UK.

Try comparing apples with apples and oranges with oranges... I'd tell you to get a refund on your education but I don't believe you ever received one.  Try taking a reading comprehension course and spend some time reading what you post before making false comparisons and statements.

My figures are for 2019-2020  they are current cost estimates... in the US By State and National Average.  The conversion from Pounds Sterling to USD is also the current exchange rate.

The UK figures are found in the body of the article posted... one will have to read about halfway down the first page to find the figures... these are UK figures and are present year figures.  See:

For the US tuition figures go to:

A US private PRIMARY EDUCATION is startlingly higher than one in the UK... The US tuition is on average 4,281 dollars higher for the same education in the UK.

P/S Independent Schools are not private schools... they are similar to Charter and Magnet Schools in the US. They are Public Schools with independent financing mostly from public sources.

 Was there a accountability of the income for the middle class and the poor?

Good one Mr. Massingale

According to what I have read the UK private school option allows for tax credits and other government support... much like a voucher program.  

It is time America goes to vouchers for education... let the parents choose where their children are educated... public or private schools.




Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich


Breaking — West Virginia Lawmakers Invite Persecuted Pro-Second Amendment Counties In Virginia To Join Their State

West Virginia lawmakers introduced legislation to invite persecuted pro Second Amendment Counties to join their state.

The West Virginia Senate adopted a resolution to remind Virginia residents from Frederick County that they have a standing invite — from 1862 — to become part of West Virginia.

West Virginia freedom fighters broke away from Virginia Democrat slave owners during the Civil War.

This week West Virginia has once again invited persecuted Virginia pro 2-A counties to come join their state.

Sounds like a winning plan!

Resolution 8 reads as follows:


(By Delegates Howell, Summers, Shott, Householder, C. Martin, Hott, Graves, Cadle, Barnhart, J. Jeffries, Maynard, Phillips, Foster, Hamrick, Steele, D. Jeffries, Wilson, Waxman, Bartlett, Paynter, Linville, Sypolt, Bibby, Hill, Ellington, Higginbotham, J. Kelly, Mandt, Pack, Dean and P. Martin)

[Introduced January 14, 2020]

Providing for an election to be had, pending approval of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and a majority of qualified citizens voting upon the proposition prior to August 1, 2020, for the admission of certain counties and independent cities of the Commonwealth of Virginia to be admitted to the State of West Virginia as constituent counties, under the provisions of Article VI, Section 11 of the Constitution of West Virginia

Whereas, The Legislature of West Virginia finds that in 1863, due to longstanding perceived attitudes of neglect for the interests of the citizens of Western Virginia, and a studied failure to address the differences which had grown between the counties of Western Virginia and the government at Richmond, the Commonwealth of Virginia was irretrievably divided, and the new State of West Virginia was formed; and

Whereas, Such division occurred as the Trans-Allegheny portions of Virginia perceived that they suffered under an inequitable measure of taxation by which they bore a disproportionate share of the tax burden; and

Whereas, That this perception was further compounded by the effects of a scheme of representation by which Trans-Allegheny Virginia was not allowed to have its proper and equitable share of representation in the government at Richmond; and

Whereas, That this arrangement arguably resulted in the tax dollars of Trans-Allegheny Virginia being used to enrich the Tidewater through internal improvements which did not benefit the people of Western Virginia, while the people of the Trans-Allegheny had little to no say in how their tax dollars were allocated; and

Whereas, Though this course led to an irreconcilable division, and the subsequent formation of West Virginia, yet, the longstanding peaceful cooperation between this State and the Commonwealth of Virginia is a sign that such separation, undertaken even under the most challenging and onerous of circumstances, can, with the passage of time, yield lasting results which are beneficial to both sides; and

Whereas, In the intervening years, the same neglect for the interests of many of the remaining counties of the Commonwealth of Virginia has allegedly been evidenced by the government at Richmond; and

Whereas, Particularly, many citizens of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont contend that an inequitable measure of taxation exists by which they bear a disproportionate share of the present tax burden of the Commonwealth; and

Whereas, The people of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont also believe that, currently, a scheme of representation exists by which the citizens of Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont do not have a proper share of representation in the government at Richmond; and, consequently

Whereas, The people of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont believe that their tax dollars are used to enrich the Tidewater and Northern Virginia through internal improvements which do not benefit the people of these other parts of Virginia, while the people of these other parts of Virginia have little to no say in how their tax dollars are allocated; and

Whereas, In recent days, these tensions have been compounded by a perception of contempt on the part of the government at Richmond for the differences in certain fundamental political and societal principles which prevail between the varied counties and cities of that Commonwealth; and

Whereas, In the latest, and most evident, in this string of grievances, the government at Richmond now seeks to place intolerable restraints upon the rights guaranteed under the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution to the citizens of that Commonwealth; and

Whereas, The Legislative body of West Virginia believes that this latest action defies the wise counsel which has come down to us in the august words of our common Virginia Founders: as the government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of that tribune of liberty, Patrick Henry-who stated to the Virginia Ratifying Convention in 1788 that “The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun”; and

Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of a Signer of the Declaration and premier advocate of American independence, Richard Henry Lee-who stated in The Federal Farmer that “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms”; and

Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of that zealous guardian of our inherent rights, George Mason-who stated that “To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them”; and

Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of the declaimer of our independence and theoretician of our freedoms, Thomas Jefferson-who stated in his first draft of the Virginia Constitution, that “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms”; and

Whereas, The Boards of Supervisors of many Virginia counties and the Councils of many Virginia cities have recognized this dangerous departure from the doctrine of the Founders on the part of the government at Richmond; and

Whereas, These Boards of Supervisors and Councils have passed resolutions refusing to countenance what they affirm are unwarranted and unconstitutional measures by that government to infringe the firearm rights of Virginians; and

Whereas, The actions of the government at Richmond undertaken since the recent general election have, regrettably, resulted in unproductive contention and escalating a lamentable state of civic tension; and

Whereas, That, as has been proven in numerous instances, such as have been observed internationally in more recent times with the peaceful dissolutions of Czechoslovakia and the Soviet Union, and the creation of South Sudan, or, earlier in Virginia’s own history, with the formation of Kentucky, the peaceful partition of neighboring peoples can occur, and, is often very beneficial to both sides in reducing tensions and improving the tenor of discourse over ongoing political and societal differences; and

Whereas, Article VI, Section 11 of The Constitution of the State of West Virginia explicitly permits additional territory to be admitted into, and become part of this state, with the consent of the Legislature and of a majority of the qualified voters of the state; and

Whereas, In a spirit of conciliation, the Legislature of West Virginia hereby extends an invitation to our fellow Virginians who wish to do so, to join us in our noble experiment of 156 years of separation from the government at Richmond; and, we extend an invitation to any constituent county or city of the Commonwealth of Virginia to be admitted to the body politic of the State of West Virginia, under the conditions set forth in our state Constitution, specifically, with the consent of a majority of the voters of such county or city voting upon such proposition; and we hereby covenant that their many grievances shall be addressed, and, we further covenant with them that their firearms rights shall be protected to the fullest extent possible under our Federal and State Constitutions; and

Whereas, Providing that the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia shall give its assent to any county or independent city presently part of the Commonwealth of Virginia having the opportunity and ability to do so, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Legislature of West Virginia.

Trump Holds Rally in Milwaukee, WI 1-14-20

© 2020   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service