Trump pitches 37 percent cut to State Department budget

Image result for state department budget slashingThe Trump administration is proposing a 37 percent spending cut for the State Department and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), according to multiple reports.

U.S. officials say the suggested decrease would likely require laying off employees, including security contractors at diplomatic facilities overseas, The Associated Press said Tuesday.

The AP said development assistance would likely take the biggest hit, citing officials familiar with the proposal.

The agencies together received $50.1 billion during the current fiscal year, it added, a little more than 1 percent of the total federal budget.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Tuesday said he would oppose drastic cuts to the State Department. 

read more:

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/321605-trump-pitches-37-...

Views: 390

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

We don't need security contractors at the State Department... Issue the staff personal carry weapons in high risk areas, and use the US Marine Corps to provide primary security.  Cut all USAID aid to countries that have historically been hostile to America...  Cut back the staff by 20% and let the other 80% know that they are next if they don't pick up the slack.

Looks like Trump is looking at government like it's in Chapter 11, and trimming the fat and unnecessary personnel.  FINALLY.....

Our great leader Trump strikes again. The State Department should retrench from a ton of useless places where the swamp established US delegations. We have enough things to take care of at home. We don't need a bloated State Department. - Let's just hope Congress won't stand in opposition to our great leader again. Otherwise Trump will have to get rid of this opposition somehow and also of the opposition in the courts. We need Trump to rule supreme over the US and her people so that he can make America great again. Opposition to Trump is not needed!

TROLLS not welcome. 

Paul, we don't have a closed society and a great or 'supreme leader' ... America has a 'President' whose powers are limited by our Constitution... Congress and the Courts, may be corrupt but the President must deal with them using Constitutional means (lawful means)... He can't just  shut them down. 

We don't want our President to RULE SUPREME... that, goes totally against our heritage and founding father's intent for governing in America.  Why continue to ignore the heart of the issue by sarcastically portraying the Tea Party Patriot as wanting a totalitarian form of government?

The true Patriot desires limited, legitimate, lawful, Constitutional government and leaders who will not place their needs, and those of their ruling cabal, ahead of the people's needs. We are not against lawful, constitutional, opposition... In fact, such opposition is healthy in our form of government.

America doesn't need or have a supreme leader...

North Korea · Supreme leader
North Korea · Supreme leader
Kim Jong - Un

What are you talking about? I am in favor of "lawful, constitutional, opposition" as well. We talked about this before. But I certainly don't like any opposition and dissent to Trump. If you read comments on this site, you will note that none of us do. Almost everyone here goes against rinos in the legislative and misguided judges when they go against Trump. And so we should. Our leader Trump needs to reign supreme, he needs to control the legislative and the judiciary, not even mentioning the media. That's why we also need to fight the legislative and judiciary. If you really read this site you'll see that I am with the huge majority. As a matter of fact, show me criticism of Trump on this site and I might change my mind. You might be the only one who suggests such a thing and in turn I suggest you start watching CNN.

Paul...

I believe that some of your terminology and expressions are over the top... supreme leader, Trump needs to reign supreme, control the legislative and the judiciary...

No, we need a Constitutional President who uses the Constitution too reign in excesses in government... we don't need a supreme leader... N. Korea has a supreme leader.  We don't need a dictator who runs over the Constitution and exceeds his Constitutional authority. We need a lawful and thoughtful President capable of enforcing Constitutional law and reigning in an out of control bureaucracy and federalism.

It may sound like it is over the top to you but it is accurate. Also we don't need to compare ourselves to N. Korea (which incidentally calls itself a Republic like we do but unlike the US they include "Democratic" in their official name as well). The Constitution gives powers to the Executive, the Legislative, and the Judiciary but we the people are against any overreach of the Legislative and the Judiciary if they are in opposition to Trump, are we not? Or are you trying to say that it's legitimate and lawful that Ryan, McConnell, judges, etc are exercising their power to oppose our president? Trump needs to demolish them all, doesn't he? How else can he put his agenda in place to make America great AGAIN as it was when the president didn't have to deal with a renegade judiciary or legislative? There is too much opposition and dissent to our great leader whom we support through thick and thin. So, let's not squabble amongst ourselves and give Trump unconditional support especially in the face of the opposition and dissent he encounters as we are doing here on this site where we also support each other in this effort.

