TRUMP IS RIGHT TO SKIP THE CORRESPONDENTS' DINNER

The White House Correspondents' Association dinner is the embodiment of the establishment. It has evolved into a celebrity studded event that mixes entertainment and politics in a toxic combination. It represents the elitist bubble at its worst. It's an event that celebrates the importance of the media and the unimportance of the people.

It's against everything that President Trump stands for. And he's entirely right to skip it.

Attending would have been a disaster. Dumping it once again sidelines the core of the media establishment. It transforms the story from which media associations or organizations are pulling out, to Trump's rejection of it. It's also another opportunity for the media to fulminate about private grudges that the country doesn't care about.

read more:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/265923/trump-right-skip-correspon...

Views: 408

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

You can't blame the President for not going.

Who in their right mind would want to subject themselves to being surrounded with lying scumbags for even one minute, let alone an hour or so.

Mr. President, on behalf of all of us deplorables, stay far away from the libtard press trash.

Unlike the previous resident on Pennsylvania Avenue, President Trump will be working.

when will the media learn to just report the news and not make it all about them 

Why would he attend this.  The media is the enemy.

Trump is so different from Obama I can hardly believe it!  Obama never made a right decision, Trump almost never makes a bad decision.  When he does he corrects it.  Obama doubled down on his bad decisions and made them 10 times worse.  Obama said Trump had no experience and would make a lousy president.  The fact that Obama said that about Trump tells me that Trump will make a great president.  You could bet on the fact that what ever Obama says it will be wrong.  You can bet on the fact that what ever Trump says will be right.   

Douglas, you are exactly right !!!!   One thing I have noticed about Obama and the liberals, is that when they say something , the opposite is always true.   And that is the facts !!!!!!!!

Here what I am saying and you will notice also !

Next year it may be known as the Former White House Correspondents' Association dinner

I am proud of TRUMP!

SCREW THE WHCA DINNER!  IT'S ATTENDANCE HAS NOTHING MORE THAN THE "DESPECABLE, LYING, SENSELESS SCUM" THAT MAKE UP THE MEDIA!  THE DEPLORABLES SHOW TOTAL DISDANE FOR THE GROUP.  HOPE ALL IN ATTENDANCE GET DISINTARY FROM THE MEAL! 

Wise move. . . . . .President Trump knows exactly what is going on and knows how to handle it !!!!!!!

What a tear jerky for sure when the First Lady read The Lord's Prayer at Melbourne, Florida rally.

Everyone needs to watch !!!!!!!                 I'm sure the Lord was pleased !!!!!!!!!!!!

Trump's no fool - and he's not bent on self-destruction, either!!  Wonder what they'll say and do WITHOUT anyone (please, God!) from the Trump Administration to diss and bat about? In the past - even with W - there had been, at least, a modicum of respect and even humor.  But with Trump, it's become totally crazy!  Keep on keeping on, Mr. President - the only ones who love you are THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service