UH OH: Look which sites are being labeled “Fake News” sites…

Image result for fascismIf you’re curious as to just how rattled the left really is about Donald Trump winning the presidency, you need look no further than their attempt to silence new media outlets as a means of forcing folks to get information from the mainstream media.

Google has come out against what they call “fake news” websites, stating any site labeled as such will no longer be allowed to use their ad network — AdSense — as a means of making money off of advertisements.

Now, for those sites that are legitimately pumping out fake content, that’s one thing. However, if you look at the list of websites on professor has put together, you’ll notice an disturbing number of conservative media outlets

Oh, and if that’s not enough to get your dander up, Facebook is considering a similar policy.

The Atlantic is reporting, It just got harder for fake-news websites to make money from ads. Within hours of each other on Monday evening, Facebook and Google both announced that sites that intentionally deceive or mislead visitors won’t be allowed to use the internet giants’ advertising platforms.

Google’s AdSense and the Facebook Audience Network allow websites to easily place digital ads on their pages. Instead of going out and selling ads on their own, websites can lean on Google and Facebook to do that legwork for them. The networks act as middlemen, allowing online advertisers to “bid” for space on websites that have signed up. Google and Facebook share some of the revenue from the ads with the websites that run them.

Google said Monday that it will no longer allow websites access to its ad network if they “misrepresent, misstate, or conceal information about the publisher, the publisher’s content, or the primary purpose.” Pornography or hate-speech websites are already banned from using the AdSense platform.

The question that needs to be asked is what they consider to be “fake news?”

Well, a professor just so happened to put together a nice, neat little list. Here’s a sample of what you can find on it:

RedState, Breitbart, Twitchy, TheBlaze, and BizPac Review are on that list. Of course, Breitbart is connected to none other than President-elect Trump’s chief strategist, Steve Bannon.

read more:

http://www.allenbwest.com/michaelcantrell/uh-oh-look-sites-labeled-...

Views: 906

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I am offended! Why isn't TeaParty.org listed as a 'FAKE' news site? WTF!!!  (lol) 

Why, you say Steve? TeaParty.org is a a political organization/forum, and by definition does not declare itself to be an impartial authoritative source of factual current events.

             (although that information may be found here)

But lets be honest. The very grassroots Internet vehicle that catapulted the cafe-ole blackman into the White House, is now being used to beat that mans administration, the lobbyist pimps, the "one-worlder" internationalist string pullers,and their useful idiots, into the ground. So in the progressivist collective minds, the Net has ceased its usefulness and needs to be put down. It is revealing too much and is consolidating a resistance! IMO

If you are a First Amendment guy, I know you see why!

Wanna talk about FAKE (and as bonus, annoying) reporting................here ya go!

1) CNN*
2) The Huffington Post*
3) Time
4) NPR*
5) Slate
6) Newsweek*
7) U.S. News & World Report
8) Politico*
9) Salon*
10) Indy Media
11) The Democratic Underground*
12) The Atlantic
13) The Village Voice*
14) Daily Kos*
15) Eschaton
16) New Yorker
17) The Daily Beast*
18) Alternet
19) Common Dreams
20) Crooks and Liars
21) Buzzflash*
22) TPM Cafe
23) MoveOn
24) Mother Jones*
25) Amnesty International*
26) Counterpunch
27) The Nation
28) Antiwar*
29) Think Progress*
30) Raw Story
31) The New Republic
32) Planned Parenthood
33) Information Clearing House
34) What Really Happened
35) OpEdNews
36) Bad Subjects
37) Political Wire
38) World Socialist Website*
39) ACLU*
40) Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
41) Media Matters*
42) Feministing
43) Truthout
44) Drudge Retort*
45) The American Prospect
46) Harper’s Magazine
47) Firedoglake
48) TruthDig
49) Wonkette
50) AmericaBlog
51) FiveThirtyEight
52) The Washington Monthly
53) Michael Moore*
54) Bartcop
55) Air America
56) Oliver Willis
57) MyDD
58) Center for American Progress*
59) The Brookings Institute
60) Southern Poverty Law Center*
...and Yes, even the Weather Channel!
 
You left out Fox, NBC, ABC, CBS

Correct, ..........thanks.

I will add my school's newspaper and the local rag.

Lots of work went into gathering this list. It's scary how few good, truthful sites there are.

If something happens to one of our few conservative sites, like they disappear suddenly, that should be a call to arms.  We're probably safe for a while when Trump gets in.

Amen

Add Washington Post, the New York Times and NPR.

Excellent work!
You forgot Playboy, Penthouse, Esquire, Rolling Stone and Maxiam. And Hollywood rags and women's magazines.

You can add the Kansas City Star.....it's only value is as a bird cage liner

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Angry Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’: Pam Karlan Donated Thousands To Hillary And Was On Clinton’s List For Potential SCOTUS Nomination

Image result for Pam Karlan

The House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jerrold Nadler, kicked off its first impeachment circus Wednesday morning.

The four ‘witnesses’ testifying have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand — the four witnesses are law professors offering legal analysis.

One of the witnesses the Dems rolled out is an angry Hillary Clinton donor who was on Crooked’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

No wonder why this unhinged, dowdy woman is so pissed off!

“Professor Pam Karlan donated thousands of dollars to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. So she certainly has no vendetta against President Trump,” GOP Rep. Mark Walker said.

Congressman Walker also pointed out that Noah Feldman, the Dems first partisan witness in Wednesday’s hearing tweeted about impeaching Trump right after he was sworn in.

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

Meet Noah Feldman, House Democrats first partisan witness.

Look at the date of this tweet. He has been trying to get @realDonaldTrump impeached since 46 days into his presidency.

His reason? Trump criticized President Obama.

This is a sham impeachment with sham witnesses. https://twitter.com/NoahRFeldman/status/839185127494254592 

Noah Feldman @NoahRFeldman

Trump's wiretap tweets raise risk of impeachment http://bv.ms/2mY1ueX  via @BV

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker
 

The next witness, Karlan, has donated thousands to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

So she certainly has no vendetta against @realDonaldTrump.

These witnesses are as serious as House Democrats impeachment case: not at all.

The entire sham show trial is stacked with partisan hacks who have wanted to impeach Trump from the moment he won in November of 2016.

Norm Eisen, the Democrats’ counsel who is blasting Trump and questioning witnesses in Wednesday’s show trial, tweeted about impeaching Trump before Donald Trump was even sworn into office!

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service