A UK terror law watchdog has warned that new counter extremism measures planned by the government target innocent citizens and threaten to completely eradicate people’s personal freedoms.

According to David Anderson QC, the independent reviewer of the controversial terrorism legislation, the UKs new Counter Extremism Bill will see citizens with anti-establishment views unfairly targeted for harassment by authorities.

Counter extremism bill will target ordinary UK citizens

Posted on December 31, 2016 by Sean Adl-Tabatabai in News, UK : http://yournewswire.com/uk-counter-extremism-bill/

Independent.co.uk reports:

 

“They say that if you are going to engage in extremist activity, then you could be made subject to some coercive measure whereby you might not be able to use social media, or you might be limited in your associations, or in where you can go, and so on,” he said.

“I think silence coerced by law … is a very dangerous business, particularly when you are looking at something as vague as extremism.

“I’ve not met anyone who can really define it in a satisfactory way.

“There’s talk of British values, people who oppose diversity, democracy, the rule of law, tolerance. We can all think of people, I’m sure, we would love to see silenced in one way or the other, preachers of hate, of whatever kind.

“I think the trouble with rules like that is that all sorts of people are going, in principle, to be subject to them. People are going to complain about neighbours, they’re going to complain about people they work with, the police are going to feel they have to investigate all sorts of people who are miles away from being terrorists, but may just practise religion in a conservative way, or may have eccentric political views.

“That’s not really the way we have ever done things in this country. We didn’t ban communism during the Cold War, and I think we should be strong and robust enough to argue back.

“To start applying the force of the law to people who oppose certain values, I think, is a really difficult and dangerous line to go down,” he said.

Asked if such provisions in the Bill could themselves be opposed to fundamental British values, Mr Anderson, who is to stand down from his review of terror laws role in February, said: “That’s of course one way of putting it.”

Mr Anderson said he expected changes to the controversial Investigatory Powers Act, which some have branded a “snooper’s charter”, after the European Court of Justice ruled that measures in it allowing the “general and indiscriminate retention” of emails and other electronic communications were illegal.

He said provisions in the Act making telephone providers retain call logs for 12 months in case police want to look at them made sense.

“It certainly does look as though in some respects the Act is going to have to be amended. My own view is that the power is a particularly useful one to the police, and not only in terrorism cases, and it’s actually not very intrusive at all,” he said.

Mr Anderson said the UK had learned lessons after an “overreaction” following 9/11.

Asked if Britain had the balance right on anti-terror laws, he said: “I would say we are not in too bad a place. We made some terrible mistakes in the past. I think we really went over the top in Northern Ireland in the 1970s. In ways that I think are still having bad effects, and everyone can see that now.

“Even 10 years ago, we maybe overreacted in ways that we shouldn’t have done to the 9/11 bombings. But, I think what we have done is learn from that. The laws I’m reviewing now are actually less onerous, less restrictive than the ones I started to review in 2010/11.”

Views: 25

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

England has had prohibitions on Free Speech, when concerning Muslims, for a long time.  Heard a man on the Radio being interviewed about two years ago, about how a demeaning statement, put him in Jail for over a year.  They Breed, they Multiply, then get into Parliment, and then they take over.

Good morning Jo,

 My dad, believes they are trying to breed out all white, and create a race of one people again, back before the time of the Tower of Tower Of Babel. But first they must start a war between the two largest religions in the world.

John,

 Yes this is a bit to much, but its growing in the net.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Newsweek’s Headquarters
Raided By The NYPD

The headquarters of Newsweek was raided by the NYPD Thursday morning. Police reportedly took photos of the magazine’s servers.

New York Post reports:

About two dozen NYPD officers and investigators from the Manhattan district attorney’s office raided the offices of Newsweek and its parent company, IBT Media, on Thursday.

IBT Media was co-founded by Jonathan Davis and Etienne Uzac. The IRS placed a $1.2 million federal tax lien against Uzac in December 2017.

The agents were said to be photographing servers in the offices, but not downloading any files at the offices on 7 Hanover Square, according to sources.

Few details have emerged from the raid.

“Looking into reports that the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office @ManhattanDA raided Newsweek/IBT Offices today….sources say police have been there for hours. The DA has declined to comment,” tweeted reporter Avi Asher-Schapiro.

Newsweek is also in the news Thursday after an “insider” told The Wrap editor Jon Levine that the magazine has abandoned journalism for “rage clicks,” in the Trump-era.

“Newsweek was once a premiere media organization and an incredible springboard for young journalists hoping to grow a name for themselves,” the source told Levine.

“The company culture has turned the newsroom into a toxic work environment, while the publication has descended into a content farm for last-resort clickbait,” the source added.

YES PATRIOT STORE

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service