" The EPA’s reductions are less severe, with as much as 24 percent of its budget possible getting pruned according to reports Monday.

Trump officials will purportedly float a $6.1 billion budget for the EPA next year, a $2 billion cut from current levels.

Reports said the plan could result in layoffs for 20 percent of EPA staff, reducing its total employment to 15,000 to 12,000 workers.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Tuesday said Trump’s reported plans for his first budget were “dead on arrival.” RINO!!!!!

“It’s not going to happen,” he said, according to NBC News. “It would be a disaster. A budget this lean would put those who serve overseas for the State Department at risk. And it’s not going to happen.”

Trump’s first budget proposal is slated for a March 16 lease, but a lack of details about its contents is already fueling bipartisan concerns. "

" Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Tuesday said he would oppose drastic cuts to the State Department. " RINO!!!!

You know... Trump needs to get real tough ... he should tell McConnell and the RINO's that their budget is DOA he won't sign it... Trump should shut down the government except for essential services... Constitutional functions and go about his business without worrying about funding any of the other programs... let them die on the vine... to hell with the RINO's let's get the WAR ON NOW... while we at least have the White House... we certainly don't have Congress.

Time to get TOUGH Mr. President... send Mitch and Paul a PINK SLIP with your budget... tell them that you included a specific line item to defund their seats in Congress... and let the punks think on that.  Of course, none of this will happen, albeit I would be nice to see this gesture made... Punch those two bums squarely in the nose... Defund their positions. They can serve without pay....  that's all there worth.

We don't need or want most of the state dept. We don't have to be in all these countries we are not Globalist. Keep them only where we need them.  How is all that money spent???

There are 15,000 employees doing what?

It's not just the State Dep. that is bloated ! The entire government is bloated ! It's full of inept jackasses that hire their inept friends, that simply coudn't make a living in the private sector ! Our government today, has been designed to protect itself !  How many government officials that we know of, are guilty of  crimes, and have never been charged ? Let alone convicted ! President Trump and his staff along with us have a huge challenge ahead, trying to fix "GOVERNMENT GONE WILD" !

News Alert
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   Email
 
Trump issues revised travel ban
President Trump on Monday issued a new executive order on immigration that includes key changes meant to help it withstand the legal challenges that torpedoed its previous travel ban.
Read the full story here

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by Gary VarvelPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

SICK: Leprosy On The Rise In Los Angeles 

Ahh, the joys of open borders and Democrat leadership.

California is not just a public toilet but now there is evidence that leprosy is on the rise in Los Angeles County.

Barack Obama changed US law in 2016 and allowed immigrants with blistering STDs and leprosy to migrate to the US.

Medscape reported:

Leprosy, also known as Hansen’s disease, is rarely seen in the United States, but cases continue to emerge in Los Angeles County, a new report says.

“Hansen’s disease still exists, and we need to educate medical students and physicians,” coauthor Dr. Maria Teresa Ochoa from Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, told Reuters Health by email.

Dr. Ochoa and colleagues identified 187 patients with the disease in a review of medical records from their leprosy clinic spanning 1973 to 2018. Most patients were Latino, originating from Mexico, and they experienced a median delay in diagnosis of more than three years, the team reports JAMA Dermatology, online August 7.

Multibacillary leprosy (MB) cases outnumbered paucibacillary leprosy (PB) cases by nearly eight to one (88.6% vs. 11.4%, respectively), and Latino patients were more likely than non-Latino patients to have MB, as were patients from Central or South America (versus other regions).

Most patients (80.7%) received multidrug therapy, and most (92.6%) received antibiotics for more than two years, especially if they had MB.

Only about half of patients (56.7%) had World Health Organization (WHO) grade 0 disability (no signs or symptoms suggestive of leprosy or disability) at the one-year follow-up, whereas 16.0% had grade 1 disability (loss of protective sensation) and 26.2% had grade 2 disability (visible deformity) at the last follow-up.

Among the patients who lost protective sensation, 87.7% (50/57) did not regain it following therapy.

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service