Trump on Possible Muslim President: ‘Some People Have Said It Already Happened’

When asked about the possibility of having a Muslim in the White House, Donald Trump said on NBC’s Meet the Press that some people think it’s already happened.

Host Chuck Todd asked Trump aboutThursday’s town hall exchange, during which a supporter accused Barack Obama of being a Muslim. “Can you imagine supporting or being comfortable if a Muslim ever became President of the United States?” he asked

“I can say that, you know, it’s something that at some point could happen. We’ll see, it could happen.” Trump said. “Would I be comfortable? I don’t know if we have to address it right now.”

“Some people have said it already happened, frankly. Of course, you wouldn’t agree with that,” he added.

read more:

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/trump-on-possible-muslim-president-some-...

Views: 1960

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

What "possible??" Too many people are afraid to say the truth. Yes, The Donald, we all must "address" it right now, and get rid of that scum!

Of  course he is a Muslim, and we have many pieces of evidence on our web site that proves it:

http://helpingmisguidedvoters.com/removeobama.html

http://helpingmisguidedvoters.com/removeobama.html#remove2

http://helpingmisguidedvoters.com/muslim_president_harm.html

http://helpingmisguidedvoters.com/veterans.html


And my web site partner sent me this this morning:

http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/legisnet90/summary/900SR0110.html

But he's much much more, he's also radical anti-American Communist.

I have been telling people for over 5 years that THIS PRESIDENT IS AN ENEMY OF THE UNITED STATES and THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.  Americans just cannot believe that we have been so stupid as to elect an enemy of our own country to the White House........NOT ONCE, BUT TWICE !

Now that it is becoming clear that Barack Obama is taking, not only this country, but the whole world apart piece by piece, I hope more Americans start grasping the danger we have inside our own government.

He is a total Muslim. That's just my opinion.

"He is a total Muslim. That's just my opinion."

No, it's not just your opinion.

It is a FACT that he was born and raised as a Muslim, as confirmed by his own book.

It is a FACT that according to both religions, he cannot convert to Christianity.

It is a FACT that nobody has produced a single record that he ever tried to convert, which means he is STILL a Muslim.

It is a FACT that if the four CHRISTIANS (including our Ambassador) who were killed in Benghazi, had been Muslims, the perpetrators would have gotten the same treatment that 84 CHRISTIANS in Waco, mostly women and children, got.

It is a FACT that only Russia supports CHRISTIANS in Syria, while WE support the very Muslims for which our very own "war against terror" was intended to wage war against.

We what else can we expect when our own Commander-in-Chief is one of the enemy?We seem to have a "national sucide wish".  What the people want they shall have, so they had better wake up.

He ducked the question like a seasoned politician. Why?

For being so out spoken on other issues, why can't he speak plainly on this one? 

His supporters REALLY need to take a good hard look at this.

It didn't NEED answering.....................we already KNOW.  Sometimes NOT opening your mouth says SOOOOO much more.

Agree! Trumps presence is ungluing the whole corrupt cover-up. Would anyone "dare" state the President is a Muslim to any other candidate? GO TRUMP!!

Linda

He didn't duck the question.

Sometimes one has the wisdom to know when less is more.

This is one of those times.

Surprised you didn't get that . But I shouldn't be surprised because as you have stated you don't support Trump. Enough said.

PRECISELY.  A lot can be said at time by NOT speaking verbally

Linda, here is one question an astute observer of Trump noted...what about his 2 foreign wives? They were not citizens were they? And that would make his kids anchor babies also wouldn't it? 

I am enjoying the pot that Trump is stirring for the time being...but will it last, or will he fade into the dreaded 3rd-party status and succeed in only distracting the voters?

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service