Knesset Get's It Right, Courts Are Not To Legislate... Congress legislates, makes or amends the law.

Our Congress, the Administration, and Courts could learn something from what the Knesset is doing:

" The Knesset’s next parliamentary session, which starts on April 29, will debate and vote on the bill, designed to curb the High Court’s power. If adopted, the bill, based on the so-called ‘British model’, would allow only the Israeli parliament to cancel or change laws, limiting the Supreme Court’s power to override the Knesset in approving legislation that could potentially be unconstitutional."

A similar Act is precisely what Congress needs to pass... no court should be permitted to MAKE new law or to amend or void existing law.  There should be only one law in the land, the law as passed by an act of Congress. The Courts may rule a law unconstitutional, but that should NOT universally set the law aside, the verdict should apply only to the case and circumstances at hand. The Statutory Law should remain in effect as written.  This Act or Bill would not be necessary if the courts and the DOJ were functioning constitutionally.  The US Constitution grants Congress the exclusive power to make or amend the law... The legislative powers of Congress do not extend to unelected judges or courts. The judiciary and lawyers have usurped these legislative powers to the disdain of our Constitutional liberty.

Congress must act to repeal or amend any established law... if they chose to do nothing when the courts rule a law unconstitutional, then Congress is telling the Courts, their judgment does not extend to the law in general, the law remains as written. The erroneous idea that judicial action can universally change, amend, or set aside the Statutory law must end and end NOW. The Courts do not have the constitutional power or authority to legislate: make, amend, or set aside, the statutory law.  Their verdicts or judgments apply only to the case before the court. Their verdicts or judgments may not constitutionally usurp Congress's legislative powers, by effectively amending, or repealing, existing law.

The Courts VERDICTS OR JUDGMENTS extend only to the current case at law... the case before them. Other cases, alleging similar claims, challenging the statutory law or process, must be brought before the Courts separately. This must be done for each separate grievance until Congress agrees with the Courts, by amending or setting aside the Law or process in question.  Cases before the law should never amend or revoking the law, with the stroke of a single Justices pen.

Grievances against the Law are brought before the Courts or Congress for relief... this must be done as many times, as there are grievances with the law, UNTIL CONGRESS CHANGES OR REVOKES THE LAW.  Congress, not unelected judges or panels of judges, may revoke or amend the law.  The Courts don't have the Constitutional power to extend universal relief from the statutory law except in the immidiate case before them.

NO MORE RULE BY JUDICIAL FIAT... The courts and justices are not Congress or legislatures; they ADMINISTER THE LAW, they don't write the law or amend it.

Views: 156

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion


Yous stated: "Israel does this and its not cool if our Courts still have authority"  This law will not take the Court's Authority or Power to Adjudicate, as provided by the US Constitution... See Article 3 of the US Constitution pay attention to Section 2 for the Courts' powers to adjudicate... their jurisdictional powers.  The Judicial Power of the United States will remain vested in one Supreme Court and in such inferior courts as Congress may ordain and establish... if this act were adopted by the US.

Under this Act the Courts, Judicial Powers shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity arising under the Constitution... too, adjudicate and render judgments and orders as appropriate to the Administration of the Statutory and Constitutional law.  However, their Judicial Powers do not extend to modify, void or create, Statutory or Constitutional Law.  Congress is the only Branch of our Government with the Constitutional Authority and Power to create, amend, modify or correct, statutory law... They also are the only Branch with the authority to offer Amendments to the Constitution,  for consideration and ratification by the States.

The judiciary may not Constitutionally create, amend, or modify Statutory law... They may not lawfully demand that their judicial decisions and court orders become the law of the land.

 Supreme Court, look man, Mr. Massingale has complete files on these issues. Israel Politicians, just sold out the court system to the British, and if you reflect back to one of you blogs, the Federal Reserve is as Unconstitutional as it gets.

 Netanyahu has criminal charges pending against him, so he does what the DNC did, gave away the rights of sovereignty in order to cover up his charges, it is what politicians do.

 Mr. Nelson I have a issue with the Feds controlling the Lower Courts of each States, to prevent these Courts from being involved in their own rights to write States Laws.

 I do believe that, most if not all of the States have their own State Constitution,  this is beyond my scope of being involved with, now, Mr. Massingale, he does study these Constitutional Laws and the Unconstitutional Treaties involved.

 I kind of like just blogging, dumping crap against the system, and taking a poke at you, its like this, if I can not have any fun life would be a drag.


El Gran Poder de Dios siempre cumple Sus Promesas! (Our Lord God Almighty always keeps His Promises!)


 This is very interesting to watch one person who is Jewish, "Tom" stated this, and others who are Jewish states different, my my, this is politics.




Democrat Sen. Chris Murphy: ‘The Real Second Amendment Isn’t Absolute

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) tweeted Saturday there is a “real” Second Amendment and an “imaginary” one and he believes the real one is “not absolute.”

Murphy, “I support the real 2nd Amendment, not the imaginary 2nd Amendment. And the real 2nd Amendment isn’t absolute.”

The statement was a precursor to his call for banning “assault rifles” in the wake of the Santa Fe High School shooting, even though “assault rifles” were not used in the attack.

Murphy said the “real 2nd Amendment…allows Congress to wake up to reality and ban these assault rifles that are designed for one purpose only – to kill as many people as fast as possible.”

Gov. Greg Abbott (R-TX) said the Santa Fe High School attackers used a .38 revolver and a shotgun to carry out his heinous acts. Therefore, a ban on “assault rifles” would have done nothing to prevent the attack from occurring or the tragic loss of life from taking place.

It should be noted that Saturday was not the first time Sen. Murphy called the essence of the Second Amendment into question. On August 6, 2013, Breitbart News reported that Murphy told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow that “The Second Amendment is not an absolute right, not a God-given right. It has always had conditions upon it like the First Amendment has.”

Murphy did not grapple with the words, “Shall not be infringed.”


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service